medigraphic.com
ISSN 2174-0798 (Print)
Organo oficial de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría (ALOP)

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2015; 5 (1)

Mandibular second premolar agenesis

Sánchez TMA, Castillo GCM

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 61-69
PDF size: 876.79 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Agenesis is the most frequent of all dental abnormalities, is characterized by the absence of one or more teeth. Although the etiology has not been clearly established, genes PAX9 and MSX1 appear to be involved in the occurrence of dental agenesis. Prevalence of second premolar agenesis is more frequently associated with female patients, resulting in dental problems such as ankylosed deciduous molars, infraocclusion, extrusion of the opposite tooth, inclination of first permanent molars, increase of dental gaps, and reduced development of the alveolar process. Prior to undertaking any treatment, a reliable diagnosis should be reached using panoramic X-rays after the age of 8 years. The aim of this review is to discuss the diagnostic criteria for lower premolar agenesis, focusing on its etiology, prevalence, and the clinical procedures to be followed.


REFERENCES

  1. Vastardis H. The genetics of human tooth agenesis: New discoveries for understanding dental anomalies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 117(6): 650-656.

  2. Artese F. Pergunte a um expert. R Clin Ortodon Dental Press. 2006; 5(1):14 – 23.

  3. Ramos BJ, Echeverri GS. Dentistry and molecular biology: a promising field for tooth agenesis management. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2012; 226(4):243-9.

  4. Ravn JJ, Nielsen HG. A longitudinal radiographic study of the mineralisation of second premolars. Scand J Dent Res. 1977; 88: 365-369.

  5. Schalk-van der Weide Y, Bosman F. Tooth size in relatives of individuals with oligodontia. Arch Oral Biol. 1996; 41(5): 469–472.

  6. Swinnen S, Bailleul-Forestier I, Arte S, Nieminen P, Devriendt K, Carels C. Investigating the etiology of multiple tooth agenesis in three sisters with severe oligodontia. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008; 11(1): 24–31.

  7. Frazier-Bowers SA, et al. A novel mutation in human PAX9 causes molar oligodontia. J Dent Res. 2002; 81(2):129-133.

  8. Schalk – van der Weide Y, et al. Symptomatology of patients with oligodontia. J oral rehabil. 1994; 21(3): 247-261.

  9. Dermaut lR, Goeffers KR, De Smit AA. Prevalence of tooth agenesis correlated with jaw relationship and dental crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.1986; 90(3): 204-210.

  10. Pinho T., Fernandes SA., Bousbaa, H., Maciel P., Mutational analysis of MSX1 and PAX9 genes in Portuguese families with maxillary lateral incisor agenesis. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(5): 582–588.

  11. Graber LW. Congenital absence of teeth: A review with emphasis on inheritance patterns. J Am Dent Assoc.1978; 96(2): 266-275.

  12. Perry GH, Verrelli BC, Stone AC. Molecular evolution of the primate developmental genes MSX1 and PAX9. Mol Biol Evol . 2006. 23(3): 644-654.

  13. Kolenc-Fusé FJ. Agenesias dentarias: en busca de las alteraciones genéticas responsables de la falta de desarrollo. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal.2004; 9(5):385-95.

  14. Faber J. Oligodontia. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial. 2006; 11(2): 16-17.

  15. Klein ML, Nieminen P, Lammi L, Niebuhr E, Kreiborg S. Novel mutation of the initiation codon of PAX9 causes oligodontia. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(1):43-47.

  16. Kim JW, Simmer JP, Lin BPJ, Hu JCC. Novel MSX1 frameshift causes autosomal-dominant oligodontia. J Dent Res. 2006; 85(3): 267-271.

  17. Lavelle CL, Ashton EH, Flinn RM. Cusp pattern, tooth size and third molar agenesis in the human mandibular dentition. Arch Oral Biol. 1970; 15(3): 227-37.

  18. Grahnen H. Hypodontia in the permanent dentition: a clinical and genetical investigation. Odontol. Revy.1956 ;7(3): 1-100.

