medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2006, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Cir Gen 2006; 28 (3)

Cardiac transplant. Histological and echocardiographic findings during rejection

Rodríguez-Ortega MF, Archundia GA, Díaz QG, Aceves CJL
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 30
Page: 160-164
PDF size: 47.01 Kb.


Key words:

Cardiac transplant, endomyocardial biopsy, echocardiogram.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe the relation between the echocardiographic and histological changes during acute rejection of cardiac transplants.
Setting: Nacional Medical Center “20 de Noviembre” ISSSTE.
Design: Trasversal, observational, descriptive, retrolective study.
Statistics: Central tendency and dispersion measures, Spearman’s rho, and sensitivity, specificity, positive and negativa predictive values.
Patients and method: Clinical records of 11 patients with cardiac transplant performed between August 1990 and August 2005. Analyzed variables were: gender, age, etiology of the cardiopathy, functional class according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA), histological and echocardiographic findings, immunologic rejection according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation of 1990 and 2004.
Results: Nine patients were men, all with antecedent of idiopatic dilated cardiomyopathy, age range from 25 to 57 years, class NYHA III (n = 4) and IV (n = 7). After the transplantation and at the moment of getting the information from the clinical record, only patient 11 was found in class IV, the remainder was in functional class II. Endocardial biopsies revealed a slight degree of rejection in 6 patients, moderate in two, one patient with severe, and two patients revealed no rejection. Tricuspid failure was graded as slight to moderate in patients 2, 5, and 8, and of severe in patient 11. Immunological rejection due to altered time of isovolumetric relaxation of the left ventricle, valve dysfunction, and low ejection fraction was found in 2, 5, 7, and 11. With a 0.72 (p ‹ 0.04) immunological rejection and with a 0.62 (p ‹ 0.05) rejection degree by Spearman’s rho, sensitivity of 75%, positive predictive value of 75%.
Conclusion: The time of isovolumetric relaxation and valve dysfunction determined by conventional echocardiography depict a good relation with the histological findings and can be useful for the diagnosis of immunological rejection in patients with cardiac transplant.


REFERENCES

  1. Carrel A, Guthrie CC. The transplantation of veins and organs. Am Med 1905; 10: 1101.

  2. Barnard CN. The operation. A human cardiac transplant: an interim report of a successful operation performed at Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town. S Afr Med J 1967; 41: 1271-4.

  3. Caves PK, Stinson EB, Billingham M, Shumway NE. Percutaneous transvenous endomyocardial biopsy in human heart recipients. Experience with a new technique. Ann Thorac Surg 1973; 16: 325-35.

  4. Stewart S, Winters GL, Fishbein MC, Tazelaar HD, Kobashigawa J, Abrams J, et al. Revision of the 1990 working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart rejection. J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24: 1710-20.

  5. Burgess MI, Bhattacharyya A, Ray SG. Echocardiography after cardiac transplantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 917-25

  6. Taylor DO, Edwards LB, Boucek MM, Trulock EP, Keck BM, Hertz MI. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-first official adult heart transplant report—2004. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004; 23: 796-803.

  7. Brunner-La Rocca HP, Sutsch G, Schneider J, Follath F, Kiowski W. Natural course of moderate cardiac allograft rejection (International Society for Heart Transplantation grade 2) early and late after transplantation. Circulation 1996; 94: 1334-38.

  8. Fishbein M, Kobashigawa J. Biopsy-negative cardiac transplant rejection: etiology, diagnosis, and therapy. Current Opin Cardiol 2004; 19: 166-69.

  9. Dandel M, Hummel M, Müller J, Wellnhofer E, Meyer R, Solowjowa N, et al. Reliability of tissue Doppler wall motion monitoring after heart transplantation for replacement of invasive routine screenings by optimally timed cardiac biopsies and catheterizations. Circulation 2001; 104: 184-90.

  10. Romano P, Mangion JM. The role of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography in heart transplantation. Echocardiography 2002; 19: 599-604.

  11. Venkateswaran RV, Bonser RS, Steeds RP. The echocardiographic assessment of donor heart function prior to cardiac transplantation. Eur J Echocardiogr 2005; 6: 260-3.

