Aguilar-Navarro HJ

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 340
PDF size: 195.09 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The definition and measurement of complex variables, such as medical professionalism, demand the revision of concepts and adherence to a methodology that allows the foundation of results, based on which some observations and suggestions are pointed out in this letter.

REFERENCES

1. Hodges BD, Ginsburg S, Cruess R, Cruess S, Delport R, Hafferty F, et al. Assessment of professionalism: Recommendations from the Ottawa (2010) Conference. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):354-63.

2. Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Defining professionalism in medical education: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2014;36(1):47-61. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.850154.

3. van Mook WN, van Luijk SJ, O'Sullivan H, Wass V, Zwaveling JH, Schuwirth LWT, et al. The concepts of professionalism and professional behavior: Conflicts in both definition and learning outcome. Eur J Int Med. 2009;20(8):e85-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2008.10.006.

4. Prieto-Miranda SE, Jiménez-Bernardino CA, Monjaraz- Guzmán EG, Esparza-Pérez RI. Profesionalismo en médicos de un hospital de segundo nivel. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2017;55(2):264-72.

5. Martínez-Arias MR. Psicometría: teoría de los test psicológicos y educativos. Madrid, España: Editorial Síntesis; 2005.

6. Pedrosa I, Suárez-Álvarez J, García-Cueto E. Evidencias sobre la Validez de Contenido: Avances Teóricos y Métodos para su Estimación. Acción Psicológica. 2013;10(2):3-20. doi: 10.5944/ap.10.2.11820

7. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2002;27(4):335-40. doi: 10.3102/10769986027004335