medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Abanico Veterinario

ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2019; 9 (1)

Gas production in bovine feces adding tannins directly or on the diet

Murillo-Ayala E, Corona-Palazuelos M, Velázquez-Elenes E, Davicino RA, Romo-Rubio J, Enríquez-Verdugo I, Barajas-Cruz R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 1-12
PDF size: 985.66 Kb.


Key words:

tannins extract, feces, gas production, beef-cattle.

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were performed to determine the influence of (TE) tannins extract addition on gas production from beef-cattle feces. Experiment 1: fecal samples collected during four consecutive days from five bullocks placed in a pen, and an integrated pull sample/day. 100 g of feces was placed in 600 ml flasks, in a randomized complete block design into treatments: 1) Feces without TE addition (Control), and 2) Addition Dry Matter Basis (DB) with 7.4% of condensed TE (CT). In the second experiment, eighteen calves in a complete randomized block design were used treatments were: 1) diet without TE (Control), 2) Control plus 0.6% DB of CT, and 3) Control plus 0.6% DB of Hydrolyzable TE (HT) on a 28 days diet. Total of feces was incubated for 24 h in vitro, then gas production was measured, and the results analyzed by ANOVA. CT addition decreased by 44% gas production (P‹0.001). The TE addition does not modify gas production (P›0.50); results indicate that gas production decreases with the addition of TE on bovine feces, but, does not when TE is included in the diet.


REFERENCES

  1. ADEOLA O. 1999. Nutrient management procedures to enhance environmental conditions: An introduction. Journal of Animal Science. 77:427-429. DOI: 10.2527/1999.772427x

  2. ANALYTICAL SOFTWARE. Statistix User´s Manual, Release 9.0. Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL. 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.06.040 AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 1997. 16th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.

  3. ARCHIBEQUE SL, Miller DN, Freetly HC, Ferrell CL. 2006. Feeding high-moisture corn instead of dry-rolled corn reduces odorous compound production in manure of finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science. 84:1767-1777. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-448

  4. BAE HD, McAllister TA, Yanke J, Cheng KJ, Muir AD. 1993. Effects of condensed tannins on endoglucanase activity and filter paper digestion by Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. Applied and Environmental Microbiolgy. 59:2132-2138. DOI: 0099-2240/93/072132-07

  5. BARROS-RODRÍGUEZ M, Oña-Rodríguez J, Mera-Andrade R, Artieda-Rojas J, Curay- Quispe S, Avilés-Esquivel D, Solorio-Sánchez J, Guishca-Cunuhay C. 2017. Degradación ruminal de dietas a base de biomasa pos-cosecha de Amaranthus cruentus: efecto sobre los protozoos del rumen y producción de gas in vitro. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 28:812-821. DOI: 10.15381/rivep.v28i4.13931

  6. BEAUCHEMIN RA, McGinn SM, Martinez TF, McAllister TA. 2007. Use of condensed tannins extract from quebracho trees to reduce methane emission from cattle. Journal Animal Science. 85:1990-1996. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-686

  7. BERNAL L, Ávila P, Ramírez G, Lascano CE, Tiemann T, Hess H. 2008. Degradación de nutrientes y emisión de gases al fermentar ensilaje y heno de Calliandra calothyrsus y Vigna unguiculata en el sistema Rusitec. Asociación Latinoamericana de Producción Animal. 16:199-204. ISSN: 1022-1301.

  8. BESERRA LM, Leal CM, Maia S, Fernades AL, Freitas LT. 2011. Plantas taaniniferas e o controle de nematoides gastrintestinais de pequenos ruminantes. Ciencia Rural. 41:1967-1974. ISSN: 0103-8478.

  9. BRAKE DW, Titgemeyer EC, Bailey EA, Anderson DE. 2014. Small intestinal digestion of raw cornstarch in cattle consuming a soybean hull-based diet is improved by duodenal casein infusion. Journal Animal Science. 92:4047-4056. DOI: 10.2527/jas/2014-7908.

  10. CÁRDENAS PA. 2012. Efectos de los taninos encontrados en las leguminosas tropicales utilizadas en la nutrición de rumiantes. Revista PECUS Colombia. (3):33-39. ISSN: 2145- 8308.

  11. CARDONA-IGLESIAS JL, Mahecha-Ledesma L, Angulo-Arizala J. 2016. Arbustivas forrajeras y ácidos grasos: estrategias para disminuir la producción de metano entérico en bovinos. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 28:273-288. ISSN: 1021-7444.

  12. CARMONA JC, Bolívar DM, Giraldo LA. 2005. El gas metano en la producción ganadera y alternativas para medir sus emisiones y aminorar su impacto a nivel ambiental y productivo. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 18:49-63. ISSN: 0120-0690.

