medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cardiología

ISSN 0188-2198 (Print)
En 2019, la Revista Mexicana de Cardiología cambió a Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science

Ver Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science


  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cardiol 2018; 29 (4)

Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty: clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with success in a Tertiary-Care Hospital in Mexico

Alvarado-Pérez GS, Palacios-Rodríguez JM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 22
Page: 159-167
PDF size: 237.41 Kb.


Key words:

Mitral valvuloplasty, rheumatic mitral stenosis, Inoue balloon.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Prevalence of mitral stenosis of rheumatic etiology has diminished. However, in Mexico there are some regions where still represents a health issue in productive population. Percutaneous valvuloplasty has become the treatment of choice in those with favorable anatomy. When successful immediate results are obtained, adequate long-term results are predicted. Objective: To determine the clinical and echocardiographic factors associated with the immediate success of percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Material and methods: A comparative and retrospective cross-sectional, observational study. Clinical records of patients treated with percutaneous valvuloplasty between 2000-2016 were reviewed. We studied clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural factors associated with immediate success. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used with SPSS v2.4 package. Results: A total of 363 patients. Female gender 287 (79.1%), age 50.8 ± 10.9 years. Functional class II 218 (60.1%). Atrial fi brillation 201 (55.4%). Previous procedure 78 (21.5%). Wilkins score 8-10: 228 (62.8%). Previous moderate mitral insufficiency 20 (5.5%). Inoue Balloon used in 343 (94.5%). We achieved success in 309 (85.1%), 26 had complications (7.16%), one death. We observed an increased number of complications in patients with pulmonary hypertension (› 60 mmHg) (p = 0.01), transvalvular gradient (mean › 10 mmHg) (p = 0.049), previous moderate mitral regurgitation (p = 0.001), and procedures with double-balloon (p = 0.001). We identified as unfavorable predictors of the procedure with statistical significance: Wilkins score 8-10 points (OR 2.6, 95% CI, 1.3-5.2) and previous moderate mitral regurgitation (OR 3.3, 95% CI, 1.28-8.93). Conclusion: Similar results were obtained with previous studies (success, complications and mortality). Only the Wilkins score greater than 8 points and the previous moderate mitral regurgitation were unfavorable predictors for the success of the procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Guía de práctica clínica, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la patología de la válvula mitral, México: Secretaria de Salud 2009.

  2. Hershson A, Bermann A, Santos D, Casabé H, Favaloro R, Guevara E y cols. Consenso de valvulopatías. Rev Argent Cardiol. 2007; 75 (4): 304-323.

  3. Liaqat A, Naeem A, Rehan R, Maqbool H. Procedural success and immediate results, a tertiary care hospital experience from developing country. Professional Med J. 2016; 23 (1): 104-113.

  4. Ángeles-Valdés J, Uruchurtu Chavarín E. Valvuloplastía mitral percutánea. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2005; 75 (3): 350-362.

  5. Ben Farhat M, Ayari M, Maatouk F, Betbout F, Gamra H, Jarra M et al. Percutaneous balloon versus surgical closed and open mitral commissurotomy seven-year follow-up results of a randomized trial. Circulation. 1998; 97 (3): 245-250.

  6. Nobuyoshi M, Arita T, Shirai S, Hamasaki N, Yokoi H, Iwabuchi M et al. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty a review. Circulation. 2009; 119 (8): e211-e219.

  7. Bouleti C, Iung B, Laouénan C, Himbert D, Brochet E, Messika-Zeitoun D et al. Late results of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy up to 20 years. Circulation. 2012; 125 (17): 2119-2127.

  8. Palacios I, Arzamendi D. Percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty for patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis. Intervent Cardiol Clin. 2012; 1: 45-61.

  9. Mohamed Eid Fawzy. Mitral balloon valvuloplasty. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2010; 22 (3): 125-132.

  10. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, Antunes MJ, Barón- Esquivias G, Baumgartner H y cols. Guía de práctica clínica sobre el tratamiento de las valvulopatías. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2013; 66 (2): 131.e1-e42.

  11. Song JK, Song JM, Kang DH, Yun SC, Park DW, Lee SW et al. Restenosis and adverse clinical events after successful percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty: immediate post-procedural mitral valve area as an important prognosticator. Eur Heart J. 2009; 30 (10): 1254-1262.

  12. Sriram SNMJ, Venkata BJ, Sadagopan T, Ramamurthy MT. Immediate, intermediate and long term clinical outcomes of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2015; 6: 66-70.

  13. Palacios IF, Sanchez PL, Harrell LC, Weyman AE, Block PC. Which patients benefit from percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty? Prevalvuloplasty and postvalvuloplasty variables that predict long-term outcome. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1465-1471.

  14. Jorge E, Pan M, Baptista R, Romero MA, Ojeda S, Suárez de Lezo J et al. Predictors of very late events after percutaneous Mitral valvuloplasty in patients with mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 117 (12): 1978- 1984.

  15. Fawzy ME, Fadel B, Al-Sergani H, Al Amri M, Hassan W, Abdulbaki K et al. Long-term results (up to 16.5 years) of mitral balloon valvuloplasty in a series of 518 patients and predictors of long-term outcome. J Interv Cardiol. 2007; 20 (1): 66-72.

  16. Sarmiento RA, Blanco R, Gigena G, Lax J, Escudero AG, Blanco F et al. Initial Results and Long-Term Follow-up of Percutaneous Mitral Valvuloplasty in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension; Heart Lung Circ. 2017; 26 (1): 58-63.

  17. Joshi HS, Deshmukh JK, Prajapati JS, Sahoo SS, Vyas PM, Patel IV. Study of effectiveness and safety of percutaneous balloon mitral valvulotomy for treatment of pregnant patients with severe mitral stenosis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9 (12): 14-17.

  18. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Guyton RA et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation 2014; 129: 2440-2492.

  19. Dreyfus J, Cimadevilla C, Nguyen V, Brochet E, Lepage L, Himbert D et al. Feasibility of percutaneous mitral commissurotomy in patients with commissura mitral valve calcification. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35 (24): 1617- 1623.

  20. Picone BI, Carvalho SE, Trajano SR, de Oliveira PS, Salles NM, Labrunie P et al. Percutaneous mitral balloon valvotomy. Long-term outcome and assessment of risk factors for death and major events. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2005; 84 (5): 397-404.

  21. Kim MJ, Song JK, Song JM, Kang DH, Kim YH, Lee CW et al. Long-term outcomes of significant mitral regurgitation after percutaneous mitral valvuloplasty. Circulation. 2006; 114 (25): 2815-2822.

  22. Flores FJ, Ledesma VM, Palomo VJ, Montoya GS, Estrada GJ, Astudillo SR y cols. Resultados a largo plazo de la valvuloplastía mitral percutánea con técnica de Inoue. Experiencia de 7 años del Hospital de Cardiología del CMN Siglo XXI. IMSS. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2006; 76 (1): 28-36.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cardiol. 2018;29