Nunes OS, Gue MJ, Caravaca-Morera JA

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 45-54
PDF size: 219.58 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Research on clinical simulation in Brazil is recent and is expanding. To know the researches that are being developed in this area is of extreme importance for scholars of the subject. Objective: To characterize the researches on clinical simulation developed in theses and dissertations carried out in Brazil. Method: Integrative revision made in the Catalog of Thesis and Dissertations of CAPES (Coordination of Superior Level Staff Improvement). The search occurred in August 2018 using the expressions “clinical simulation” OR “realistic simulation”. Results: 28 master’s dissertations (65.1%) and 15 doctoral theses (34.9%) were completed between 2010 and 2017, predominantly from the southeastern and northeastern regions (86%), from nursing postgraduate program (62.8%), with a quantitative research design (69.81%) and mainly investigating the learning provided by the simulation for certain contents (37.2%). Conclusion: Research on clinical simulation in Brazil is recent and focuses on evaluating the efficacy of the method in the retention of specific contents. Nursing is leading the research on simulation and the qualitative approach is incipient. Little has been discussed about the pedagogical part of the method, just as there are no investigations about interdisciplinarity.

REFERENCES

1. Jones F, Passos-Neto CE, Braghiroli OFM. Simulação em educação médica: breve histórico e metodologia. PPCR. 2015, 1 (2): 56-63.

2. Rosen KR. The history of medical simulation. J Crit Care. 2008; 23 (2): 157-166.

3. Nickerson M, Pollard M. Mrs. Chase and her descendants: a historical view of simulation. Creat Nurs. 2010; 16 (3): 101-105.

4. Herrmann EK. Remembering Mrs. Chase. Before there were Smart Hospitals and Sim-Men, there was “Mrs. Chase”. Imprint. 2008; 55 (2): 52-55.

5. Mora-Quirós S, de Oliveira-Vargas MA. Simulação clínica: uma estratégia que articula práticas de ensino e pesquisa em enfermagem. Texto & Contexto Enfermagem. 2014; 23 (4): 813-814.

6. Vieira RQ, Caverni LMR. Manequim de simulação humana no laboratório de enfermagem: uma revisão de literatura. Hist Enferm Rev Eletrônica. 2011; 2 (1): 105-120.

7. Bland AJ, Topping A, Wood B. A concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2011; 31 (7): 664-670.

8. Araújo ALLS, Quilici AP. O que é simulação e por que simular. En: Quilici AP, Abrão K, Timerman S, Gutierrez F. Simulação clínica: do conceito à aplicabilidade. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu; 2012. pp. 1-16.

9. Amaya-Afanador A. Simulación clínica: “aproximación pedagógica de la simulación clínica”. Universitas Médica. 2010; 51 (2): 204-211.

10. de Souza-Teixeira CR, Kusumota L, Merizio-Martins Braga FT, Pirani-Gaioso V, Benedita dos Santos C, de Sousa e Silva VL, et al. O uso de simulador no ensino de avaliação clínica em enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2011; 20: 187-193.

11. Sasso-Mendes KD, de Campos-Pereira Silveira RC, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2008; 17 (4): 758-764.

12. Gomes CO. Entre orquídeas e girassóis: o laboratório de enfermagem na visão de estudantes. [Dissertação]. Natal: Centro de Ciências da Saúde da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. 2004. 106 p. Mestrado em Enfermagem. pp. 28, 39.

13. Jorge, BM, Almeida, RGS, Souza Jr VD. Tendências atuais na investigação em simulação. In: Martins JCA, Mazzo A, Mendes IAC, Rodrigues MA. A simulação no ensino de enfermagem. Ribeirão Preto: SOBRACEn; 2014.

14. Norman J. Systematic review of the literature on simulation in nursing education. ABNF J. 2012; 23 (2): 24-28.

15. Zapko KA, Ferranto MLG, Blasiman R, Shelestak D. Evaluating best educational practices, student satisfaction, and self-confidence in simulation: a descriptive study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018; 60: 28-34.

16. Woodruff K, OʼNeill SP, Walton-Moss BJ. Exploring APN students’ perceptions, self-confidence, and satisfaction with clinical simulation. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2017; 38 (6): 347-349.

17. McRae ME, Chan A, Hulett R, Lee AJ, Coleman B. The effectiveness of and satisfaction with high-fidelity simulation to teach cardiac surgical resuscitation skills to nurses. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017; 40: 64-69.

18. Negrão-Baptista RC, Amado-Martins JC, Carneiro Ribeiro Pereira MF, Mazzo A. Satisfação dos estudantes com as experiências clínicas simuladas: validação de escala de avaliação. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014; 22 (5): 709-715.

19. Williams B, Dousek S. The satisfaction with simulation experience scale (SSES): a validation study. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2012; 2 (3): 74-80.

20. Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Strømme H, Jamtvedt G. Simulation-based training for nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2017; 54: 6-20.