  13. DHANOA MS, France J, Crompton LA, Mauricio RM, Kebreab E, Mills JAN, Sanderson R, Dijkstra J, López S. 2004. Technical note: A proposed method to determine the extent of degradation of a feed in the rumen from the degradation profile obtained with the in vitro gas production technique using feces as the inoculum. Journal Animal Science. 82:733-746. DOI: 10.1093/ansci/82.3.733

  14. DUVAL A, Averous L. 2016. Characterization and physicochemical properties of condensed tannins from Acacia catechu. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 64:1751-1760. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05671

  15. EBERT PJ, Bailey EA, Shreck AL, Jennings JS, Cole NA. 2017. Effect of condensed tannin extract supplementation on growth performance, nitrogen balance, gas emissions, and energetic losses of beef steers. Journal Animal Science. 95:1345-1355. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2016.0341

  16. FASS. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research and Teaching. 2010. 3th ed. Champaign, IL, USA: Federation of Animal Science Societies. ISBN 975-1- 831706-11-0 https://www.asas.org/ag_guide_3rded/HTML5/index.html

  17. FRUTOS P, Hervás G, Giráldez FJ, Mantecón AR. 2004. Tannins and ruminant nutrition. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 2:191-202. http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/sjar/article/view/73/0

  18. GILROYED BH, Li C, Reuter T, Bauchemin KA, Hao X, McAllister TA. 2015. Influence of distiller´s grains and condensed tannins in the diet of feedlot cattle on biohydrogen production from cattle manure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 40:6050-6058. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.014

  19. GRAINGER C, BEAUCHEMIN KA. 2011. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production?. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 166:308-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.021

  20. HENKE A, Dickhoefer U, Westreicher-Kristen E, Knappstein K, Molkentin J, Hasler M, Susenbeth A. 2016. Effect of dietary Quebracho tannin extract on feed intake, digestibility, excretion of urinary purine derivatives and milk production in dairy cows. Archives of Animal Nutrition. 71:37-53. DOI: 10.1080/1745039X.2016.1250541

  21. HICKS CR. 1973. Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments. Holt, Reinhardt and Wiston, New York. USA. ISBN 003080132x.

  22. HUANG XD, Liang JB, Tan HY, Yahya R, Ho YW. 2011. Effects of Leucaena condensed tannins of differing molecular weights on in vitro CH4 production. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 166:373-376. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.026

  23. HUNTINGTON GB, Harmon DL, Richards CJ. 2006. Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle. Journal Animal Science. 84 (Suppl 1):E14-E24. DOI: 10.2527/2006.8413_supplE14x

  24. JONES GA, McAllister TA, Muir AD, Cheng KJ. 1994. Effects of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) condensed tannins on growth and proteolysis by four strains of ruminal bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 60:1374-1378. DOI: 0099-2240/94

  25. KARDEL M, Taube F, Schultz H, Gierus M. 2013. Different approaches to evaluate tannin content and structure of selected plants extracts - review and new aspects. Journal of Applied Botany and Food Quality. 86:154-166. DOI: 10.5073/JABFQ.2013.086.021

  26. KEBREAB EJ, Dijkstra A, Bannink, France J. 2009. Recent advances in modeling nutrient utilization in ruminants. Journal Animal Science. 87(Suppl. 1), E111-E122. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1313

  27. KRUEGER WK, Gutierrez-Bañuelos H, Carstens GE, Min BR, Pinchak WE, Gomez RR, Anderson RC, Krueger NA, Forbes TDA. 2010. Effects of dietary tannin source on performance, feed efficiency, ruminal fermentation, and carcass and non-carcass traits in steers fed a high-grain diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 159:1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2010.05.003

  28. LASCANO C, Cárdenas E. 2010. Alternatives for methane emission mitigation in livestock systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 39:175-182. DOI: 10.1590/S1516- 35982010001300020

  29. MAKKAR HPS. 2003. Effects and fate of tannins in ruminant animals, adaptation to tannins, and strategies to overcome detrimental effects of feeding tannin-rich feeds. Small Ruminant Research. 49:241-256. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1

  30. MILLER DN, Berry ED, Wells JE, Ferrell CL, Archibeque SL, Freetly HC. 2006. Influence of genotype and diet on steer performance, manure odor, and carriage of pathogenic and other fecal bacteria. III. Odorous compound production. Journal Animal Science. 84:2533- 2545. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2005-748

  31. MILLER DN, Varel VH. 2001. In vitro study of the biochemical origin and production limits of odorous compounds in cattle feedlots. Journal Animal Science. 79:2949-2956. DOI: 10.2527/2001.79122949x

  32. NASEM. The National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. National Academy Press. 8th ed. Washington, DC, USA.

  33. OWENS FN, Zinn RA, Kim YK. 1986. Limits to starch digestion in the ruminants small intestine. Journal Animal Science. 63:1634-1648. DOI: 10.2527/jas.1986.6351634x

  34. SHABTAY A, Ravid U, Brosh A, Baybikov R, Eitam H, Laor Y. 2009. Dynamics of offensive gas-phase odorants in fresh and aged feces throughout the development of beef cattle. Journal Animal Science. 87:1835-1848. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1357

  35. VAREL VH, Miller DN. 2000. Plant-derived oils reduce pathogens and gaseous emissions from stored cattle waste. American Society for Microbiology. 3:1366-1370. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.3.1366-1370.2001

  36. VÁZQUEZ AA, Álvarez E, López JA, Wall A, De la rosa LA. 2012. Taninos hidrolizables y condensados: naturaleza química, ventajas y desventajas de su consumo. Tecnociencia Chihuahua. 6:84-93. http://tecnociencia.uach.mx/numeros/v6n2/data/Taninos_hidrolizables_y_condensados_ naturaleza_quimica_ventajas_y_desventajas_de_su_consumo.pdf

  37. VÉLEZ-TERRANOVA M, Campos-Gaona R, Sánchez-Guerrero H. 2014. Uso de metabolitos secundarios de las plantas para reducir la metanogénesis ruminal. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 17:489-499. E-ISSN: 1870-0462




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

AbanicoVet. 2019;9