medigraphic.com
ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2020; 42 (1)

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: eight-years study in geriatric patients

del Valle LP, Coronel NJA

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page:
PDF size: 173.34 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography technique was introduced in the province of Matanzas in February 2010, for the treatment of the cases with this indication and attending an important group of patients in geriatric age.
Objective: to describe the results of this technique after eight years of use.
Method: a descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out in patients aged more than 65 years, who were attended in the service of Minimal Access Surgery of the Clinical Surgical University Hospital “Comandante Faustino Pérez Hernández”, in the period January 2010-January 2018. The studied population was 698 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for 713 reports of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.
Results: female sex and cannulation of the desired duct predominated; pre-cut was used as complementary technique. Choledocholithiasis was the most frequent diagnosis; the most used therapeutic action was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and pancreatitis was the most commonly found complication. In the studied period, four patients died as a consequence of severe acute cholangitis.
Conclusions: the obtained results are similar to those obtained in populations undergoing the procedure in general, patients´ age-independent. It is a safe procedure in geriatric ages. The endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a tool of a great diagnosis and therapeutic usefulness in our midst, with a morbid-mortality frequency guarantying it.


REFERENCES

  1. Greenberger Norton J, Blumberg RS, Burakoff R. Diagnóstico y tratamiento en Gastroenterologia, Hepatologia y Endoscopia. 7ma ed. USA:Mc. GRAW-HILL Interamericana; 2011 p.377-88.

  2. Ramos Pachón CM, González Cansino JR. La colangiopancreatografía endoscópica retrógrada: 40 años de desarrollo. Investigaciones Medicoquirúrgicas [Internet]. 2012 [citado03/05/2019];1(2): Disponible en: http://www.revcimeq.sld.cu/index.php/imq/article/view/82

  3. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post- ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1):143–49. Citado en PubMed;PMID:25088919.

  4. Inamdar S, Berzin TM, Sejpal DV, et al. Pregnancy is a risk factor for pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a national cohort study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 14:107–114. Citado en PubMed;PMID: 25952311.

  5. Sundaralingam P, Masson P, Bourke MJ. Early precut sphincterotomy does not increase risk during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with difficult biliary access: ameta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 13(1):1722–29. Citado en PubMed;PMID:26144018.

  6. Romero López A, Torices Escalante E, Domínguez Camacho L, et al. Experiencia en la realización de colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica como procedimiento diagnóstico y terapéutico. Análisis de 1 308 casos en 6 años. Endoscopia[Internet]. 2012[citado03/05/2019]; 24(4):149-53. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/esrevista- endoscopia-335-articulo-experiencia-realizacion-colangiopancreatografiaretrograda- endoscopica-X0188989312839941

  7. Choksi NS, Fogel EL, Cote GA et al, The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and the protective effect of rectal indomethacin in cases of attempted but unsuccessful prophylactic pancreatic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc [Internet]. 2015[citado03/05/2019]; 81:150–155. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/esrevista- endoscopia-335-articulo-experiencia-realizacion-colangiopancreatografiaretrograda- endoscopica-X0188989312839941

  8. Mohammad Alizadeh AH, Afzali ES, Behzad C, et al. Is ESR Important for Predicting Post-ERCP Pancreatitis? Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol. 2015; 8:23-7. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 26005364.

  9. Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: general overview. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2015; 25(1):97– 106. Citado en PubMed; PMID:25442961.

  10. Ruiz Torres JF. Propuesta de algoritmo y acreditación para el uso de la Colangiopancreatografia Retrograda Endoscópica en los Centros Hospitalarios. [Tesis]. La Habana: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana; 2013.

  11. Osuna Ramírez I, Reyes Bastidas M, Suárez Peredo L, et al. Colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica en la tercera edad: factores de riesgo y complicaciones. Endoscopía [Internet]. 2013[citado02/03/2019]; 25(1):10-5. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-endoscopia-335-articulocolangiopancreatografia- retrograda-endoscopica-tercera-edad-X0188989313925125

  12. Brizuela Quintanilla RA, Ruiz Torres JF. Tumores de las vías biliares extrahepáticas. En: Paniagua Estévez ME, Piñol Jiménez FN. Gastroenterología y hepatología clínica. La Habana: Ciencias Médicas; 2015. p. 2566

  13. Naranjo Hernández Y, Figueroa Linares M, Cañizares Marín R. Envejecimiento poblacional en Cuba. Gac Méd Espirit [Internet]. 2015 [citado 01/06/2019]; 17(3):223-33. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1608- 89212015000300025&lng=es

  14. Bayarre Vea HD, Álvarez Lauzarique ME, Pérez Piñero JS, et al. Enfoques, evolución y afrontamiento del envejecimiento demográfico en Cuba. Rev Panam Salud Pública. 2018;42:e21. Citado en PubMed: PMID:6385965.

  15. Fuentes Valdés E, Jiménez Paneque R. Riesgo quirúrgico en pacientes mayores de 60 años.Rev Cubana Cir [Internet]. 2000[citado02/05/2019];39(1): 73-81. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932000000100011

  16. Norberg A, Rooyackers O, Segersvärd R, et al. Albumin Kinetics in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136371.Citado en PubMed; PMID: 26313170.

  17. Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(1):81–89.25442089.

  18. Buigues C, Juarros-Folgado P, Fernández-Garrido J, et al. Frailty syndrome and pre-operative risk evaluation: A systematic review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015 Nov- Dec;61(3):309-21. Citado en PubMed:PMID:26272286.

  19. Nazar JC, Zamora HM, Fuentes HR, et al. Paciente adulto mayor y cirugía no cardiaca: ¿Qué debemos hacer? Rev Chil Cir [Internet]. 2015 Jun [citado 01/06/2019]; 67(3): 309-17. Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718- 40262015000300013&lng=es

  20. Zamora Santana O, Rodríguez López-Calleja CA, Hernández Gutiérrez JM, et al. Logros y retos de la colecistectomía laparoscópica en Cuba. Rev Cubana Cir[Internet].2011[citado 01/06/2019];50(4).Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932011000400011

  21. Imbelloni LE. Spinal Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Saudi J Anesth. 2014; 8(4): 477-83.Citado en PubMed; PMID: 4236933.

  22. ONE. Anuario Estadístico de Cuba 2012. Situación demográfica, económica y social de Cuba [Internet]. La Habana: ONE [citado 04/02/2019]; 2012; Disponible en: http://www.one.cu/aec2012/esp/20080618_tabla_cuadro.htm/

  23. Losada H, Silva J, Burgos L. Experiencia en colangiografía endoscópica retrograda en el Hospital Regional de Temuco: Serie de casos con seguimiento. Rev Chil Cir[Internet].2018[citado 01/06/2019];60(1). Disponible en http://scielo.clscielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-40262008000100003




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com