Márquez-González RM, Gutiérrez-Padilla JA, Pérez-Rulfo ID, Rodríguez-Ochoa J, Márquez-Amezcua JM, Del Villar-Vilchis JD, Avila-Ledezma JE, Curiel-Medel E, Aguila-Cano R, Montaño-Angeles LO, Guerrero-De la Torre J, Sanchéz-González SK, Rosales-Rodriguez CP

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 226-232
PDF size: 546.79 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Congenital malformations are considered a problem of public health, being one of 10 main causes of infant mortality with an incidence on a global scale of 25-62/1000 born. In Mexico they include 3 % of the hospitable departures of the newborn babies. The goal was to to determine the frequency of congenital malformations in infants admitted in the External Service of Neonatal Intensive Care of the Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde during the period between 2012 and 2015
Material and Methods. During 3 years 4136 newborns were studied, grouped by devices and systems with the diagnostic of congenital malformations. The results were compared as described in other populations.
Results. Of 4136 patients, 561 presented congenital malformations. The rate of congenital malformations was 13.5 per 100 live births. Be noted an increase significant in the prevalence of the year 2014, followed of a decrease notable for the year 2015 with 4.3% and 2.3% respectively.
Discussion. The rate of mortality during the period studied was of the 33%. The detection early of them factors of risk that involve a role important for the development of them malformations congenital should be considered of vital importance to design programs directed to the control of the same.

REFERENCES

1. 1.Organización Mundial de la Salud. 63a Asamblea Mundial de la Salud. Defectos congénitos. Ginebra: OMS; 2010. p. 1-7.

2. 2.Matovelle C, et al., Estudio Descriptivo: Frecuencia de Malformaciones Congénitas en Pacientes Pediátricos del Hospital “José Carrasco Arteaga”. Rev Med HJCA 2015; 7(3): 249-253.

3. 3.Czeizel AE, Intôdy Z, Modell B. What proportion of congenital abnormalities can be prevented? BMJ 1993;306 (6876):499-503.

4. 4.Yoon P, et al., The national birth defects prevention study. Public health reports. 2001;116(Suppl 1):32.

5. 5.Porras-Hurtado, et al., Prevalencia de defectos congénitos en Risaralda, 2010-2013, Biomédica 2016;36:556-63.

6. 6.Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades 10 CIE 10 [homepage on the Internet] [updated 2017 Enero 3 ] . Disponible en:http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/brow se/2010/en#/XVII.

7. 7.Salinas-Torres et al., Malformaciones congénitas como causa de hospitalización en una Unidad de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal, Perinatol Reprod Hum 2012; 26 (2): 83-89.

8. 8.Vázquez Martínez et al., Congenital Anomalies among Live Births, Medisur, Febrero 2014, Volumen 12, Numero 1, pp. 42-50.

9. 9.Bozán Frómeta et al, Behavior of congenital defects in patients from Cabaiguán muinicipality. Years 2006- 2011, Gaceta Médica Espir, Vol.14, No.3 (2012) ISSN 1608 – 8921.

10. 10.Navarrete Hernández et al, Prevalencia de malformaciones congénitas registradas en el certificado de nacimiento y de muerte fetal. México, 2009-2010, Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2013;70(6):499-505.

11. 11.Oliva R JA. Malformaciones cardiacas fetales. En: Ultrasonografía diagnóstica fetal, obstétrica y ginecológica. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010.p.97-124

12. 12.Lialiaris T, Mantadakis E, et al,. Frequency of genetic diseases and health coverage of children requiring admission in a general pediatric clinic of northern Greece. Ital J Pediatr 2010; 36: 9.