medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2020, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2020; 62 (4)

Response of Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) to transfluthrin and linalool impregnated in different of fabric types

Paiz-Moscoso KE, Fernández-Salas I, Grieco JP, Achee NL, Torres-Estrada JL

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 417-423
PDF size: 296.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. Evaluate the effect of spatial repellency against Ae. aegypti of two chemical compounds impregnated in different types of fabrics. Materials and methods. The study was carried out in the year 2015-2016 in the Centro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública, del Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. The high-throughput screening system was used to evaluate the response of Ae. aegypti to transfluthrin and linalool, impregnated individually at different concentrations in poplin, cotton and polyester. The effect of their mixtures was also determined, washing on residuality and percentage of protection. Results. The highest spatial repellency response was for 0.1% linalool-cotton treatment (RE = 70 ± 5.77%). The mixture of 0.1% linalool and 0.001% transfluthrin presented a similar spatial repellence percentage for the three types of fabric. The transfluthrin-poplin treatment 0.001% maintained a residual of five days. 0.1% linalool produced a 62.50% protection in the presence of an attraction stimulus. Conclusion. It is suggested the impregnation of 0.1% linalool in clothing as a protection measure for Ae. aegypti.


REFERENCES

  1. Gubler DJ. Resurgent vector-borne diseases as a global health problem. Emer infect dis. 1998;4(3):442. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0403.980326

  2. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496:504-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature1206010.1038/nature12060

  3. Brady OJ, Gething PW, Bhatt S, Messina JP, Brownstein JS, Hoen AG, et al. Refining the global spatial limits of dengue virus transmission by evidence-based consensus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6:e1760. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001760

  4. Sistema Nacional de Vigilancia de Epidemiológica. Información publicada en la semana epidemiológica 52. México: Secretaría de Salud, 2017 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/salud/acciones-yprogramas/ historico-boletin-epidemiologico

  5. Subsecretaría de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud. Centro Nacional de Programas Preventivos y Control de Enfermedades. Declaratoria de emergencia epidemiológica EE-2 -2014. México: Secretaría de Salud, 2014 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.cenaprece. salud.gob.mx/programas/interior/emergencias/descargas/pdf/Declaratoria_ Emergencia_Chiapas_Chikungunya.pdf

  6. Staples JE, Dziuban EJ, Fischer M, Cragan DJ, Rasmussen SA, Cannon MJ, et al. Interim guidelines for the evaluation and testing of infants with possible congenital Zika virus infection. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:63-7. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e3

  7. Oehler E, Watrin L, Larre P, Leparc-Goffart I, Lastere S, Valour F, Ghawche F. Zika virus infection complicated by Guillain-Barre syndrome--case report, French Polynesia, December 2013. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(9):20720. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.9.20720

  8. World Health Organization. Dengue: Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control. Technical report. Ginebra: WHO, TDR, 2009. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/ dengue-diagnosis.pdf

  9. Wilder-Smith A, Renhorn KE, Tissera H, Bakar SA, Alphey L, Kittayapong P, et al. DengueTools: innovative tools and strategies for the surveillance and control of dengue. Glob health action. 2012;5:17273. https://doi. org/10.3402/gha.v5i0.17273

  10. Barnard DR. Repellents and toxicants for personal protection: a WHO Position Paper. Ginebra: WHO, 2000 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/66666/ WHO_CDS_WHOPES_GCDPP_2000.5.pdf;jsessionid=A9417728C7819 767F3884338E137667A?sequence=1

  11. Leal WS. The enigmatic reception of DEET- the gold standard of insect repellents. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2014;6:93-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cois.2014.10.007

  12. World Health Organization. World Malaria Report. Ginebra: WHO, 2011 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/ malaria/world_malaria_report_2011/en/

  13. Kroeger A, Lenhart A, Ochoa M, Villegas E, Levy M, Alexander N, et al. Effective control of dengue vectors with curtains and water container covers treated with insecticide in Mexico and Venezuela: cluster randomised trials. Br J Midwifery. 2006;332(7552):124752. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmj.332.7552.1247

  14. Massad E, Amaku M, Coutinho FAB, Kittayapong P, Wilder-Smith A. Theoretical impact of insecticide-impregnated school uniforms on dengue incidence in Thai children. Glob health action. 2013;6:1. https://doi. org/10.3402/gha.v6i0.20473

  15. Grieco JP, Achee NL, Sardelis MR, Chauhan KR, Roberts DR. A novel high-throughput screening system to evaluate the behavioral response of adult mosquitoes to chemicals 1. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2005;21(4):404-11. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2006)21[404:ANH SST]2.0.CO;2

  16. Ogoma SB, Ngonyani H, Simfukwe ET, Mseka A, Moore J, Killeen GF. Spatial repellency of transfluthrin-treated hessian strips against laboratory- reared Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in a semi-field tunnel cage. Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-54

  17. Park BS, Choi WS, Kim J, Kim K, Lee SE. Monoterpenes from thyme (Thymus vulgaris) as potential mosquito repellents. J Am Mosq Contr Assoc. 2005;21:80-3. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756- 971X(2005)21[80:MFTTVA]2.0.CO;2

  18. Govere M, Durrheim DN. Techniques for evaluating repellents. En: Debboun M, Frances SP, Strickman D (eds). Insect Repellents: Principles, Methods and Uses 2007. Boca Raton: CRC press. 2007:147-59.

  19. Müller GC, Junnila A, Butler J, Kravchenko VD, Revay EE, Weiss RW, et al. Efficacy of the botanical repellents geraniol, linalool, and citronella against mosquitoes. J Vect Ecol. 2009;34(1):2-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1948-7134.2009.00002.x

  20. Kawada H, Maekawa Y, Tsuda Y, Takagi M. Laboratory and field evaluation of spatial repellency with metofluthrin-impregnated paper strip against mosquitoes in Lombok Island, Indonesia. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2004;20:292-8. https://hdl.handle.net/10069/16980

  21. Rubio-Palis Y, Guerra LA. Evaluación del poder residual del insecticida deltametrina en telas de mosquiteros. Entomotropica. 2007;18(1):63-8.

  22. Leyva M, Marquetti MC, Tacoronte JE, Scull R, Tiomno O, Mesa A, Montada D. Actividad larvicida de aceites esenciales de plantas contra Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Rev Biomed. 2009;20:5-13 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revbio/ bio-2009/bio091b.pdf

  23. Parke VD, Quddusur-Rahman KH, Walker R. The absorption, distribution and excretion of linalool in ther rat. Department of Biochemistry, University of Surrey. Biochemical Society Transactions. 1974;2:612-8. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0020612

  24. World Health Organization. Safe use of pesticides. Technical report series 813. Ginebra: WHO, 1991 [citado 28 de febrero, 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/pdf/download/eid/1-s2.0- S0273230005800200/first-page-pdf

  25. Pauluhn J. Hazard identification and risk assessment of pyrethroids in the indoor environment. Toxicology Letters 107. Elsevier. 1999:193-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4274(99)00047-8

  26. Zaim M, Aitio A, Nakashima N. Safety of pyrethroid-treated mosquitos net. Med Vet Entomol. 2000;14:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2915.2000.00211.x




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com