  12. Suriani RJ. Transesophageal echocardiography during organ transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12: 686-94.

  13. Nguyen V, Cantarovich M, Cecere R, Giannetti N. Tricuspid regurgitation after cardiac transplantation: how many biopsies are too many? J Heart Lung Transplant 2005; 24: S227-231.

  14. DeSimone R, Lange R, Sack FU, Mehmanesh H, Hagl S. Atrioventricular valve insufficiency and atrial geometry after orthotopic heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: 1686-1693.

  15. Lewen MK, Bryg RJ, Miller LW, Williams GA, Labovitz AJ. Tricuspid regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography after orthotopic cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1987: 59: 1371-1374.

  16. Valantine HA, Appleton CP, Hatle LK, Hunt SA, Billingham ME, Shumway NE, et al. A hemodynamic and Doppler echocardiographic study of ventricular function in long-term cardiac allograft recipients. Etiology and prognosis of restrictive-constrictive physiology. Circulation 1989; 79: 66-75.

  17. Rosas ME. Función ventricular izquierda. En: Rosas ME. Ecocardiografía: metodología, diagnóstico y aplicación clínica. México, DF, Editorial El Manual Moderno, 2004, 89-100.

  18. Eun LY, Gajarski RJ, Graziano JN, Ensing GJ. Relation of left ventricular diastolic function as measured by echocardiography and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure to rejection in young patients (‹ 31 years) after heart transplantation. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 857-860.

  19. Stevenson LW, Dadourian BJ, Kobashigawa J, Child JS, Clark SH, Laks H. Mitral regurgitation after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1987: 60: 119-122.

  20. Yun KL, Niczyporuk MA, Daughters GT 2nd, Ingels NB Jr, Stinton EB, Alderman EL, et al. Alterations in left ventricular diastolic twist mechanics during acute human cardiac allograft rejection. Circulation 1991; 83: 962-73.

  21. Aziz TM, Burgess MI, Haselton PS, Yonan NA, Hutchinson IV. Transforming growth factor beta and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction after heart transplantation: echocardiographic and histologic evidence. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003; 22: 663-73.

  22. Eroglu E, Herbots L, Van Cleemput J, Droogne W, Claus P, D’hooge J, et al. Ultrasonic strain/strain rate imaging-a new clinical tool to evaluate the transplanted heart. Eur J Echocardiogr 2005; 6: 186-95.

  23. Malhotra A, Khouzam RN, Minderman D, D’Cruz IA. Sonolucent space posterior to left atrium: unusual echocardiographic appearance in a cardiac transplant patient. Echocardiography 2005; 22: 603-05.

  24. Eisen HJ, Tuzcu EM, Dorent R, Kobashigawa J, Mancini D, Valentine-von Kaeppler HA, et al. Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients. A autopsy study. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 847-858.

  25. Deng MC. Cardiac transplantation. Heart 2002; 87: 177-184.

  26. Palka P, Lange A, Galbraith A, Duhig E, Clarke BE, Parsonage W, et al. The role of left and right ventricular early diastolic Doppler tissue echocardiographic indices in the evaluation of acute rejection in orthotopic heart transplant. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 107-15.

  27. Ozduran V, Yamani MH, Chuang HH, Sipahi I, Cook DJ, Sendrey D, et al. Survival beyond 10 years following heart transplantation: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 4509-12.

  28. Martínez GE, Calderón AM, Zetina TH, Bonilla RLC, Holm CA, Jiménez DA, et al. Experiencia con trasplante cardiaco: Hospital General Centro Médico Nacional “La Raza”, IMSS. Cir Gen 2002; 24: 140-3.

  29. Politi P, Piccinelli M, Poli PF, Klersy C, Campana C, Goggi C, et al. Ten years of “extended” life: quality of life among heart transplantation survivors. Transplantation 2004; 78: 257-263.

  30. Dib-Kuri A, Aburto-Morales S, Espinoza-Alvarez A, Sanchez- Ramirez O. Trasplante de órganos y tejidos en México. Rev Invest Clin 2005; 57: 163-69.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2006;28