medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Mental

ISSN 0185-3325 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Salud Mental 2019; 42 (6)

Psychometric Properties of the Self-efficacy Scale for a Healthy Diet in Individuals with Obesity

Cortés-Ramírez JC, Gómez-Peresmitré G, Platas ARS, Villalobos-Gallegos L, Marín-Navarrete R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 37
Page: 289-296
PDF size: 261.24 Kb.


Key words:

Self-efficacy, behavior modification, obesity, healthy diet.

ABSTRACT

Background. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in his or her capacity to execute certain behaviors and determines changes in the lifestyle of persons with chronic diseases such as obesity. There is currently no instrument with optimal psychometric properties measuring self-efficacy for a healthy diet. HAPA is a theoretical framework that can describe, explain, and predict health behavior changes and its relationship with self-efficacy, and it that is useful for the development of interventions, particularly in the area of healthy diets. Objective. The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure self-efficacy for a healthy diet in Mexican population with obesity and the evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Self-Efficacy Scale for a Healthy Diet (SSHD). Method. The sample included 202 participants receiving care in public obesity clinics. The SSHD applied is a Likert-type scale developed from the Health Action Process Approach containing 45 items. Omega coefficient and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were estimated to evaluate the psychometric properties. Results. The scale has good measures of goodness of fit χ2 = 66.49; p ‹ .001; χ2 SB/gl = 41; CFIS = .955; NFI = .893; RMSEAS = .056 (95% CI [.029, .079]) and total scale reliability of ω = .896 (CI 95% [.876, .915]). Discussion and conclusion. The SSHD is a reliable, valid instrument for measuring the three types of self-efficacies proposed in HAPA in people with obesity who require changes to adhere to a healthier diet.


REFERENCES

  1. Aedo, Á., & Ávila, H. (2009). Nuevo cuestionario para evaluar la autoeficacia hacia la actividad física en niños. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica, 26(4), 324-329. Retrieved from https://www.scielosp.org/article/ssm/content/ raw/?resource_ssm_path=/media/assets/rpsp/v26n4/v26n4a06.pdf

  2. Anderson, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Wojcik, J. R. (2000). Social-cognitive determinants of nutrition behavior among supermarket food shoppers: A structural equation analysis. Health Psychology, 19(5), 479-486. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.5.479

  3. Anderson, E. S., Winett, R. A., & Wojcik, J. R. (2007). Self-regulation, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and social support: Social cognitive theory and nutrition behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 34(3), 304-312. doi: 10.1007/ BF02874555

  4. Anderson, J. W., Konz, E. C., Frederich, R. C., & Wood, C. L. (2001). Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 74(5), 579-584. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/74.5.579 Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122

  5. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

  6. Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

  7. Bonsaksen, T., Fagermoen, M. S., & Lerdal, A. (2014). Trajectories of self-efficacy in persons with chronic illness: An explorative longitudinal study. Psychology & Health, 29(3), 350-364. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.856432 Bonsaksen, T., Lerdal, A., & Fagermoen, M. S. (2012). Factors associated with selfefficacy in persons with chronic illness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 53(4), 333-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00959.x

  8. Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd. ed). New York: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.

  9. Delahanty, L. M., Peyrot, M., Shrader, P. J., Williamson, D. A., Meigs, J. B., & Nathan, D. M. (2013). Pretreatment, psychological, and behavioral predictors of weight outcomes among lifestyle intervention participants in the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP). Diabetes Care, 36(1), 34-40. doi: 10.2337/dc12- 0733

  10. Flores León, A., González-Celis Rangel, A. L., & Valencia Ortíz, A. (2010). Validación del instrumento de autoeficacia para realizar conductas saludables en niños Mexicanos sanos. Psicología y Salud, 20(1), 23-30. doi: 10.25009/pys. v20i1.613. Retrieved from http://psicologiaysalud.uv.mx/index.php/psicysalud/ article/view/613

  11. Gutiérrez-Doña, B., Lippke, S., Renner, B., Kwon, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2009). Self‐efficacy and planning predict dietary behaviors in Costa Rican and South Korean women: Two moderated mediation analyses. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(1), 91-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1758- 0854.2009.01004.x

  12. Hattar, A., Pal, S., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Predicting physical activity-related outcomes in overweight and obese adults: A health action process approach. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 8(1), 127-151. doi: 10.1111/ aphw.12065

  13. Hromi-Fiedler, A., Chapman, D., Segura-Pérez, S., Damio, G., Clark, P., Martinez, J., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to improve fruit and vegetable intake among WIC-eligible pregnant Latinas: An application of the health action process approach framework. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), 468-477. doi: 10.1016/J.JNEB.2016.04.398

  14. Hromi-Fiedler, A., Chapman, D., Segura-Pérez, S., Damio, G., Clark, P., Martinez, J., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2016). Barriers and facilitators to improve fruit and vegetable intake among WIC-eligible pregnant Latinas: An application of the health action process approach framework. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 48(7), 468-477. doi: 10.1016/J.JNEB.2016.04.398

  15. Johnstone, C. J. Bottsford-Miller, N. A., & Thompson. S. J. (2006). Using the think aloud method (cognitive labs) to evaluate test design for students with disabilities and english language learners. Technical report 44. National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from https://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED495909

  16. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Second). New York: Guilford Press.

