medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Odontológica Mexicana Órgano Oficial de la Facultad de Odontología UNAM

ISSN 1870-199X (Print)
Órgano oficial de la Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odont Mex 2004; 8 (4)

Shear bond strength to enamel using different adhesives and two bracket bases in-vitro comparative study

López FS, Palma CJM, Guerrero IJ, Ballesteros LM, Haroldo Elorza Pérez
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 122-126
PDF size: 204.87 Kb.


Key words:

Shear bond strength, adhesion, adhesive, tangential forces, bracket bases.

ABSTRACT

New dental adhesives are being developed constantly to reduce time, and to simplify the bonding technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate the strength obtained after applying different adhesive methods to the enamel with two types of mechanical interlock bases metal brackets (Gemini [mesh] / Minidinalock [rail]). Forty experimental samples (premolars) were used and divided into two groups of 20. The first was treated with self etching primer (SEP Transbond Plus) and the second with conventional adhesive (Transbond MIP) from 3M UNITEK company. The samples were exposed to tangential forces in the universal Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min in order to determine the force of detachment brackets. After carrying out the statistical analysis one way ANOVA F(4,10) = 4.921, P = 0.006 and the Dunnett test concluded that conventional adhesive Transbond MIP with mesh (control group) and one step adhesive with rail showed statistically significant difference in the shear bond strength obtained to enamel.


REFERENCES

  1. Inagaki A, Chigira H, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Effects of self-etching primers on dentin. Dent Mater 1989; 5: 403-7.

  2. Phillips R. La ciencia de los materiales dentales de Skinner. Novena ed. México: Ed. Interamericana McGraw-Hill; 1993: 22-7, 240-6.

  3. Roulet JF. Adhesion. The silent revolution in dentistry. Germany: Quintessence Books; 2000: 39-41.

  4. Craig R. Materiales de odontología restauradora. 10ª Ed. Madrid: Ed. Harcourt Brace; 1998: 256-60.

  5. Sunna R. An ex vivo investigation into the bond strength of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems. Brit J Ortho 1999; 26: 47-50.

  6. Bishara S, Gordan V, VonWald L, Jakobsen J. Shear bond strength of composite, glass ionomer, and acidic primer adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999; 115: 24-8.

  7. Bishara S, Gordan V, VonWald L, Olson M. Effect of an acidic primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114: 243-7.

  8. Bergeron C, Vargas M, Gelinas P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond strength of self-etching adhesives to enamel. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 442

  9. Rueggeberg F, Fortson W, Mettenburg D. Orthodontic Bracket Retention strength using a self-etching resin primer. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 282.

  10. 10.Elorza H. Estadística para las ciencias sociales y del comportamiento. 2a Ed. México: Oxford University Press, 2000: 445-71.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Odont Mex. 2004;8