medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Jalisco

ISSN 2448-8747 (Print)
Publicación cuatrimestral editada por la Secretaría de Salud Jalisco
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number Esp

<< Back Next >>

Sal Jal 2018; 5 (Esp)

Análisis del sistema de vigilancia de microcefalia – República Dominicana, 2016-2017

Colome-Hidalgo M, Skewes-Ramm R, Herrera-Morban D, Gil-Fernández M, Donado-Campos J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 67-73
PDF size: 421.54 Kb.


Key words:

Congenital malformations, microcephaly, analysis.

ABSTRACT

Background: Microcephaly represents the main congenital malformation in the Dominican Republic. Since 2016, 483 malformations have been reported, of which 64% correspond to microcephaly. National surveillance of microcephaly was introduced in the context of the Zika epidemic during 2016. An analysis is carried out with the objective of describing its magnitude according to the clinical-epidemiological characteristics during 2016-2017. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study of the demographic, clinical and laboratory data available in the national surveillance database was conducted. Case definition: Live newborn with cephalic perimeter less than two standard deviations at 24 hours postpartum, according to standardized references according to gestational age and sex. Proportions, measures of central tendency and dispersion were calculated from the cases notifi ed by the health centers. Results: 310 microcephaly were reported with an average of 3.4 ± 2.7 per week, showing a progressive increase from week 30 of 2016 and a decrease in week 2 of 2017, evidencing a behavior propagated probably at the expense of pregnancies ‹24 weeks of gestation suspects of Zika. The Metropolitan Region has a rate of 31 / 10,000 live births. The female / male microcephaly ratio was 1: 0.7. 13% (41) presented clinical complications, characterized by respiratory distress 88% (36/41), liver failure 7% (3) and other 5% (2). 63% (95/150) of the samples were positive for Zika. Conclusions: The data analyzed indicate a tendency to decrease cases of microcephaly that coincides with the post-epidemic period of the Zika virus. The female sex was the most affected and the clinical complications were few. The teratogenic capacity of Zika implies the coexistence of other malformations, therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the attributes of the surveillance to recommend specific actions and improve the system.


REFERENCES

  1. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Resolución No. 000013 que dispone de carácter obligatorio la notifi cación de los casos de Guillain Barré, microcefalias y otras anomalías congénitas relacionadas con la epidemia de enfermedad por virus Zika, por parte de toda la red de servicios públicos y privados. República Dominicana, 14 de abril de 2016.

  2. Federico Costa, Albert I Ko. Zika virus and microcephaly: where do we go from here? Th e Lancet Infectious Diseases. Available online 11 December 2017, Page 1-2.

  3. Elizabeth B Brickley, Laura C Rodrigues. Further pieces of evidence in the Zika virus and microcephaly puzzle. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, Volume 2, Issue 3, March 2018, Pages 162-164

  4. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Resolución No. 00004 que declara la actualización de enfermedades y eventos de notifi cación obligatoria del sistema nacional de salud, y modifi ca la resolución No. 00005- 6 de fecha 5 de mayo del año 2006 sobre el reporte obligatorio y oportuno de parte de todo el sistema nacional de salud de diagnósticos probables de enfermedades o eventos priorizados. República Dominicana, 17 de enero de 2013.

  5. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Sistema de Alerta Temprana (SAT) SE 01 a la SE 52 de 2016. República Dominicana. 2017

  6. Kleber de Oliveira W, Cortez-Escalante J, De Oliveira WT, et al. Increase in Reported Prevalence of Microcephaly in Infants Born to Women Living in Areas with Confi rmed Zika Virus Transmission During the First Trimester of Pregnancy. Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(9):242-7

  7. Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, Horovitz DD, Cavalcanti DP, Pessoa A, et al. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly — Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65:59-62

  8. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico, Semana No. 11, febrero 2017.

  9. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico, Semana No. 22, mayo 2017.

  10. German R et al. Updated Guidelines for Evaluating Public Health Surveillance Systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001, Jul 27; 50(RR-13); 1-35.

  11. Ofi cina Nacional de Estadística. Informe General. IX Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. República Dominicana, 2010.

  12. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popovic M, Poljšak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(10):951- 8.

  13. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico Semana No. 52, diciembre 2016

  14. Butler D. First Zika-linked birth defects detected in Colombia. Nature. 2016 Mar 10; 531(7593):153.

  15. Cauchemez S, Besnard M, Bompard P, Dub T, Guillemette-Artur P, EyrolleGuignot D, Salje H, Van Kerkhove MD, Abadie V, Garel C, Fontanet A, Mallet HP. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013-15: a retrospective study. Lancet. 2016 Mar 15. pii: S0140-6736(16)00651-6.

  16. Oliveira Melo A, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld P, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis A. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 47(1):6-7

  17. Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiológico Semana No. 8, febrero 2017.

  18. Driggers RW, Ho CY, Korhonen EM, Kuivanen S, Jääskeläinen AJ, Smura T, Rosenberg A, Hill DA et al. Zika Virus Infection with Prolonged Maternal Viremia and Fetal Brain Abnormalities. N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 30.

  19. Maharajan MK, Ranjan A, Chu JF, Foo WL, Chai ZX, Lau EY, et al. Zika Virus Infection: Current Concerns and Perspectives. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology. December 2016, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 383–394. DOI: 10.1007/s12016-016-8554-7

  20. Lazear HM, Diamond MS. Zika Virus: New Clinical Syndromes and Its Emergence in the Western Hemisphere. Pierson TC, editor. Journal of Virology. 2016 May 15;90(10):4864–75.

  21. Sampathkumar P, Sanchez JL. Zika Virus in the Americas: A Review for Clinicians. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2016 Apr; 91(4):514–21.

  22. Fellner C. Zika virus: anatomy of a global health crisis. Pharmacy and Th erapeutics. 2016; 41(4):242.

  23. Karwowski MP, Nelson JM, Staples JE, Fischer M, Fleming-Dutra KE, Villanueva J, et al. Zika Virus Disease: A CDC Update for Pediatric Health Care Providers. PEDIATRICS. 2016 May 1; 137 (5):e20160621–e20160621.

  24. Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Rice ME, Galang RR, et al. Pregnancy Outcomes Aft er Maternal Zika Virus Infection During Pregnancy - U.S. Territories, January 1, 2016-April 25, 2017. Informe Semanal de Morbilidad y Mortalidad (MMWR) 2017; 66:615-621. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16/mmwr.mm6623e1.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Sal Jal. 2018;5