  17. Kreausukon, P., Gellert, P., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2012). Planning and selfefficacy can increase fruit and vegetable consumption: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35(4), 443-451. doi: 10.1007/s10865- 011-9373-1

  18. Lloret-Segura, S., Ferreres-Traver, A., Hernández-Baeza, A., & Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. doi: 10.6018/ analesps.30.3.199361

  19. Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez‐Doña, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005a). General self‐efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 80-89. doi: 10.1080/00207590444000041

  20. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005b). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439- 457. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457

  21. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84-99. doi: 10.1037/1082- 989X.4.1.84

  22. Motl, R. W., Dishman, R. K., Saunders, R. P., Dowda, M., Felton, G., Ward, D. S., & Pate, R. R. (2002). Examining social-cognitive determinants of intention and physical activity among black and white adolescent girls using structural equation modeling. Health Psychology, 21(5), 459-467. doi: 10.1037/0278- 6133.21.5.459. PMID: 12211513

  23. Organización Mundial de la Salud. (2013). OMS | Dieta. Retrieved September 12, 2019, from https://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/diet/es/

  24. Parschau, L., Fleig, L., Koring, M., Lange, D., Knoll, N., Schwarzer, R., & Lippke, S. (2013). Positive experience, self-efficacy, and action control predict physical activity changes: A moderated mediation analysis. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18(2), 395-406. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02099.x

  25. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. Routledge.

  26. Renner, B., Kwon, S., Yang, B.-H., Paik, K.-C., Kim, S. H., Roh, S., ... Schwarzer, R. (2008). Social-cognitive predictors of dietary behaviors in South Korean men and women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 4-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03003068

  27. Ritter, P. L., & Lorig, K. (2014). The English and Spanish self-efficacy to manage chronic disease scale measures were validated using multiple studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(11), 1265-1273. doi: 10.1016/j. jclinepi.2014.06.009

  28. Saldaña, R. M. E. G., Peresmitré, G. G., Meraz, M. G., & del Castillo Arreola, A. (2011). Análisis factorial confirmatorio del inventario de autoeficacia percibida para control de peso en población mexicana. Psicología Iberoamericana, 19(2), 78-88. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/ comocitar.oa?id=133921440009

  29. Scholz, U., Nagy, G., Göhner, W., Luszczynska, A., & Kliegel, M. (2009). Changes in self-regulatory cognitions as predictors of changes in smoking and nutrition behaviour. Psychology & Health, 24(5), 545-561. doi: 10.1080/08870440801902519

  30. Scholz, U., Sniehotta, F. F., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Predicting physical exercise in cardiac rehabilitation: The role of phase-specific self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27(2), 135-151. doi: 10.1123/jsep.27.2.135 . Schwarzer, R. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x

  31. Schwarzer, R., & Gutiérrez-Doña, B. (2009). Modelando el cambio en el comportamiento de salud: Cómo predecir y modifcar la adopción y el mantenimiento de comportamientos de salud. Revista Costarricense de Psicología, 28(41-42), 11-39. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/ pdf/4767/476748706011.pdf

  32. Schwarzer, R., & Renner, B. (2005). Health-specific self-efficacy scales. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/healself.pdf

  33. Schwarzer, R., Schüz, B., Ziegelmann, J. P., Lippke, S., Luszczynska, A., & Scholz, U. (2007). Adoption and maintenance of four health behaviors: Theory-guided longitudinal studies on dental flossing, seat belt use, dietary behavior, and physical activity. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 33(2), 156-166. doi: 10.1007/ BF02879897

  34. Skjong, R., & Wentworth, B. (2000). Expert judgement and risk perception. Retrieved from http://research.dnv.com/skj/Papers/SkjWen.pdf

  35. Zhang, C., Zheng, X., Huang, H., Su, C., Zhao, H., Yang, H., ... Pan, X. (2018). A study on the applicability of the health action process approach to the dietary behavior of university students in Shanxi, China. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 50(4), 388-395. doi: 10.1016/J.JNEB.2017.09.024

  36. Zhou, G., Gan, Y., Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2013). Proactive coping moderates the dietary intention–planning–behavior path. Appetite, 70, 127-133. doi: 10.1016/J.APPET.2013.06.097

  37. Zucker, S., Sassman, C., & Case, B. J. (2004). Cognitive Labs. Retrieved from http:// images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/tmrs_rg/CognitiveLabs.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Salud Mental. 2019;42