medigraphic.com
ISSN 2448-8747 (Print)
Publicación cuatrimestral editada por la Secretaría de Salud Jalisco

2020, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Sal Jal 2020; 7 (2)

Implicaciones bioéticas en cáncer de mama. Mastectomía radical vs lumpectomía

Pérez-Garmendia R, Garzon-Muvdi J, Castillo-Montero AG, Dávila-Díaz R, Márquez-Espriella C

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 119-124
PDF size: 203.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

With the advances in the medical field a set of new social and legal factors have emerged, forcing health providers to reconsider their medical practice. New expectations from medical providers and patients exceed the classical objectives of medical attention. Few years ago the treatment against breast cancer was mastectomy, with or without radiation therapy. Now with a better understanding of the disease, with better drugs and with a less invasive surgical technique (lumpectomy), the quality of life after treating the disease is one of the most important factors. It is well known that a mastectomy brings depression, anxiety, shame, lack of confidence and suicidal ideas affecting the patient’s quality of life. It’s of great importance to provide a holistic treatment, taking in consideration the results that may affect patient satisfaction and quality of life.


REFERENCES

  1. Casas M. Bases Bioéticas. México: Trillas; 2008.

  2. Goic G, Alejandro. (1999). Tendencias de la medicina actual. Revista médica de Chile, 127(9), 1136-1138. Recuperado en 17 de junio de 2014.

  3. Tom L.Beauchamp-James F. Childress, Principles of Biomedical Ethics (o.c), p. 191

  4. Coleman MP et al. (2008). Cancer survival in fi ve continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol, 9, 730–56.

  5. http://www.who.int/topics/cancer/breastcancer/es/

  6. Hwang ES, Lichtensztajn DY, Gómez SL, Fowble B, Clarke CA. Survival aft er lumpectomy and mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: the eff ect of age and hormone receptor status, Cancer 2013. Apr 1; 119 (7): 1402-11. Doi: 10.1002/cncr, 27795. Epub 2013. Jan 28

  7. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Th e treatment of Early Stage Breast cancer. Bethesda, MD: Author; 1990.

  8. Wording JW, Weisman AD, Th e fallacy in post mastectomy depression Am J Med Sci. 1977; 273: 169-75

  9. Schipper H, Clinch J, Olweny C. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2ª ed. Lippincott: Philadelphia; 1996. Quality of life studies: defi nitions and conceptual issues; pp. 25-35

  10. Patrick D, Erickson P. Oxford University Press. New York; 1993. Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation.

  11. Price B. A model for body-image care. J Adv Nurs. 1990; 15: 585-593

  12. Rytina S. Imagined ugliness. Sci Am Mind. 2008; 19:72-77

  13. Hart, S, Meyerowits BE, Apolone G, Masconi P, Liberati A. Quality of life among mastectomy patients using external breast prostheses. Tumori. 1997; 83:581-586

  14. Wellish DK, Dimatteo R, Silversteim M. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapise: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics. 1989; 30:365-373

  15. Margolis GJ, Goodman RL, Rubin A, Pajac TF. Psychological factors in the choice of treatment breast cancer. Psychosomatics. 1989 Spring; 30(2): 192-7

  16. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lee JK Lippman ME, D Angelo T. Breast conservation versus mastectomy: distress sequel as a function of choice. J Clin Oncol 1989 Mar; 7(3): 367-75

  17. González F. Tratamiento quirúrgico del carcinoma mamario. Rev. Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Méx; 32(3/4):212-7, sept-dic. 1986

  18. http://www.bioeticahoy.com.es/2010/02/principio-de-dobleefecto. html

  19. Guadagnoli E., Ward P review Patient participation in decisión-making. Soc. Sci Med. 1998 Aug; 47 (3): 329-39

  20. Schipper H, Clinch J, Olweny C. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2ª ed. Lippincott: Philadelphia; 1996. Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues; pp. 25-35

  21. Schipper H, Clinch J, Olweny C. Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials. 2ª ed. Lippincott: Philadelphia; 1996. Quality of life studies: definitions and conceptual issues; pp. 25-35

  22. Patrick D, Erickson P. Oxford University Press. New York; 1993. Health status and health policy: Quality of life in health care evaluation and resource allocation.

  23. Price B. A model for body-image care. J Adv Nurs. 1990; 15: 585-593

  24. Rytina S. Imagined ugliness. Sci Am Mind. 2008; 19:72-77

  25. Hart, S, Meyerowits BE, Apolone G, Masconi P, Liberati A. Quality of life among mastectomy patients using external breast prostheses. Tumori. 1997; 83:581-586

  26. Wellish DK, Dimatteo R, Silversteim M. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapise: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics. 1989; 30:365-373




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com