medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica MD

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med MD 2018; 9.10 (2)

Evaluation of the BAROS model on the results of 1-year postoperative of patients with Sleeve and Gastric Bypass for the treatment of obesity

León-Quintero N, Llamas-Prieto LE, Rodriguez-Rodriguez G, Sánchez-Rentería M, León-Quintero-Loreto M, Hernandez-Vázquez M, Tello-Gálvez SL, Parada-Gallardo FJ, Moreno-Díaz EA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 143-149
PDF size: 622.92 Kb.


Key words:

bariatric surgery, obesity, roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) has been validated as the best comprehensive and objective evaluation system to assess the benefits of bariatric surgery. It considers different variables such as percentage of excess weight loss (% EWL), resolution and / or improvement of comorbidities, and postoperative quality of life. Complications of the procedure or surgical reoperations are also taken into account.
Material and Methods. The objective of the study was to create a comparison between Roux on Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and Gastric Sleeve (GS) to assess which of the two surgical techniques has the best outcomes according to the BAROS model. Of the 282 patients operated at San Javier Hospital between January 2011 and December 2016, only 66 agreed to consent to participate in the study. Of these patients, 37 were female and 29 male who were followed up at 6 and 12 months after surgery, 43 patients underwent RYGB and 23 GS.
Results. The pre-surgical average body mass index (BMI) was 38.9 kg / m2. The average age was 38 years and the %EWL was 69.5 for RYGB and 109.5 for GS. The majority of patients had improvement of their comorbidities. The quality of life according to the Moorehead- Ardelt questionnaire showed improvement in all patients. The evaluation with the BAROS score in the RYGB group was excellent in 93% and very good in 7% of patients. In the GS group, 87% obtained excellent results, 9% very good and 4% good.
Discussion. Both surgical approaches yielded excellent results of weight loss control in obese patients with associated comorbidities as well as improving their quality of life. These results demonstrate that BAROS is simple and quick evaluation tool for bariatric patients after surgery.


REFERENCES

  1. D González Hermosillo-Cornejo, DA Daniel Arreola-Ramiŕ ez, A Díaz Girón-Gidi, D A Álvarez- Hernández, C López-Caballero.Cirugía bariátrica y metabólica, una perspectiva histórica desde sus inicios. El Residente. 2016, Mayo; 11 (2): 88-95.

  2. K Changela, E Ofori, S Duddempudi, S Anand, S Singhal. Peroral Endoscopic Reduction of Dilated Gastrojejunal Anastomosis after Bariatric Surgery: Techniques and Efficacy. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2016, Feb; 8(4):239–243.

  3. I Al-Bader, M Khoursheed, K Al Sharaf, D A Mouzannar, A Ashraf, A Fingerhut. Revisional Laparoscopic Gastric Pouch Resizing for Inadequate Weight Loss After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obesity Surgery. 2015, Enero; 25(7): 1103–1108.

  4. S Bairdain, M Cleary,HJ Litman, BC Linden,DB Lautz. Revisional Bariatric Surgery. Journal Of Obesity and Bariatrics. 2015, Junio;2(2): 1-5.

  5. V K Papapietro. Reganancia de peso después de la cirugía bariátrica. Revista Chilena de Cirugía. 2012,Feb; 64( 1 ): 83-87.

  6. A Hollywood, J Ogden, M Hashemi. A Randomised Control Trial Assessing the Impact of an Investment Based Intervention on Weight-Loss, Beliefs and Behaviour after Bariatric Surgery: Study Protocol. BMC obesity. 2015,Marzo; 2(18).

  7. M P Cambi, S D Marchesini,G A Baretta. Postbariatric surgery weight regain: evaluation of nutritional profile of candidate patients for endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva. 2015; 28( 1 ): 40-43.

  8. González P. Julio Fernando, Gómez C Gonzalo, Arriagada P Genaro. Evaluación mediante score Baros de los resultados del bypass gástrico en el tratamiento de la obesidad mórbida. Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2006 Oct [citado 2017 Oct 12] ; 58( 5 ): 365-370.

  9. Mendes GA, Vargas GP. Quality of life after vertical gastrectomy evaluated by the baros questionnaire. Abcd, Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (Sao Paulo).[Internet]. 2017Mar ;30( 1 ): 14-17. .

  10. Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Obesity Suergery. 1998Jan;8(5):487-99

  11. OCDE. Obesity Update. 2017. Disponible desde: http://oment.uanl.mx/descarga/obesity-update- 2017_ocde.pdf

  12. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición de Medio Camino 2016, Secretaría de Salud octubre 2016.

  13. Mateo Gavira I., Vílchez López F.J., Cayón Blanco M., García Valero A., Escobar Jiménez L., Mayo Ossorio M. A. et al . Efecto del bypass gástrico sobre el riesgo cardiovascular y la calidad de vida en pacientes con obesidad mórbida. Nutr. Hosp.[Internet]. 2014Mar ;29( 3 ): 508-512.

  14. Barzallo Sánchez D, Guadalupe Rodríguez R, Flores Tamayo F, Aguayo Vistín W, Guadalupe Vallejo E. Evaluación de la calidad de vida post cirugía bariátrica mediante la aplicación del score de baros en el hospital general enrique garcés -quito. Enero –marzo 2013. Revista de la Facultad de ciencias médicas universidad de Cuenca. 2014;32(3):70-77




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med MD. 2018;9.10