medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 2

Revista Cubana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular 2019; 20 (2)

Effectiveness and durability of long-term carotid endarterectomy

Puig AD, Mussenden OE, Peguero BY, García LML, Díaz HO
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page:
PDF size: 142.82 Kb.


Key words:

carotid disease, cerebrovascular extracranial disease, carotid endarterectomy, atherosclerosis, restenosis, vascular risk factors.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Cardiovascular events constitute a global health problem with a growing tendency. Nowadays, they represent the third cause of death.
Objective: To describe the effectiveness and durability of long-term carotid endarterectomy in the extracranial carotid disease.
Methods: A descriptive, ambispective study was conducted in 44 patients subjected to 52 carotid endarterectomies that were performed in the service of Angiology and Vascular Surgery of "Hermanos Ameijeiras" Teaching-Clinical- Surgical Hospital. A clinical follow-up was performed with Doppler ultrasonography to all the patients. The period analyzed was eight years. The variables considered were: sex, age, associated risk factors, clinical category, topographical localization of the lesions, late complications, time of permeability and postsurgical results.
Results: Male sex predominated (68,2 %). Asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid lesions represented 50% respectively. The smoking habit and dyslipidemia were the most common risk factors. There was predominance of late complications (55,8%) being notable the carotid restenosis (n = 21). The average time of primary permeability of the revascularized sector was five years. 86,5% of the patients followed in the long term showed satisfactory postsurgical results by not presenting ischemic neurological events or carotid lesions with hemodynamic impact.
Conclusions: Carotid endarterectomy is a safe procedure with low morbidity and peri-operative mortality that ensures a significant reduction in ischemic cerebrovascular disease´s rates in longterm follow-up with low incidence of late vascular and neurological complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Ministerio de Salud Pública de la República de Cuba (Minsap). Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. Centro Nacional de Información de Ciencias Médicas. Anuario estadístico de Salud 2017. La Habana: Minsap; 2018. Acceso:10/04/2018. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://bvscuba.sld.cu/anuarioestadistico- de-cuba [ Links ]

  2. Toledo VSA, Rojas RGA, Alonso QHT, Pantoja MC. Morbi-mortalidad en endarterectomías carotideas. Rev Mex Angiol. 2011;39(4):153-15. [ Links ]

  3. Pujol L, Virginia A, Sebastián A, Povedano Guillermo P, Lagos R, Ameriso Sebastián F. Morbi-mortalidad de la endarterectomía carotídea. Medicina. (B. Aires) 2011;71(5):449-53. Acceso: 22/10/2012. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0025- 76802011000700007&lng=es [ Links ]

  4. Castilla JM, Delgado P, Martín V, Fernández-Arconada O, Martín-Santidrián MA, Rodríguez-Salazar A. Morbi-mortalidad en la endarterectomía carotidea. Neurocirugía. 2005;16(2):93-107. Acceso: 01/05/2018. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S11301473200500020000 1&lng=es [ Links ]

  5. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, et al. Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: (executive summary(. Circulation. 2011;124:489-532. doi: 10.1161/?CIR.0b013e31820d8d78 [ Links ]

  6. Herrera Flores HT, Llamas Macías FJ, Ramos López R, Nuño Escobar C, Sánchez Enciso MA, Martínez Macías CG. Estenosis carotídea asintomática en claudicación de extremidades inferiores. Rev Mex Angiol. 2011;39(1):4-12. [ Links ]

  7. Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD001081. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001081.pub2. [ Links ]

  8. Royo-Serrando J, Escribano-Ferrer JM, Juan-Samsó J, Álvarez-García B, Fernández- Valenzuela V, Matas-Docampo M. Re-estenosis carotidea tras endarterectomía: factores pronósticos. Angiología. 2002;54:326-32. [ Links ]

  9. Perez Baztarrica G, Diplotti C, Reolón E, Covello G, Blanco N, Fernández J, et al. Pseudoaneurysm of the Carotid Artery: Severe Complication after Carotid Endarterectomy. Argentine J Cardiol. 2012;80:471-3. Access: 10/10/2018. Available at: Available at: https://www.sac.org.ar/wpcontent/ uploads/2014/04/2979.pdf [ Links ]

