medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

Rev Esp Med Quir 2018; 23 (2)

Spermatobioscopy. World Health Organization 2010

Flores-Sánchez I
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 99-103
PDF size: 106.02 Kb.


Key words:

Human semen, Sperm, Laboratory Manual 2010 WHO.

ABSTRACT

The study of male factor infertility has been one of the least clear and hardest to protocol. Besides, seminal parameters have been subject to discussion and their impact on fertility still is controversial. Classifying the millions of spermatozoids that are daily produced by a male had been a hard and continuous work until 1980, when the World Health Organization first published the “Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen”. This manual establishes and standardizes the proceedings and results for clinical laboratories studies and also serves for diagnostic purposes. It has been updated and widely revised by a group of experts in 1987, 1992, 1999 and 2010. The last edition (5th) has several changes in the proceedings and the evaluation of their outcomes, and it has been based on data obtained from males whose partners had successfully achieved a pregnancy prior to the study.


REFERENCES

  1. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definition of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):63.

  2. Brugh VM 3rd, Lipshultz LI. Male factor infertility: evaluation and management. Med Clin North Am. 2004;88:367-85.

  3. Thonneau P, Marchand S, Tallec A, Ferial ML, Ducot B, Lansac J, et al. Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French regions (1988-1989). Hum Reprod. 1991;6:811-6.

  4. The optimal evaluation of the infertile male: AUA best practice statement [Internet]. Linthicum, Maryland: American Urological Association, 2010. Disponible en: https://www.auanet.org/common/pdf/ education clinical- guidance/Male-Infertility-d.pdf

  5. van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ, F Habbema JD, Hompes PG, Kremer JA, et al. Role of semen analysis in subfertile couples. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:1013-9.

  6. McLachlan RI. The endocrine control of spermatogenesis. Bailleres Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;14:345-62.

  7. Johnson L, Petty CS, Neaves WB. Further quantification of human spermatogenesis: germ cell loss during postprophase of meiosis and its relationship to daily sperm production. Biol Reprod. 1983;29:207-15.

  8. MacLeod J, Gold RZ. The male factor in fertility and infertility. VI. Semen quality and certain other factors in relation to ease of conception. Fertil Steril. 1953;4(1):10-33.

  9. Eliasson R. Standards for investigation of human semen. Andrology. 1971;349-64.

  10. Mortimer D, Menkveld R. Sperm morphology assessment—historical perspectives and current opinions. J Androl. 2001;22:192-205.

  11. Menkveld R. An investigation of environmental influences on spermatogenesis and semen parameters. PhD Dissertation (in Afrikaans). University of Stellenbosch, Faculty of Medicine, South Africa, 1987.

  12. Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJ, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Human Reprod. 1990;5:586-92.

  13. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Lombard CJ, Van der Merwe JP, van Zyl JA, et al. Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:1118-23.

  14. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:112-7.

  15. Toner JP, Mossad H, Grow DR, Morshedi M, Swanson RJ, Oehninger S. Value of sperm morphology assessed by strict criteria for prediction of the outcome of artificial (intrauterine) insemination. Andrologia. 1995;27(3):143-8.

  16. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen – Cervical mucus interaction, 1980.

  17. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen – Cervical mucus interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

  18. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen – Cervical mucus interactions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

  19. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge: University Press, 1999.

  20. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. 5th Ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010.

  21. Sigman M, Jarow JP. Male infertility. En: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan Jr ED, Wein AJ, editores. Campbell’s Urology, 8th ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 2002. p. 1475

  22. Espinoza NO, Sarabia L. Evaluación y estandarización de la calidad del espermiograma: nuevos límites inferiores de referencia. Int J Morphol. 2011;29(3):885-90.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2018;23