medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Salud Pública de México

Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2020; 62 (2)

Experimental infection and vector competence of Zika virus in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes from Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico

Sánchez-Casiano N, Cime-Castillo J, Ovilla-Muñoz M, Ramírez-Arroyo J, González-Acosta C, Moreno-García M, Correa-Morales F, Pando-Robles V
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 27
Page: 203-210
PDF size: 553.24 Kb.


Key words:

vector competence, Zika virus, Aedes aegypti, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To gain a better understanding of the Zika virus (ZIKV) vector transmission in Mexico, we determined the vector competence of a local population of Ae. aegypti (Aca- pulco, Guerrero) for a strain of ZIKV isolated from a Mexican febrile patient. Materials and methods. Eggs were hatched and larvae were reared under controlled conditions. After five days post-emergence, female mosquitoes were fed an infectious blood-meal containing ZIKV. Mosquitoes were analyzed at 4, 7 and 14-day post-infection (dpi). Infection (gut), dissemination (wings, legs and heads) and potential transmission (salivary glands) were assessed by RT-qPCR. The Rockefeller Ae. aegypti strain was used as ZIKV infection control. Results. ZIKV infection, dissemination, and potential transmission rates were 96.2, 96.1 and 93.2%, respectively. Conclusions. Ae. aegypti (F1) from Acapulco were very susceptible to ZIKV infection, and showed similar vector competence to that of the susceptible Rockefeller strain. To our knowledge, this is the first report of vector competence for ZIKV performed in a Mexican laboratory.


REFERENCES

  1. Dick GWA, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika Virus (I) Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952;46(5):509-20. https://doi. org/10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4

  2. Duffy M.R, Chen T-H, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:2536-43. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0805715

  3. Cao-Lormeau VM, Roche C, Teissier A, Robin E, Berry AL, Mallet HP et al. Zika Virus, French Polynesia, South Pacific, 2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(6):5-6. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2006.140138

  4. Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1885-86. https://doi.org/10.32301/ eid2110.150847

  5. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Enfermedad por el virus de Zika [Internet]. Geneva: WHO, 2018, 2017 [cited July 2, 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/zika/es/

  6. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, Popovic M, Poljsak-Prijatelj M, Mraz J, et al. Zika Virus Associated with Microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(10):951-8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1600651

  7. Krauer F, Riesen M, Reveiz L, Oladapo OT, Martínez-Vega R, Porgo TV, et al. Zika virus infection as a cause of congenital brain abnormalities and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Systematic Review. PLOS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002203. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002203

  8. Lazear H, Diamond M. Zika virus: new clinical syndromes and its emergence in the Western Hemisphere. J Virol. 2016;90(10):4864-75. https:// doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00252-16

  9. Epelboin Y, Talaga S, Epelboin L, Dusfour I. Zika virus: An updated review of competent or naturally infected mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(11)e0005933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005933

  10. Elizondo-Quiroga D, Medina-Sánchez A, Sánchez-González JM, Eckert KA, Villalobos-Sánchez E, Navarro-Zuñiga AR, et al. Zika virus in salivary glands of five different species of wild-caught mosquitoes from Mexico. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):809. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18682-3

  11. Kramer LD, Ciota AT. Dissecting vectorial capacity for mosquitoborne viruses. Curr Opin Virol. 2015;15:112-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. coviro.2015.10.003

  12. Franz AWE, Kantor AM, Passarelli AL, Clem RJ. Tissue barriers to arbovirus infection in mosquitoes. Viruses. 2015;7(7):3741-67. https://doi. org/10.3390/v7072795

  13. Souza-Neto JA, Powell JR, Bonizzoni M. Aedes aegypti vector competence studies: A review. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;67:191-209. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.meegid.2018.11.009

  14. Díaz-Quiñonez JA, López-Martínez I, Torres-Longoria B, VázquezPichardo M, Cruz-Ramírez E, Ramírez-González JE, et al. Evidence of the presence of the Zika virus in Mexico since early 2015. Virus Genes. 2016;52(6):855-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-016-1384-0

  15. Secretaría de Salud. Casos confirmados de enfermedad por virus del Zika, Semana Epidemiológica 25 del 2019 [Internet]. Mexico City: SS, 2019. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/casos-confirmados-de-infeccion-por-virus-zika-2019

  16. Secretaría de Salud. Casos confirmados de Síndrome Congénito asociado a Zika, México 2016 - 2018 [Internet]. Mexico City: SS, 2018. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/desglose-de-casosde-sindrome-congenito-asociado-a-zika

  17. Secretaría de Salud. Casos confirmados de Sindrome de Guillán-Barré asociado a Zika en México [Internet]. Mexico City: 2018. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/salud/documentos/zika-y-sindrome-guillain-barre

  18. Roundy CM, Azar SR, Rossi SL, Huang JH, Leal G, Yun R, et al. Variation in Aedes aegypti mosquito competence for zika virus transmission. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(4):625-32. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2304.161484

  19. Garcia-Luna SM, Weger-Lucarelli J, Rückert C, Murrieta Ra, Young MC, Byas AD, et al. Variation in competence for ZIKV transmission by Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Mexico. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(7):e0006599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006599

  20. Waggoner JJ, Gresh L, Mohamed-Hadley A, Ballesteros G, Davila MJ, Tellez Y, et al. Single-reaction multiplex reverse transcription PCR for detection of zika, Chikungunya, and dengue viruses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(7):1295-7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.160326

  21. Chouin-Carneiro T, Vega-Rua A, Vazeille M, Yebakima A, Girod R, Goindin D, et al. Differential susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(3):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004543

  22. Costa-Da-Silva AL, Ioshino RS, De Araújo HRC, Kojin BB, Zanotto PMA, Leal-Oliveira DB, et al. Laboratory strains of Aedes aegypti are competent to Brazilian Zika virus. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):1-13. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171951

  23. Fontaine A, Jiolle D, Moltini-conclois I, Lequime S. Excretion of dengue virus RNA by Aedes aegypti allows non- destructive monitoring of viral dissemination in individual mosquitoes. Nat Publ Gr. 2016;6:1-10. https:// doi.org/10.1038/srep24885

  24. Raquin V, Lambrechts L. Dengue virus replicates and accumulates in Aedes aegypti salivary glands. Virology. 2017;507:75-81. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.virol.2017.04.009

  25. Li MZI, Wong PSJ, Ng LC, Tan CH. Oral susceptibility of Singapore Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (Linnaeus) to Zika Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(8):e1792. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001792

  26. Diagne CT, Diallo D, Faye O, Ba Y, Faye O, Weaver SC, et al. Potential of selected Senegalese Aedes spp. mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit Zika virus. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):492. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12879-015-1231-2

  27. Silva Júnior JVJ, Rocha-Lopes TR, de Oliveira-Filho EF, dos Santos-Oliveira RA, Vega Gonzales-Gil LH. Perspectives on the Zika outbreak: herd immunity, antibodydependent enhancement and vaccine. 2017;59:e21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-9946201759021




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

salud publica mex. 2020;62