medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Patología Clínica y Medicina de Laboratorio

ISSN 0185-6014 (Print)
Órgano oficial de difusión de la Federación Mexicana de Patología Clínica, AC y de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Patología Clínica/Medicina de Laboratorio
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab 2019; 66 (2)

Measurement uncertainty in medical analysis laboratories

Carboni HR, Sáenz FK
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 68-73
PDF size: 217.11 Kb.


Key words:

Uncertainty, clinical laboratories, models, ISO, Nordtest.

ABSTRACT

A brief historical review of the measurement uncertainty estimation models that have been proposed for the clinical laboratory in recent years as a way to satisfy requirement 5.5.1.4 ISO 15189.2012 is carried out. The compilation begins with the generic model GUM, in the «Bottom-Up» mode, adapted to the chemistry by EURACEHM, which when required to evaluate the uncertainty from its basic components, made it complex, difficult to apply to the routine of laboratories and without practical application. This is followed by simplified models of the «Top-Dowm» type, one proposed by the Royal College of Australasian Pathologists (RCPA) and then by the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine (SEQCML), which prioritize the contribution of intermediate precision in the medium term and add other contributions such as the uncertainty of the calibrator and eventually the one corresponding to the correction factor of the systematic error. The experimental application of this model demonstrates that expanded uncertainty remains virtually constant over the long term and does not reflect the behavior of analytical processes when evaluating data obtained from intercomparisons. These concepts are present in ISO Guide DTS 20914:2018 which is in a very preliminary stage of development. The uncertainty estimation mechanism proposed by Nordtest is then evaluated, which includes the intermediate precision data obtained from the internal quality control routine and the bias obtained from the results of the intercomparison tests, experimentally showing that with respect to the other models, it more realistically reflects the behavior of the long-term analysis procedures. The Workshop considers proposing the inclusion of the Nordtest model to the ISO DTS Guide 20914:2018, as an alternative calculation procedure.


REFERENCES

  1. Westgard JO. The meaning and application of total error. https://www.westgard.com/essay111.htm visitado septiembre 2018.

  2. ISO 15189.2003 Medical laboratories. Particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO Ginebra-Suiza.

  3. ISO 15189 2012 Medical laboratories. Particular requirements for quality and competence. ISO Ginebra-Suiza.

  4. Rainer Haeckel, Werner Wosniok, Ebrhard Gurr and Burkhard Peil. Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015.

  5. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html visitado septiembre 2018.

  6. CG 4 EURACHEM / CITAC Cuantificación de la Incertidumbre en Medidas Analíticas https://www.eurachem.org/index.php/publications/guides/quam#translations visitado. Septiembre 2018.

  7. Linko S1, Ornemark U, Kessel R. Taylor evaluation of measurement uncertainty in clinical chemistry applications to determinations of total concentration of calcium and glucose in human serum. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002; 40 (4): 391-398.

  8. Badrick T, Stewart P. Measurement Uncertainty. Common Sense Pathology 2015. https://www.rcpa.edu.au/getattachment/463e837a-6674-41ca-9284-19b5d1096ad3/Measurement-Uncertainty.aspx visitado septiembre 2018.

  9. Gella TF, Canalias RF, Izquierdo AS, Martínez VV, Sánchez MM. Recomendaciones para la estimación de la incertidumbre de medida en el laboratorio clínico Sociedad Española de Bioquímica Clínica y Patología Molecular. Disponible en: https://www.infobioquimica.com/radio/img/Recomendaciones%20para%20la%20estimaci%C3%B3n%20de%20la%20incertidumbre%20de%20medida%20en%20el%20laboratorio%20cl%C3%ADnico%20(2009).pdf visitado septiembre 2018.

  10. Javier Gella. Trazabilidad e Incertidumbre de la Medición en el Laboratorio clínico. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona y Comisión de Metrología de la Sociedad Española de Bioquímica Clínica y Patología Molecular. España. Disponible en: www.ifcc.org/media/216090/Trazabilidad%20e%20incertidumbre.pdf visitado septiembre 2018.

  11. ISO/DTS 20914:2018 Medical laboratories-Practical guide for the estimation of measurement uncertainty.

  12. Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories (NT TR 537-Edition 3.1). Available in: httpp://www.nordtest.info/index.php/technical-reports/item/handbook-for-calculation-of-measurement-uncertainty-in-environmental-laboratories-nt-tr-537-edition-3.html.

  13. P903: Policy on Estimating Measurement Uncertainty for ISO 15189 Testing Laboratories. https://portal.a2la.org/guidance/est_mu_testing.pdf.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Patol Clin Med Lab. 2019;66