medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Ciencias Médicas de Pinar del Río

ISSN 1561-3194 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Ciencias Médicas 2019; 23 (5)

Advantages of Nyhus versus Lichtenstein technique for surgical treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia

Alfonso VJM, Correa ML, Domínguez RDL, Delgado FJC, Cabrera RCA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 664-670
PDF size: 189.87 Kb.


Key words:

hernia inguinal, surgical procedures operative, surgery department hospital, epidemiology, risk factors.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Lichtenstein's and Nyhus techniques represent safe hernioplasties; Nyhus is a procedure not yet reported as the choice for bilateral inguinal hernia.
Objective: to describe the advantages of Lichtenstein technique comparing Nyhus technique for the management of inguinal hernia as the treatment of choice in patients suffering from bilateral inguinal hernia.
Methods: an observational, analytical, and cross-sectional study of control cases was conducted at Abel Santamaría Cuadrado General Teaching Hospital during 2014-2017 in Pinar del Río, Cuba. The sample consisted of 62 cases, in two groups that included 31 patients; Group A: operated by Nyhus technique. Group B: operated in two stages by Lichtenstein technique. Descriptive and inferential statistical tools were applied.
Results: in group A, the standard surgical time was 42 minutes, group B was over 60, the chi-square statistician showed the non-homogeneity between the frequencies being statistically significant the difference when observing the value of p=0,00020. The hospitalization time in A averaged 26 hours, in group B predominated more than 48 hours, the statistician chi-square showed the non-homogeneity between the frequencies being statistically significant the difference when observing the value of p=0.00000059. The ratio of complications of group A and B was 1.57. Patients belonging to Group A had no recurrence or inguinodynia symptoms, patients from Group B presented 3 inguinodynia episodes.
Conclusions: Nyhus technique is the preferred choice for surgical treatment of bilateral inguinal hernia.


REFERENCES

  1. Casamayor Callejas E, Legrá Legrá J, Danger Durán M, Pardo Olivares E. Características clínicas y epidemiológicas en pacientes operados de hernias inguinales. MEDISAN [Internet]. 2018 Jun [citado 18/02/2019]; 22(6): [aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1029- 30192018000600003&lng=es.Pérez

  2. Pérez Espinoza E. PERFIL EPIDEMIOLÓGICO DE HERNIAS ABDOMINALES EN PACIENTES DEL HOSPITAL ABEL GILBERT [Internet]. Guayaquil; 2018 [citado 26/12/2018]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ug.edu.ec/bitstream/redug/31400/1/PEREZ%20ESPINOZA%20EDUARDO %20BELISARIO.pdf

  3. Dávila Dorta D. La «invasividad» de las técnicas quirúrgicas en el tratamiento de las hernias de la región inguinal. Revista Hispanoamericana de Hernia. [Internet]. 2016 [citado 18/02/2019]; 4(3): [aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2255267716300159

  4. Granda Ana C, Correa-Tineo Santos, Quispe Antonio M. Herniorrafía con la técnica de Lichtenstein versus Nyhus en el manejo de las hernias inguinales y sus complicaciones postoperatorias en un hospital del Perú. Acta méd. Peru [Internet]. 2016 Jul [citado 27/12/2018]; 33(3): [aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1728- 59172016000300007&lng=es.

  5. Cachi Jurado RJ. BENEFICIOS DE LA TÉCNICA NYHUS FRENTE A LA LICHTENSTEIN EN HERNIAS INGUINALES HOSPITAL NACIONAL ARZOBISPO LOAYZA-2016. [Tesis]. Lima-Perú; 2017. Disponible en: http://www.repositorioacademico.usmp.edu.pe/bitstream/usmp/3392/3/cachi_jrj.pdf

  6. Correa Martínez L, Domínguez Rodríguez DL. Epidemiología de pacientes afectos de hernia inguinal bilateral. Rev Ciencias Médicas [Internet]. 2018 Jun [citado 27/12/2018]; 22(3): [aprox. 7p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1561-31942018000300009&lng=es

  7. Porro Novo N. Homeostasis. EN: Pardo Gómez G, García Gutiérrez. Temas de Cirugía Tomo I. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2010. p 1-8

  8. Matzke G, Espil G, Dos Ramos Alferes JP, Larrañaga N, Oyarzún A, Kozima S. Un recorrido por la pared abdominal: evaluación de las hernias por tomografía computada multidetector. Revista Argentina de Radiología. [Internet]. 2017 Mar [citado 27/12/2018]; 81(1): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048761916300278

  9. Caraballoso García VJ, Casanova Pérez PA, Galloso Cueto GL, Santana González-Chávez A, Orea Cordero I, Caraballoso García L. Resultados del tratamiento quirúrgico de los pacientes operados de hernia inguinocrural. Rev. Med. Electrón. [Internet]. 2016 Ago [citado 18/02/2019]; 38(4): [aprox. 11p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1684-18242016000400006&lng=es.

  10. Destek S, Onur Gul V. Comparison of Lichtenstein Repair and Mesh Plug Repair Methods in The Treatment of Indirect Inguinal Hernia. Cureus. [Internet]. 2018 Jul [citado 18/02/2019]; 10(7). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128592/

  11. Molina Fernández EJ, de la Paz Mora O, Arias Larios L, García Sierra JC, Tamayo Gandol Y. Infecciones en cirugía herniaria bioprotésica. Rev Cubana Cir [Internet]. 2014 Dic [citado 18/02/2019]; 53(4): [aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932014000400011&lng=es.

  12. Rodríguez Ginarte T, Vidal Machado D. Anestesia epidural y anestesia espinal en pacientes cesareadas. Multimed [Internet]. 2013 Dic [citado 18/02/2019]; 17(2): [aprox. 13p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revmultimed.sld.cu/index.php/mtm/article/view/293/391




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Ciencias Médicas. 2019;23