medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial

ISSN 2007-3178 (Print)
Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, Colegio Mexicano de Cirugía Bucal y Maxilofacial, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 3

<< Back

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac 2018; 14 (3)

Reconstrucción condilar bilateral mediante osteotomía vertical segmentaria de rama mandibular bilateral con transporte óseo vascularizado. Alternativa quirúrgica

Castillo CG, Mercado MMÁ, Ayala BJM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 157-152
PDF size: 369.34 Kb.


Key words:

Sequelae of trauma, condilar reconstruction, vertical osteotomy, vascularized bone transport.

ABSTRACT

The jaw is one of the parts of the face most commonly affected by trauma, second only to the nasal bones. Subcondylar fractures are one of the most difficult types of trauma injuries to manage due to the anatomical relationships that exist in what is an area that is very hard to access for the purpose of restoring a movable bone such as the jaw. The choice of what kind of surgery to perform on a patient will be determined by the type and complexity of the dentofacial deformity caused by the trauma, the patient’s expectations, and their socioeconomic background. Knowing the anatomy of the mandible and joint and neuromuscular function allows us to perform innovative surgical alternatives.


REFERENCES

  1. Booth PW, Eppley BL, Shmelzeisen R. Traumatismo maxilofaciales y reconstrucción facial estética. Ed. Elsevier; 2005. pp. 281-295.

  2. Ellis E 3rd, Moos KF, el-Attar A. Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1985; 59 (2): 120-129.

  3. Fonseca RJ. Oral and maxillofacial trauma. 4th edition. Ed. Elsevier 2a edición Traumatic Injuries to the Mandibular Condyle 331-353.

  4. Isberg A. Disfunción de la articulación temporomandibular. Sao Paulo, Brasil: Artes Medicas Latinoamericanas; 2001. p. 51.

  5. Sawazaki R, Lima-Júnior SM, Asprino L, Moreira RW, de Moraes M. Incidence and patterns of mandibular condyle fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 68 (6): 1252-1259.

  6. Marker P, Nielsen A, Bastian HL. Fractures of the mandibular condyle. Part 1: patterns of distribution of types and causes of fractures in 348 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000; 38 (5): 417-421.

  7. Nussbaum ML, Laskin DM, Best AM. Closed versus open reduction of mandibular condylar fractures in adults: a meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008; 66 (6): 1087-1092.

  8. Soto-Góngora S. Técnica de tunelización más fijación-dinámica. Aplicada en el manejo de la fractura subcondilar. Odont Act. 2012; 9 (113): 6-10.

  9. Hall MB. Condylar fractures: surgical management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 52 (11): 1189-1192.

  10. Ellis E 3rd. Condylar process fractures of the mandible. Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 16 (2): 193-205.

  11. Rojas SRA, Julián G, Lankin BJ. Fracturas mandibulares: experiencia en un hospital de trauma. Rev Méd Chile. 2002; 130 (5): 537-543.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Bucal Maxilofac. 2018;14