medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 02

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2019; 87 (02)

Topical vaginal estrogen and vaginal vault dehiscence in patients rather than a laparoscopic total hysterectomy

Morgan-Ortiz F, Sosa-Atondo DG, Morgan-Ruiz FV, Soto-Pineda JM, Báez-Barraza J, Peraza-Garay FJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 93-99
PDF size: 215.27 Kb.


Key words:

Vaginal, Conjugated equine estrogens, Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, Vaginal lubricating cream, Dehiscence.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence in patients managed with and without conjugated equine estrogens vaginally prior to total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH).
Materials and Methods: In a single-blind controlled clinical trial, 236 patients with indications for laparoscopic total hysterectomy for benign pathology at the Hospital Civil de Culiacán and who agreed to participate in the study were randomly assigned to receive vaginally conjugated equine estrogens (study group) or vaginal lubricating cream as a placebo (control group) for 3 weeks prior to the procedure. Patients with diabetes mellitus, treated with steroids and history of a recent thromboembolic event were excluded. The frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence was evaluated at 7 and 30 days after surgery. The student's t-test was used to compare means and the Chi-square test was used to compare proportions, with relative risk (RR) calculation to evaluate the risk of vaginal cuff dehiscence.
Results: We studied 236 patients with average age, in both groups, 47.1 and 47.7 years, respectively (p › .05). The mean age of the patients was similar between the groups (47.1 vs 47.7 years, p›.05). The gynecological-obstetric history and indications for hysterectomy were similar between both groups (p = .340). The incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence was 2.5% (n = 3) in the group treated with conjugated equine estrogens vaginally and 6.8% (n = 8) in the patients of thse group treated with vaginal lubricant (p= .123; RM= .359; IC95%: .093-1.387).
Conclusions: The risk of presenting vaginal cuff dehiscence was similar between the group of lubricant and topical vaginal estrogens, but with a lower tendency in the frequency of vaginal cuff dehiscence in the group of topical estrogens.


REFERENCES

  1. Siedhoff MT, et al. Decreased incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence after laparoscopic closure with bidirectional barbed suture. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18(2):218- 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2011.01.002

  2. Koh RM, et al. Incidence and characteristics of patients with vaginal cuff dehiscence after robotic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114 (2), Part 1 :231-35. doi: 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e3181af36e3

  3. Ulcella S, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205(2):119e1- 119e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024

  4. Hur HC, et al. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14(3):311-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2006.11.005

  5. Hur HC, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118 (4): 794-801. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f1c92

  6. Jeung IC, et al. A prospective comparison of vaginal stump suturing techniques during total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010; 282 (6):631-38. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1300-0

  7. Hwang JA, et al. Vaginal cuff closure: a comparison between the vaginal route and laparoscopic suture in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2011;71 (3):163-9. https://doi. org/10.1159/000316052

  8. Morgan-Ortiz F, et al. Comparison between unidirectional barbed and polyglactin 910 suture in vaginal cuff closure in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surg Tech Int 2013;23(1):1-6.

  9. Gillian S, et al. Potential Role of Estrogens in Wound Healing. Am J Clin Dermatol 2003; 4 (11): 737-43. https://doi. org/10.2165/00128071-200304110-00002

  10. Ashcroft GS, Dodsworth J, Boxtel E. Estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing associated with an increase in TGB-β1 levels. Nat Med 1997; 3: 1209-15.

  11. Morales DE, et al. Oestrogen promotes angiogenic activity in human umbilical vein endotelial cells in vitro and in a murine model. Circulation 1995; 91: 755-63. https://doi. org/10.1161/01.CIR.91.3.755

  12. Shanker G, et al. Oestrogen modulates the inducible expression of platelet derived growth factor mRNA by monocytes/ macropaghes. Life Sci 1995; 56: 499-507. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(94)00479-C

  13. Ashcroft GS, et al. Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response. Am J Pathol 1999; 155: 1137-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65217-0

  14. Sato T, et al. Hormonal regulation of collagenolysis in uterine cervical fibroblast. Biochem J 1991; 275: 645-50. DOI: 10.1042/bj2750645

  15. Sandberg EM, et al. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24(2): 206- 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.020

  16. Belull S, et al. Transvaginal Management of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence with Bowel Evisceration following Delayed Diagnosis. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2017; 4985382. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4985382

  17. Misirlioglu S, Boza A, Arslan T, Urman B Taskiran C. Unidirectional barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure without backward stitch in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13696

  18. Fuchs Weizman N, et al. Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and associated morbidities. JSLS. 2015;19(2). doi: 10.4293/ JSLS.2013.00351

  19. Kim SM, et al. The use of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;297(3):691-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4637-9

  20. Karacan T, et al. Comparison of barbed unidirectional suture with figure-of-eight standard sutures in vaginal cuff closure in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2017.1416597

  21. Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic vs transvaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized trial by the Italian Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218 (5): 500.e1-500.e13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.029

  22. Aydogmus H, et al. Cuff closure by vaginal route in TLH: Case Series and review of literature. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(3): QD01-QD03. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25056.9447.

  23. Shen Z, et al. Estradiol regulation of nucleotidases in female reproductive tract epithelial cells and fibroblasts. PLoS One. 2013; 8(7): e69854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069854




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2019;87