medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        

    • ENVÍO DE ARTÍCULOS

  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2006; 28 (2)

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults

Ramírez CFJ, Jiménez LG, Arenas OJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 97-102
PDF size: 119.75 Kb.


Key words:

Biliary complications, cholecystectomy, laparoscopic surgery.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine de frequency of complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital.
Setting: General Hospital National Medical Center “La Raza”.
Design: Open, observational, retrospective, transversal, descriptive.
Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics to characterize the studied population and comparison of approaching techniques by means of Fisher’s and Yate’s exact tests.
Patients and method: From January 1999 to June 2001, 546 patients were subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We assessed complications. Inclusion criteria were trans-and post-operative complications due to the type of approach and surgical technique.
Results: Patients were 469 women and 77 men, average age of 45.1 for women and 50.7 for men. There were 169 patients with complications, of these 189 minor and 14 major complications. Of the major complications two corresponded to large vessels and two the main billiary tract, others corresponded to the liver and cystic artery. Only bleeding injuries required conversion. All recovered without sequelae. Of the minor complications, 127 were vesicular ruptures, 34 infections, 3 residual stones, 2 subcutaneous emphysema with the Veress technique, 2 wall hematomas, 1 bilioma, 1 cystic fistula, 1 postincisional hernia, and 1 singultus. Veress technique approaches were 503, only here were approaching incidents encountered, Hasson technique was used in 43 cases without incidents. No statistically significant differences were found between the two techniques (p = 0.76). Conversion had to be performed in 39 patients.
Conclusion: The frequency of complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a teaching hospital lies within the safety parameters accepted worldwide.


REFERENCES

  1. Sawaya DE Jr, Johnson LW, Sittig K, McDonald JC, Zibari GB. Iatrogenic and noniatrogenic extrahepatic biliary tract injuries: a multi-institutional review. Am Surg 2001; 67: 473-477.

  2. Beckingham IJ. ABC of diseases of liver, pancreas, and biliary system. Gallstone disease. BMJ 2001; 322(7278): 91-94.

  3. Borjeson J, Liu SK, Jones S, Matolo NM. Selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: how selective? Am Surg 2001; 66: 616-618.

  4. Chandler CD, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SE. Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 2000; 66: 896-900.

  5. De Wit LT, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ. Surgical management of iatrogenic bile duct injury. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1999; 34: 89-94.

  6. Deziel DJ, Millikan, KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko ST, Airan MC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 1993; 165: 9-14.

  7. Dobay KJ, Freier DT, Albear P. The absent role of prophylactic antibiotics in low-risk patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1999; 65: 226-228.

  8. Fuji, Y, Tanaka H, Kawasaki T. Prophylaxis with oral granisetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 101-104.

  9. Higgins A, London J, Charland S, Ratzer E, Clark J, Haun W, Maher DP. Prophylactic antibiotics for elective cholecystectomy: are they necessary? Arch Surg 1999; 134: 611-613.

  10. Jost CJ, Smith JL, Smith RS. Spontaneous hepatic hemorrhage secondary to retained intraperitoneal gallstones. Am Surg 2000; 66: 1059-1060.

  11. Larkin M. Transatlantic, robot-assisted telesurgery deemed a success. Lancet 2001; 358: 1074.

  12. Stewart L, Way LW. Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. factors that influence the results of treatment. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 1123-8.

  13. Mcguckin M, Shea JA, Schwartz JS. Infection and antimicrobial use in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20: 624-626.

  14. Muench J, Albrink M. Delay in treatment of biliary disease during pregnancy increases morbidity and can be avoided with safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 2001; 67: 539-543.

  15. Hyser MJ, Chaudhry V, Byrne MP. Laparoscopic transcystic management of choledocholithiasis. Am Surg 1999; 65: 606-610.

  16. Ponsky JL, Heniford BT, Gersin K. Choledocholithiasis: evolving intraoperative strategies. Am Surg 2000; 66: 262-268.

  17. Sarli L, Contini S, Sansebastiano G, Gobbi S, Costi R, Roncoroni L. Does laparoscopic cholecystectomy worsen the prognosis of unsuspected gallbladder cancer? Arch Surg 2000; 135: 1340-44.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2006;28