medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2020; 30 (1)

How do I rule out the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a patient undergoing elective surgery? Safety recommendations for surgeries performed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence Based Medicine

Morales-Olivera M
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/94375

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/94375
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/94375

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 22-32
PDF size: 268.18 Kb.


Key words:

SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, diagnostic tests, polymerase chain reaction, simple chest tomography, antigen detection, immunological tests, sensitivity and specificity.

ABSTRACT

The diagnosis of the disease by the new coronavirus (SARSCov-2) represents a real challenge in those asymptomatic patients; since, none of the available diagnostic tests reaches has a sensitivity of 100%. As part of the returning to surgical activities, it is essential to perform a preoperative assessment that includes the detection of a probable inadvertent infection with SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the objective of this work is to identify which the most useful and sensitive diagnostic methods are in our setting based on the best available medical evidence prior to any elective surgery. A systematic review was carried out on the main information sites (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, and Ovid) in Spanish and English, with the keywords: diagnosis, diagnostic tests, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, and coronavirus. Subsequently, the basic questions were written and answered based on the best available medical evidence. According to the information, that polymerase chain reaction was find to be the gold standard for the detection of SARS-CoV-2; however, its sensitivity ranges from 60 to 89% with a high possibility of both false positive and negative. Simple chest tomography has reported a sensitivity of up to 98% in some studies and rapid tests for IgG and IgM, as well as the search for antibodies with a sensitivity as low as 34%. In the preoperative protocol, the best way to identify an asymptomatic patient with COVID-19 is performing the polymerase chain reaction together with simple chest tomography.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) technical guidance: laboratory testing for 2019-nCoV in humans. 2020. [Consultado 26 de marzo de 2020] Available in: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technicalguidance/laboratory-guidance

  2. Patel R, Babady E, Theel ES et al. Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 international summit, 23 March 2020: value of diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19. mBio 2020; 11 (2): e00722-20.

  3. Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases. Interim guidance. 19 March 2020. [Consultado 31 de marzo de 2020] Available in: https://www.who.int/publications-detail/laboratory-testing-for-2019-novel-coronavirus-in-suspected-human-cases-20200117

  4. Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LLM, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20 (4): 411-412.

  5. Loeffelholz MJ, Tang YW. Laboratory diagnosis of emerging human coronavirus infections - the state of the art. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9 (1): 747-756.

  6. World Health Organization. Advice on the use of point-of-care immunodiagnostic tests for COVID-19. Scientific brief. 8 April 2020. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/sb-2020-1-poc-immunodiagnostics-2020-04-08-e.pdf?sfvrsn=4c26ac39_2

  7. Pascarella G, Strumia A, Piliego C et al. Covid-19 diagnosis and management: a comprehensive review. J Intern Med 2020. doi: 10.1111/joim.13091

  8. Yan Y, Shin WI, Pang YX et al. The first 75 days of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak: recent advantages, prevention and treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 2323. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072323.

  9. Adhikari SP, Meng S, Wu YJ et al. Epidemiology, causes, clinical manifestation and diagnosis, prevention and control of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) during the early outbreak period: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty 2020; 9 (1): 29.

  10. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao Jianping, Hu Y et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020; 395: 497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(20)30183–5.

  11. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1054-1062.

  12. Li T, Wei C, Li W, Hongwei F, Shi J. Beijing union medical college hospital on “pneumonia of novel coronavirus infection” diagnosis and treatment proposal (V2.0). Med J Peking Union Med Coll Hosp 2020. [Accessed 2 Feb 2020] http://kns.cnki. net/kcms/detail/11.5882.r.20200130.1430.002.html

  13. CDC. 2019 Novel coronavirus, Wuhan, China. 2020. [Accessed 1 Feb 2020] Available in: https://www.cdc.gov/ coronavirus/2019-nCoV/summary.html.

  14. Alhazzani W, Hylander M, Arabi YM et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: Guidelines of management of critically III adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19). Crit Care Med J 2020; 28 (6): 440-469.

  15. Corman VM, Landt O, Kaiser M et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill 2020; 25 (3): 2000045.

  16. Chu DKW, Pan Y, Cheng SMS et al. Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia. Clin Chem 2020; 66: 549-555.

  17. Zhang W, Du RH, Li B et al. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9 (1): 386-389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071.

  18. Sociedad Española de Inmunología. Utilidad de la determinación de anticuerpos anti SARS-CoV-2. Propuesta de implementación como prueba diagnóstica, pronóstica y de desarrollo de inmunidad protectora. 2 abril 2020 [Consultado 5 de abril de 2020].

  19. Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A report of 1014 Cases. Radiology 2020. [online ahead of print]

  20. Fang Y, Zhang H, Xie J et al. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology 2020; 200432.

  21. Hani C, Trieu NH, Saab I et al. COVID-19 pneumonia: A review of typical CT findings and differential diagnosis. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101 (5): 263-268.

  22. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L et al. Time course of lung changes on chest CT during recovery from 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. Radiology 2020; 200370. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200370.

  23. Shi H, Han X, Cao Y, Alwalid O, Zheng C. CT screening for early diagnosis of SARS- CoV-2 infection-authors’ reply. Lancet Infect Dis 2020. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30247-4.

  24. Salehi S, Abedi A, Balakrishnan S, Gholamrezanezhad A. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of imaging findings in 919 Patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23034.

  25. Yuan M, Yin W, Tao Z, Tan W, Hu Y. Association of radiologic findings with mortality of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0230548.

  26. Xie X, Zhong Z, Zhao W, Zheng C, Wang F, Liu J. Chest CT for typical 2019-nCoV pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PC Testing. Radiology 2020; 200343. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343.

  27. Xu X, Yu C, Qu J, Zhang L, Jiang S, Huang D et al. Imaging and clinical features of patients with 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2020; 47: 1275-1280.

  28. Kanne JP, Chest CT findings in 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infections from Wuhan, China: key points for the radiologist. Radiology 2020 [Epub ahead of print].

  29. Feng H, Liu Y, Lv M, Zhong J. A case report of COVID-19 with false negative RT-PCR test: necessity of chest CT. Jpn J Radiol 2020. doi: 10.1007/s11604-020-00967-9.

  30. Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating in China. Cell Host Microbe 2020; 27 (3): 325-328. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001.

  31. Lorusso A, Calistri P, Petrini A, Savini G, Decaro N. Novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic: a veterinary perspective. Vet Ital 2020; 56 (1): 1-6. doi: 10.12834/VetIt.2173.11599.1.

  32. Aviso Epidemiológico. Available in: https://www.gob.mx/cms/ uploads/attachment/file/541794/AE_Enfermedad_COVID-19_SARS-CoV-2_2020.03.17.pdf.

  33. American College of Radiology. ACR recommendations for the use of chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) for suspected COVID-19 infection. 2020. Available in: https://www.acr.org/Advocacy-and-Economics/ACR-Position-Statements/Recommendations-for-Chest-Radiography-and-CT-for-Suspected-COVID19-Infection

  34. Li Y, Xia L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): role of chest CT in diagnosis and management. AJR 2020; 214: 1280-1286.

  35. Winichakoon P, Chaiwarith R, Liwsrisakun C et al. Negative nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab does not rule out COVID-19. J Clin Microbiol 2020.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2020;30