medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 06

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2020; 88 (06)

Renal length and creatinine clearance in pregnant patients with chronic kidney disease

Vázquez-Rodríguez JG, García-Bello JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 372-379
PDF size: 388.06 Kb.


Key words:

Renal length, Creatinine, Pregnant Patients, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diet, Body Surface Area, Left Kidney, Second Trimester, First Trimester, Left Kidney.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To measure renal length by ultrasound and creatinine clearance to assess its correlation in pregnant patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional, analytical and retrospective study in pregnant patients with CKD whose right, left and total renal length was measured by ultrasound and the creatinine clearance calculated with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation to evaluate its correlation. as a group and by gestational trimesters. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA test and Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) were used with the SPSS version 20 statistical program. The p ‹ 0.05 and r › 0.1 value was considered significant, respectively.
Results: 50 patients were studied. The right renal length was 75.52 ± 16.14 mm, left 84.46 ± 16.51 mm and total 159.96 ± 28.59 mm. The mean creatinine clearance was 34.17 ± 25.63 mL/min/1.73 m2 body surface area. The correlation was positive for the left renal length vs creatinine clearance (r = 0.362) and total renal length vs creatinine clearance (r = 0.346) with more evidence in second trimester patients. The first trimes- ter patients were older (p = 0.004), smaller kidneys (p = 0.008), reduced creatinine clearance (p = 0.001) and higher frequency of terminal chronic kidney disease (18%).
Conclusions: An increase in left kidney length, total kidney length and ACr was found, whose correlation was positive. The changes were evident in second trimester pregnant patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Moëll H. Size of normal kidneys. Acta Radiol. 1956; 46: 640- 45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3109/00016 925609171457?needAccess=tre. (Consulta: febrero 2020)

  2. Fernandes MMR, et al. Normal renal dimensions in a specific population. Int Braz J Urol. 2002; 28: 510-15. Dirección URL: file:///C:/Users/LENOVO/Downloads/ Fernandes_ing_510_515.pdf.

  3. Oyuela-Carrasco J, et al. Longitud renal por ultrasonografía en población mexicana adulta. Nefrología. 2009; 29: 30-34. file:///C:/Users/LENOVO/Downloads/ X0211699509005080.pdf. (Consulta: febrero 2020)

  4. Asmaa SA, Rafael FH. Anatomical and physiological changes during pregnancy. WJPR. 2019; 8: 157-67. https://wjpr.net/ admin/assets/article_issue/1553943117.pdf.

  5. Ramin SM, et al. Chronic renal disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1531-39. doi. 10.1097/01. AOG.0000246790.84218.44

  6. Ablett MJ, et al. How reliable are ultrasound measurements of renal length in adults? Br J Radiol. 1995; 68: 1087-89. doi. 10.1259/0007-1285-68-814-1087

  7. Emamian SA, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variations in sonographic measurements of kidney size in adult volunteers. A comparison of linear measurements and volumetric estimates. Acta Radiol 1995; 36: 399-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/028418519503600414

  8. Adibi A, et al. Do kidney sizes in ultrasonography correlate to glomerular filtration rate in healthy children? Australasians Radiology 2007; 51: 555-59.:https://doi. org/10.1177/028418519503600414

  9. Fried JG, Morgan MA. Renal imaging: core curriculum. AJKD 2019; 73 (4): 552-65. https://www.ajkd.org/article/ S0272-6386(19)30029-0/pdf.

  10. Miletic D, et al. Sonographic measurement of absolute and relative renal length in adults. J Clin Ultrasound. 1998; 26: 185-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0096(199805)26:4<185::AID-JCU1>3.0.CO;2-9

  11. Gracia S, et al. Recomendaciones sobre la utilización de ecuaciones para la estimación del filtrado glomerular en adultos. Nefrologia. 2006; 26: 658-65. http://www. seqc.es/download/revista/118/361/718168/1024/cms/ QC_2006_423_430.pdf/.

  12. Levey AS, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999; 130 (6): 461-70. http:// dickyricky.com/Medicine/Papers/1999_03%20Ann%20 Intern%20Med%20Modification%20of%20Diet%20in%20 Renal%20Disease%20(MDRD)%20Study.pdf

  13. Peral-Aguirregoitia J, et al. Estimación de la tasa de filtración glomerular para el ajuste posológico de los fármacos. Reina la confusión. Nefrologia 2012; 32: 115-17. doi:10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2011.Dec.11235




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2020;88