2018, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Cubana Hematol Inmunol Hemoter 2018; 34 (4)
Cuban method to determine the percentage of calculated panel reactive antibodies
Chang MA, Marcell RL, Ustariz GCR, Bencomo HA
Language: Spanish
References: 5
Page: 41-43
PDF size: 37.97 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Hahn AB, Mackey M, Constantino D, Ata A, Chandolias N, Lopez-Soler R, et al. The new kid-ney allocation system does not equally advantage all very high cPRA candidates - A single center analysis. Hum Immunol. 2017;78(1):37-40.
Baxter-Lowe LA, Kucheryavaya A, Tyan D, Reinsmoen N. CPRA for allocation of kidneys in the US: More candidates ³98% CPRA, lower positive crossmatch rates and improved trans-plant rates for sensitized patients. Hum Immunol. 2016;77(5):395-402.
Cecka JM. Calculated PRA (CPRA): the new measure of sensitization for transplant candidates. Am J Transplant. 2010;10(1):26-9.
Chan YP, Wong MWK, Tang LWM, Guo M, Yang W, Ip P, et al. A simplified method of calcu-latingcPRA for kidney allocation application in Hong Kong: a retrospective study. Transpl Int. 2017;30(12):1234-42.
Tinckam KJ, Liwski R, Pochinco D, Mousseau M, Grattan A, Nickerson P, et al. cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator. Am J Transplant. 2015;15(12):3194-201.
Full text