medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica MD

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med MD 2018; 9.10 (2)

Prevalence and risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to post-ligation ulcers

Aldana-Ledesma JM, López-Cota GA, Ibarra-Estrada MA, Rangel-Orozco MF, Mercado-Jáuregui LEC, Lazcano-Becerra M, Schmidt-Ramírez A, Rivera-Espíritu HJ, Quintero-Luce S, Gómez-Castaños PC, Velarde-Ruiz VJA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 125-130
PDF size: 566.28 Kb.


Key words:

Child Turcotte Pugh, cirrhosis, post-banding ulcer, thrombocytopenia, variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Variceal hemorrhage is the second most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). The most effective treatment for its management is through endoscopic ligation. In the process, the ligated varices ulcerate, which may trigger another hemorrhage event with increased morbidity and mortality. The objective of this work is to describe the frequency and risk factors associated with digestive hemorrhage secondary to post-ligation ulcers (PLU).
Material and Methods. This is an analytical and retrospective study, patients with UGIB hospitalized in the Gastroenterology service from August 2013 to May 2018 were included. Variables analyzed: age, gender, comorbidities, manifestations at admission, laboratorial characteristics, severity of liver disease, mortality. The numerical variables were compared between the groups with the Mann-Whitney U test due to their non-parametric distribution. And the categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact test. A ROC curve was constructed with the platelet variable to find the best equilibrium point between sensitivity and specificity to predict PLU with the Youden index. The risks calculated as OR are reported
Results. 648 patients were hospitalized for UGIB, being 175 of variceal origin and of these 16 (9.1%) by PLU. The comorbidities, clinical and laboratory manifestations were similar between the subgroups with and without PLU. The MELD score showed no association with the presence of PLU, however, patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh Hepatopathy (CTP) class C had an OR 2.9 (p = 0.04) to present PLU. With the platelet cut-off point calculated in the ROC curve (AUC 0.73, p = ‹0.0001), it was found that a level ‹123 103 cells/µl, is associated with an OR of 10.8 (p = 0.002) for hemorrhage of the UPL (Sensibility 87.5%, Specificity 62.5%), with a negative predictive value of 98%. It was also found that AKI is significantly associated with this complication (OR 6.0, p = 0.001).
Discussion. The reported prevalence 9.1% coincides with that reported worldwide (3.6-15%). We identified AKI, advanced chronic hepatopathy, CTP class C, and decreased platelets as independent risk factors for PLU hemorrhage. A platelet level greater than 123 103 cells/µl is a clear protective factor for hemorrhage.


REFERENCES

  1. 1.Van Leerdam ME. Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2008; 22 (2) : 209–224.

  2. D'Amico G, Morabito A, D'Amico M, Pasta L, Malizia G, Rebora P, et al. Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):563-576.

  3. Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes JG, Berzigotti A, Bosch J. Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2017;65(1):310-335

  4. De Franchis R, Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Workshop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2015; 63 (3): 743-52.

  5. Tier ney A, Toriz BE, Mian S, Brow KE. Interventions and outcomes of treatment of postbanding ulcer hemorrhage after endoscopic band ligation: a single-center case series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(1):136-140.e1.

  6. Lee SW, Lee TY, Chang CS. Independent factors associated with recurrent bleeding in cirrhotic patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(5):1128-34.

  7. Cho E, Jun CH, Cho SB, et al. Endoscopic variceal ligation-induced ulcer bleeding: What are the risk factors and treatment strategies? Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(24):e7157.

  8. Schmitz RJ, Sharma P, Badr AS, et al. Incidence and management of esophageal stricture formation, ulcer bleeding, perforation, and massive hematoma formation from sclerotherapy versus band ligation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(2):437-41

  9. Petrasch F, Grothaus J, Mössner J, et al. Differences in bleeding behavior after endoscopic band ligation: a retrospective analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010; 15;10:5.

  10. Bambha K, Kim WR, Pedersen R, et al. Predictors of early re-bleeding and mortality after acute variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Gut.

  11. D'Amico G, De Franchis R; Cooperative Study Group. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Posttherapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38(3):599-612.

  12. 12.Vanbiervliet G, Giudicelli-Bornard S, Piche T, et al. Predictive factors of bleeding related to post-banding ulcer following endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32(2):225-32.

  13. Bazeia Lima T, Faria Silva G, Gomes Romeiro F . Diagnosis, management and prophylaxis of bleeding related to post-esophageal variceal band ligation ulcer in cirrhotic patients. Case Reports in Internal Medicine. 2018 ;05: 23-31

  14. Sakr MA, El-Atty Hamed WA, MM El Gafaary, et al. Role of Sucralfate in Promoting Healing of Post Band Variceal Ulcer, Advances in Natural Science, 2011; 04: 07-14.

  15. Ibrahim M, Lemmers A, Devière J. Novel application of Hemospray to achieve hemostasis in post-variceal banding esophageal ulcers that are actively bleeding. Endoscopy. 2014;46 Suppl 1 UCTN:E263.

  16. Choudhary NS, Puri R, Saigal S, et al. Innovative Approach of Using Esophageal Stent for Refractory Post-Band Ligation Esophageal Ulcer Bleed Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016;6(2):149-50.

  17. Shaheen NJ, Stuart E, Schmitz SM, et al. Pantoprazole reduces the size of postbanding ulcers after variceal band ligation: a randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. 2005;41(3):588-94.

  18. Soliman GMM, Amer Y, Mostafa S. Comparative study between the efficacy of rebamipide, sucralfate and pantoprazole in treatment of post banding variceal ulcers. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal. 2015; 13 (1): 28-35.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med MD. 2018;9.10