medigraphic.com

2018, Number 2

Next >>

Cuba y Salud 2018; 13 (2)

Assessment of electro chemistry method for International Normalization Reason determination

Cala FJ, Gondres LKM, Robert TV, Delisle BX, Naranjo LY, Rodríguez BS

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 6-10
PDF size: 1081.63 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objectives: to evaluate the usefulness of Coaguchek XS Pro to determine the Protombine / INR time and compare the values of the International Normalized Ratio obtained by electrochemical method, in correspondence with the reference method.
Methods: a descriptive study of 420 patients with adjusted doses of oral anticoagulants was carried out in the haemostasis laboratory of the Clinical Laboratory Department of the “Saturnino Lora Torres” Provincial Hospital in Santiago de Cuba, from May to June. 2016. Student’s t-test and correlation measures were applied.
Results: from the total of samples 388 cases 93.2% coincided for a high level of significance and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.93 was obtained between the electrochemical and electromagnetic methods.
Conclusions: it is concluded that the determination of the International Normalized Ratio using Coaguchek XS Pro is satisfactory compared to the standard method in the therapeutic range, although the higher the value of the International Normalized Ratio, the greater the differences between them.


REFERENCES

  1. Rodríguez Borges S, Durañones Góngora S, Castillo Martínez JM, Romero García LI, Gondres Legró KM. Variaciones de la Razón Normalizada Internacional en pacientes con prótesis valvulares complicados. MEDISAN 2017; 21(4):460. Disponible en: http:// scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php

  2. Coagulómetros portátiles. Revisión de la evidencia científica y evaluación económica de su uso en el autocontrol del tratamiento anticoagulante oral. IN06/2003. Disponible en : www.etsad.fr/etsad/afficher_lien.php

  3. Duboscq C, Ceresetto JM, Stemmelin G, Shanley C, Rabinovich O, Palmer S et al. Evaluación del desempeño de un dispositivo portátil para la determinación de la razón internacional normatizada en una clínica de anticoagulación. HEMATOLOGÍA. 2014;18(3):204-210. Disponible en: http://www.sah.org.ar/revista/numeros/vol.18n.3.204.210.pdf

  4. CoaguChek XS. El coagulómetro portátil de nueva generación para el autocontrol de INR. [Artículo en línea]. 2016. Disponible en: http://www.coaguchek.com/resource.php

  5. Candela Thoa AM. Validación de aparatos y métodos de medida: concordancia sí, correlación no. MedClin (Barc). Disponible en : www.elsevier.es/es-revista-semergen-medicina-familia-40-pdf-S1138359301740130-S300

  6. Gregory C, Sephel, Laposata M. A Case Study Demonstrating the Need for Ongoing Correlation of POC With the Central Laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013; 140:475-486. Disponible en : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24045543

  7. Beynon C, Jakobs M, Rizos T, Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW. Rapid bedside coagulometry prior to urgent neurosurgical procedures in anticoagulated patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2014;28(1):29-33. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24313307

  8. Consenso: VII Conferencia de Terapia Antitrombótica del American Collage of Chest Physicians (ACCP). 2004.

  9. Kalcık M, Yesin M, OzanGu¨ rsoy M, Gu¨ndu¨ z S, Karakoyun S, Astarcıoglu M et al. Comparison of the INR Values Measured by CoaguChek XS Coagulometer and Conventional Laboratory Methods in Patients on VKA Therapy. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/ Hemostasis. 2016 Disponible en : https://www.researchgate.net/

  10. Dawn E Havrda, Toni L Hawk, Carrie M Marvin. Accuracy and Precision of the CoaguChek S versus Laboratory INRs in a Clinic. Ann Pharmacother. 2002;36(5): 769-775. Disponible: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11978150

  11. Donaldson M, Sullivan J, Norbeck A. Comparison of international normalized ratios provided by two point-of-care devices and laboratory-based venipuncture in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2010;67(19): 1616- 1622. Disponible en : www.medscape.com/viewarticle/

  12. Duboscq C, Ujhelly C, Mainetti G. Estudio Comparativo multicéntrico del RIN en Coagucheck XS vs equipos automatizados. XI Congreso del Grupo Argentino de Hemostasia. [Poster Nro 37]. Argentina.2014

  13. Hur M, Kim H, Park CM, LaGioia A, Choi SG, Choi JH et al. Comparison of international normalized ratio measurement between CoaguChek XS Plus and STA-R coagulation analyzers. Biomed Res Int. 2013. Disponible en: http://biblioteca.universia.net/html_ bura/ficha/params/title/comparison-of-international-normalized-ratio-measurement-between-coaguchek-xs-plus/id/64023298. html

  14. Myung-Hyun N, Kyoung Ho R, Hui-Nam P, Chang Kyu L, Young-Hoon K, Kap No L, et al. Evaluation of the Roche CoaguChek XS Handheld Coagulation Analyzer in a Cardiac Outpatient Clinic. Ann Clin Lab Sci Winter. 2008;38(1):37-40.Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18316780

  15. Caballero-Villarraso J, Villegas-Portero R, Rodríguez-Cantalejo F. Dispositivos de coagulometría portátil en el seguimiento y control ambulatorio de la terapia anticoagulante oral: revisión sistemática. Aten Primaria. 2011; 43(3):148-156. Disponible en : www.elsevier.es




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com