medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica

ISSN 2683-2348 (Electronic)
Federación Latinoamericana de Simulación Clínica y Seguridad del Paciente
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back

Simulación Clínica 2019; 1 (1)

Fourteen steps to introduce clinical simulation to the curricula in medicine and health sciences

Amaya-Afanador A
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/RSC191I

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/RSC191I
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/RSC191I

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 55-60
PDF size: 155.06 Kb.


Key words:

Clinical simulation, curriculum, didactic, evaluation, significant learning.

ABSTRACT

A model designed by the article’s author is proposed in order to introduce clinical simulation to the medical and health sciences curricula. This model focuses on 14 steps developed in two well differentiated sequential phases: eight steps corresponding to the initial phase (“exploratory”) and six corresponding to the second phase (“creative”). The objective is to generate a methodological strategy that supports teachers when requiring curricular reforms that imply the introduction of this didactic and evaluative strategy.


REFERENCES

  1. Bugaj TJ, Nikendei C. Practical clinical training in skills labs: theory and practice. GMS J Med Educ. 2016; 33: Doc63.

  2. Parmar S, Delaney CP. The role of proximate feedback in skills training. Surgeon. 2011; 9: S26-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.006. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.006.

  3. Weller JM, Nestel D, Marshall SD, Brooks PM, Conn JJ. Simulation in clinical teaching and learning. Med J Aust. 2012; 196: 594. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11474. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.5694/mja10.11474.

  4. Tobón S. Formación basada en competencias. Pensamiento complejo, diseño curricular y didáctica. 2.a ed. Bogotá: Ecoe ediciones; 2005.

  5. Ten Cate O, Chen HC, Hoff RG, Peters H, Bok H, van der Schaaf M. Curriculum development for the workplace using Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs): AMEE Guide No. 99. Med Teach. 2015; 37: 983-1002. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1060308.

  6. Kern DE, Thomas PA, Hughes MT. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. EUA: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2009.

  7. Ausubel DP, Novak JD, Hanesian H, Sandoval PM, Botero M. Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo. 2.ª ed. México: Trillas; 1983.

  8. Aggarwal R, Mytton OT, Derbrew M, Hananel D, Heydenburg M, Issenberg B, et al. Training and simulation for patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010; 19: i34-43.

  9. IIME Core Committee. Global minimum essential requirements for medical education. Med Teach. 2002; 24: 130-135.

  10. Stilson F. Psychometrics of OSCE standardized patient measurements. University of South Florida; 2009. Disponible en: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=2133429161&Fmt=7&clientId=23922&RQT=309&VName=PQD.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Simulación Clínica. 2019;1