medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2019; 64 (4)

Age of detection of hearing loss and the impact on age of cochlear implantation from at Instituto Mexicano de Otología y Neurotología

Corvera BLG, Espinosa ACB, García CMA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/BC194C

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/BC194C
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/BC194C

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 248-251
PDF size: 180.85 Kb.


Key words:

Hearing loss, hearing screening test, cochlear implant.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: According to the World Health Organization, 10% of the population has some hearing loss and two of every 1,000 persons has profound hearing loss. The restricted auditory screening program is directed exclusively to children with one or more risk factor associated to hearing loss, but congenital hearing loss is not always related to risk factors. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine if there has been changes in age of detection of hearing loss in the years that the hearing screening test was running in the country and its use was communicated among health professionals and patients. Material and methods: We selected all the children evaluated at Instituto Mexicano de Otología y Neurotología, S.C. between 1988 and 2019 who had presented with congenital hearing loss. Results: We analyzed 1,376 clinical files, 45% had cochlear implants, the ages of presentation at first consultation ranged from five month until 48 years; 6.9% of patients had prematurity as risk factor. Year of birth was not an important factor determining the percentage of patients with cochlear implants but the age of diagnosis was. Conclusion: The age of diagnosis of hearing loss in our country has decreased, but it has not had huge impact on results. If the government continues these practices the right to health is not properly covered.


REFERENCES

  1. Concha-Barrientos M, Campbell-Lendrum D, Steenland K. Occupational noise: assessing the burden of disease from work-related hearing impairment at national and local levels. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. [WHO Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 9].

  2. Semenov YR, Yeh ST, Seshamani M, Wang NY, Tobey EA, Eisenberg LS et al. Age-dependent cost-utility of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2013; 34 (4): 402-412.

  3. Berruecos-Villalobos P. Tamiz auditivo neonatal e intervención temprana. México: Academia Nacional de Medicina; 2014. pp. 3-5.

  4. Berruecos VP. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de los problemas de audición y lenguaje. En: Narro RJ, López BJ, Rivero SO ed. Diagnóstico y tratamiento en la práctica médica. Capítulo 12. 4a ed. México: EL manual Moderno y UNAM; 2011. pp. 105-117.

  5. Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoustic Soc Am. 1978; 64 (5): 1386-1391.

  6. Berruecos-Villalobos P. Tamiz auditivo neonatal e intervención temprana. México: Academia Nacional de Medicina; 2014. pp. 41-46.

  7. Cowan RSC, Edwards B, Ching TYC. Longitudinal outcomes of children with hearing impairment (LOCHI): 5 year data. Int J Audiol. 2018; 57 (sup2): S1-S2.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2019;64