Daniel GAB, Morales LS, López GS, Leal FRM

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 337-353
PDF size: 302.94 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Currently, clinical simulation has changed the teaching of medicine in favor of the experiential, meaningful based learning of doctors in training, that is why the objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of professionalism and communication in a scenario of clinical simulation with a standardized patient for 5th grade students of the degree of medical surgeon of the UNAM School of Medicine.
Methods: It is an observational, descriptive and cross-sectional study. A sample n = 387 (45.6% of the total) was obtained from fifth year students of the UNAM medical degree. A clinical simulation scenario with standardized patients was used, as well as a rubric to evaluate professionalism and communication. The statistical calculation was performed with the analysis of percentages by item and category.
Results: The database and statistical analysis of the 387 students was made with Excel, finding that the competence of professionalism is excellent in 62%, good in 33% and deficient in 5% of the population, while in the competence of communication is excellent in 60%, good in 37% and deficient in 3%.
Discussions: It is demonstrated that there is social justice, respect and confidentiality in the doctor-patient relationship, but there is a lack at the time of maintaining the patient’s autonomy, empathy and compassion principle. It is possible to evaluate the performance of professionalism and communication through clinical simulation.

REFERENCES

1. Narro Robles J. La herencia de Flexner: Las ciencias básicas, el hospital, el laboratorio, la comunidad. Gaceta Médica de México [Internet]. 2004 [citado 4/11/2017];140(1):52-55. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0016- 38132004000100009

2. Facultad de Medicina. Plan de Estudios 2010 y Programa Académico de la Licenciatura de Médico Cirujano. [Internet]. 2010 [citado 2/11/2017]. Disponible en: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/_documentos/planes/mc/PEFMUNAM.pdf

3. World Federation for Medical Education. Global Standards for Quality Improvement: Postgraduate Medical Education. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 4/11/2017]. Available from: https://wfme.org/standards/pgme/

4. Hamui Sutton L. Educación Médica y Profesionalismo. (1 ed.). México: Mc Graw Hill Education; 2017.

5. Hernández Escobar C, Hernández Camarena J, González González L. Formación en ética y profesionalismo para las nuevas generaciones de médicos. Dialnet. [Internet] 2010 [citado 5/12/2017];14(1):30-39. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5749749

6. Tena Tamayo C, Hernández Orozco F. La comunicación humana en la relación médico-paciente. (2ª Ed.). México: Prado; 2005.

7. Graue Wiechers E, Sánchez Mendiola M, Durante Montiel M, Rivero Serrano O. Educación en las residencias médicas. (1ª Ed.). México: ETM; 2010.

8. Durante Montiel I. La comunicación e interacción en el ejercicio médico. [Internet]. 2006 [citado 25/11/2017]. Disponible en: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/sms/seam2k1/2006/ago_01_ponencia.html

9. Dieckmann P. Using Simulations for Education, Training and Research. (1ª Ed.). Alemania: PABST; 2009.

10. Riley R. Manual of Simulation in Healthcare. (1ª Ed.). Inglaterra: Oxford University Press; 2010.

11. Fajardo Dolci G. La simulación en las ciencias de la salud. Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, UNAM [Internet] 2017 [citado 27/11/2017]; 1:1-112. Disponible en: http://www.revistafacmed.com/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=file&id =966:la-simulacin-en-las-ciencias-de-la-salud&Itemid=79

12. Solís I, Bozzo S, Kunakov N. Pacientes estandarizados en la formación de habilidades clínicas, en educación médica de pregrado. Revista Médica de Chile [Internet]. 2013 [citado 10/11/2017];141(9):1216-1217. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/rmc/v141n9/art17.pdf

13. Lopreiato J, Downing D, Gammon W. Healthcare Simulation Dictionary. (1 ed.). [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2016 [cited 8/12/2017]. Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/sim-dictionary.pdf

14. Herron E, Nemeth J, Powers K. Community Health Simulation with a Standardized Patient: Exploring the Experience. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. [Internet]. 2017 [cited 6/12/2017];13(7):331-337. Available from: https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1876139917300464?token=961333D879F 35706175BEAD476AF8DBAEDAD8AE16815143075977FB854E4CFBD6177EC13 DAD1DED957937EB877EBC1E8

15. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation & Learning, I.N.A.C.S.L. Standards of Best Practice: Simulation SM Simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing [Internet].2016 [cited 2/11/2017];12(S):5-12. Available from: https://www.inacsl.org/INACSL/documentserver/? cfp=INACSL/assets/File/public/standards/SOBPEnglishCombo.pdf

16. Ruiz Moral R, Caballero Martínez F. Programa para seleccionar y entrenar pacientes estandarizados en el contexto de un currículo universitario de simulación clínica. Revista de la Fundación Educación Médica. [Internet]. 2014 [citado 26/11/2017];17(4): 199-204. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4321/S2014- 98322014000400005

17. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Rúbrica de Evaluación de la competencia del médico residente en la entrevista médica. [Internet]. 2013 [citado 26/11/2017]. Disponible en: http://www.fmposgrado.unam.mx/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2- Entrevista-médica-21.pdf

18. Facultad de Medicina, UNAM. Rúbrica de Evaluación del profesionalismo en el médico residente. [Internet]. 2013 [citado16/6/2017]. Disponible en: http://www.fmposgrado.unam.mx/wordpress/wpcontent/ uploads/2013/10/rubrica_profesionalismo.pdf