medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Clínica de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2020; 10 (1)

Red de orientación atencional, enganche y desenganche en el Trastorno de Ansiedad Social

Radulovich MM, González SM, Monge OJM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 5-14
PDF size: 1203.07 Kb.


Key words:

Social Anxiety, attentional bias, disengage attention, attention network.

ABSTRACT

Social anxiety is one of the most common anxiety disorders. Its essence lies in a fear disproportionate to public scrutiny, for fear that it leads to humiliation or shame. Because of the social nature of social anxiety, there is a constant exposure of the person to his phobia, however, this does not lead to improvement of symptoms. This particular characteristic of social anxiety disorder guided the studies towards attentional processes in terms of information processing, in order to elucidate that throughout the continuous exposure there is no attenuation of the symptomatology. Studies have repeatedly shown that when attention networks are altered, they propitiate and maintain high levels of social anxiety, due to the way in which information is processed. The following systematic review aims to clarify the particularities of attentional involvement in social anxiety. This was done with studies of the last three years that focus on the coupling and disengagement processes specifically within the attention guidance network. Most of these conclude that attentional engagement is the process that works in a problematic way in social anxiety disorder. Other studies do not obtain the same results, so the importance of considering other variables when evaluating the attention-oriented network is debated in order to elucidate whether there are other factors that influence the alteration of attention which in turn are responsible for that social anxiety disorder persists.


REFERENCES

  1. Stein M B Stein D J. Social anxiety disorder. The Lancet, 2008; 371(9618): 1115-1125.

  2. Lampe L Slade T Issakidis C. Andrews G. Social phobia in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being (NSMHWB). Psychological Medicine, 2003; 33(4): 637-646.

  3. Hirsch C R. Clark D M. Information-processing bias in social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 2004; 24(7): 99-825.

  4. Morrison A S Heimberg R G. Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2013; 9: 249-274.

  5. Petersen S E Posner M I. The Attention System of the Human Brain: 20 Years After. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 2012; 35(1): 73-89.

  6. Taylor C T Cross K Amir N. Attentional Control Moderates the Relationship between Social Anxiety Symptoms and Attentional Disengagement from Threatening Information. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 2016; 50: 68-76.

  7. Chen N Clarke P MacLeod C Hickie I B Guastella, A J. Aberrant Gaze Patterns in Social Anxiety Disorder: An Eye Movement Assessment during Public Speaking. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 2016; 7(1): 1-17.

  8. Rudaizky D Basanovic J MacLeod C. Biased attentional engagement with, and disengagement from, negative information: independent cognitive pathways to anxiety vulnerability? Cognition & Emotion, 2014; 28(2): 245-259.

  9. Boal H L Christensen B K Goodhew S C. Social anxiety and attentional biases: A top-down contribution? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 2018; 80(1): 42-53. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414- 017-1415-5

  10. Grafton B Macleod C. Engaging with the wrong people: The basis of selective attention to negative faces in social anxiety. Clinical Psychological Science, 2016; 4(5): 793-804.

  11. Liang C W Tsai J L Hsu W Y. Sustained visual attention for competing emotional stimuli in social anxiety: An eye tracking study. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 2017; 54: 178- 185.

  12. Heeren A Maurage P Philippot P. Revisiting attentional processing of non-emotional cues in social anxiety: A specific impairment for the orienting network of attention. Psychiatry Research, 2015; 228(1): 136-142.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Clin Esc Med. 2020;10