  10. Duque Santos A, Romero Lozano MA, Valdivia A, Fabregate Fuente M, Ocaña Guaita JL, Gandarias Zúñiga C. Resultados a corto y medio plazo en el tratamiento de estenosis carotídea sintomática mediante "stenting" versus endarterectomía carotídea. Angiología. 2017;69(1):12-17. Acceso: 20/10/2018. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308738558_Resultados_a_corto_y_med io_plazo_en_el_tratamiento_de_estenosis_carotidea_sintomatica_mediante_stenting_v ersus_endarterectomia_carotidea [ Links ]

  11. Schneider JR, Helenowski IB, Jackson CR, Verta MJ, Zamor KC, Patel NH, et al. A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the vascular quality initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(5):1216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.049. [ Links ]

  12. Lee JH, Suh BY. Comparative results of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;87(4):192-6. doi: 10.4174/astr.2014.87.4.192. [ Links ]

  13. Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, Sergentanis TN, Liapis CD. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and nonrandomised studies. Eur J Vasc Endovascr Sur. 2011;42(6):751-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.08.012. [ Links ]

  14. Han Y, Zhang J, Wu X, Jiang H, Gang Q, Shen S, et al. A comparative study on medium-long term results of conventional and eversion endarterectomy in management of carotid artery stenosis: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;94(7):510-6. [ Links ]

  15. Demirel S, Attigah N, Bruijnen H, Ringleb P, Eckstein HH, Fraedrich G, et al. Multicenter experience on eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke. 2012;43:1865-71. doi: 10.1161/?STROKEAHA.111.640102. Access: 2018/05/01. Available at: http://stroke.ahajournals.org [ Links ]

  16. Paraskevas KI, Robertson V, Saratzis AN, Naylor AR. Editor's Choice - An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following eversion vs. conventional carotid endarterectomy in randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018;55(4):465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.025. [ Links ]

  17. Yong-Peng D, Chang-Wei L, Xiao-Jun S, Yue-Xin C, Li-Long G, Yue-Hong Z, et al. Clinical analysis of two carotid endarterectomy procedures in treating carotid artery stenosis. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2014;36(2):131-4. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.2014.02.003. [ Links ]

  18. Yanfei C, Gang S, Liqun J, Yabing W, Yan M, Feng L. A study of carotid endarterectomy in a Chinese population: Initial experience at a single center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;126:88-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.08.025. [ Links ]

  19. Kumar R, Batchelder A, Saratzis A, AbuRahma AF, Ringleb P, et al. Restenosis after carotid interventions and its relationship with recurrent ipsilateral stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(6):766-75. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.02.016. [ Links ]

  20. Aramendi Arieta-Araunabeña C, Casco Aguilar C, Estallo Laliena L, Vega de Ceniga M, López San Martín M, Barba Vélez Á. Evolución natural de la re-estenosis tras endarterectomía carotidea. Rev Española de Angiología. 2015;67(4)273-8. doi.org/10.1016/j.angio.2014.10.009. [ Links ]

  21. Matas-Docampo M, Domínguez-González JM, Álvarez-García B, Valera-Valle J, Solanich-Valldaura T. Re-estenosis carotidea. Angiología. 2004;56 (Supl 1):S327-41. [ Links ]

  22. Moore WS. Etiología y detección no- invasiva de las re-estenosis post cirugía carotidea. En: MCR, editor. Symposium Internacional sobre Angiología y Cirugía Vascular (presente y futuro). Barcelona: Hospital de Bellvitge "Prínceps d'Espanya"; 1984. p. 99-101. [ Links ]

  23. Branchereau A. Coste- beneficio de la cirugía vascular en los 90. En: Capdevila JM., editor. Selección de candidatos para la técnica de endarterectomía por eversión. Barcelona, España: Bard Cardia and Impra Grafts; 1997. p.191245. [ Links ]

  24. Lindsay AC, Biasiolli L, Knight S, Cunnington C, Robson MD, Neubauer S, et al. Non-invasive imaging of carotid arterial re-estenosis using 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-16-5. Access: 2018/05/01. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24400841 [ Links ]




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Revista Cubana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular. 2019;20