medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2018; 63 (4)

Preliminary results of the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss with middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge

Banda-González RI, Gallardo-Ollervides FJ, Moreno-Reynoso SA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 150-158
PDF size: 310.38 Kb.


Key words:

Middle ear implant, Sensorineural hearing loss, Hearing aid.

ABSTRACT

Background: The 20% of the hearing aid’s users are not complete satisfied, for this reason it is very important to consider other treatment options.
Objective: To present preliminary results of the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss with the middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge.
Material and Method: An observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study was done from January 1st 2017 to May 2018, with patients with bilateral moderate-severe sensorineural hearing loss, and despite of hearing aid presented poor discrimination to the voice, recurrent infectious pathology of external ear or occlusion sensation. The following studies were performed pre and postoperatively: audiometry logoaudiometry, tympanometry, functional gain and social utility index.
Results: There were included five patients. Functional gain of 8.5 dB was obtained with the use of the implant Vibrant Soundbridge, when compared with the conventional hearing aid, as well as better social utility index (11.7%) than with the use of auditory aids.
Conclusions: Middle ear implants are an alternative treatment for patients with sensorineural hearing loss who do not benefit from the use of conventional hearing aids or who, due to medical reasons, can not use them. It provides better tonal gain and better word discrimination than conventional hearing aids.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Orgnization. Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]. WHO: actualizado en febrero de 2017. Disponible en http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs300/en/

  2. Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2014. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2016;(260)10.

  3. Maniglia JA. Electromagnetic implantable middle ear hearing device of the ossicular stimulating type. Principles, designs and experiments. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1988;136:316.

  4. Magnan J, Manrique M, Dillier N, Snik A, Häusler R. International Consensus on middle ear implants. Acta OtoLaryngologica 2005;125(9):920-921.

  5. Channer AG, Eshraghi AA, Xue Z. Middle ear implants: Historical and futuristic perspective. J Otol 2011;6(2):10-18.

  6. Pelosi S, Carlson ML, Glasscock ME. The Ototronix MAXUM system: Indications, techniques, and outcomes. Operative techniques. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;25(4):338- 343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otot.2014.09.006

  7. Ribalta G, Díaz C. Prótesis auditivas implantables. Rev Med Clin Condes 2016;27(6):824-833 https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rmclc.2016.11.014

  8. Kozlowski K, Friedland DR. Implantable hearing devices. Curr Surg Rep 2014 May;2:59.

  9. Med-El Medical Electronics. Information for surgeons VORP 503. 2014. Available at: https://s3.medel.com/ downloadmanager/downloads/soundbridge_prof/en- GB/28488_1_1.pdf

  10. Bruchhage KL Leichtle A, Todt I, et al. Sistematic review to evaluate the safety, efficacy and economical outcomes of the Vibrant Soundbridge for the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2017 Abril; 274(4):1797-1806.

  11. Med-El Medical Electronics. Vibrant soundbridge middle ear implant system. 2014. Available at: http://s3.medel. com/downloadmanager/downloads/soundbridge_prof/ en-GB/28479.pdf

  12. MED-EL Medical Electronics. Safety outcomes for implantable bone conduction and middle ear devices: A systematic review. 2016. Austria.

  13. Grégoire A, Van Damme JP, Gilain C, Bihin B, Garin P. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Feb;45(1):66-72.

  14. Maier H, Hinze A, Gerdes T, et al. Long-term results of incus vibroplasty in patients with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss. Audiol Neurotol 2015 March;20(2):136-146.

  15. Pok SM, Schlögel M, Böheim K. Clinical experience with the active middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge in sensorineural hearing loss. Adv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 2010 Jul;69:51-8.

  16. Lee JH, Lee MJ, Young C, Jung JH. Evaluation of maximal speech intelligibility with Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2017;38 (XX):1-5.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2018;63