  19. Glenn FB. Incidence of congenitally missing permanent teeth in aprivate pedodontic practice. ASDC J Dent Child.1961;28:317-20.

  20. Stockton DW, et al. Mutation of PAX9 is associated with oligodontia. Nat Genet. 2000; 24(1): 18-19.

  21. Müller TP, et al. A survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth. J Amer Dent Assoc 1970; 81(1):101-7.

  22. Nik-hussein NH. Hypodontia in the permanentet dentition: a study of its prevalence in Malaysian children. Aust. Orthod j. 1989; 11(2):93-95.

  23. Symons AL, Stritzel F, Stamatiou J. Anomalies associated with hypodontia of the permanent lateral incisor and second premolar. J Clin Pediat Dent 1993;17:109-11.

  24. Ravn JJ, Nielsen HG. A longitudinal radiographic study of the mineralisation of second premolars. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research.1977; 88: 365-369

  25. Thilander B, Myrberg N. The prevalence of maloc- clusion in Swedish school children. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research. 1973; 81: 12-20.

  26. Polder BJ, Van‘t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32(3): 217–226

  27. Chappuzeau LE, Cortés CD, Anomalías de la Dentición en Desarrollo: Agenesias y Supernumerarios, Revista Dental de Chile. 2008; 99 (2): 3-8.

  28. Pineda P, Fuentes R, Sanhueza A. Prevalencia de agenesia dental en niños con dentición mixta de las clínicas odontológicas docente asistencial de la Universidad de La Frontera. Int. J. Morphol.2011; 29(4):1087-1092.

  29. Gomes SC, Garib DG, Carvalho PEG, Cotrim-Ferreira FA, Alencar BM. Epidemiological investigation of second premolar agenesis and its relationship with agenesis of other permanent teeth. Revista de Odontologia da Universidade Cidade de São Paulo. 2009; 21(3): 233-8

  30. Garib DG, Peck S, Gomes SC. Increased occurrence of dental anomalies in patients with second premolar agenesis. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(3):436-41.

  31. Endo T, Sanpei S, Komatsuzaki A, Endo S, Takakuwa A, Oka K. Patterns of tooth agenesis in Japanese subjects with bilateral agenesis of mandibular second premolars. Odontology. 2013;101(2):216-21.

  32. Alvares RC, Tavano O. Curso de radiologia em odontologia. São Paulo. 4ta edição: Santos; 2002.

  33. Freitas A. et al. Radiologia Odontologica. São Paulo. 6ta edição: Artes medicas; 2004.

  34. Garn, S.M.; Lewis, AB.; Polachek, DL. Variability of tooth formation. J Dent Res.1959; 38(1):135-148.

  35. Moorrees CF, Fanning EA, Hunt EE, Jr. Age Variation of Formation Stages for Ten Permanent Teeth. J Dent Res. 1963; 42(6):1490-502.

  36. Lindqvist, B. Extraction of the deciduous second molar in hypodontia. Eur J Orthod.1980; 2(3):173-181.

  37. Da Fonseca, RC, de Freitas KMS, Fonseca-Reis LPK, de Lima DV, Henriques RP. Ausência congênita de segundos pré-molares inferiores tratada com elásticos intermaxilares de Classe II: relato de um caso clínico. Rev. clín. ortodon. Dental Press. 2007; 6(4): 97-105.

  38. Mamopoulou AM, et al. Agenesis of mandibular second premolars. Spontaneous closure after extraction therapy: a four year follow up. Eur J Orthod.1996; 18(6):589-600.

  39. Svedmyr B. Genealogy and consequences of congenitally missing second premolars. Journal of the International Association of Dentistry for Children. 1983; 14(2): 77-82.

  40. Kurol J, Magnusson BC. Infraocclusion of primary molars: An epidemiological study. Scand J Dent Res. 1984; 92(6):564- 576.

  41. Kokich JR, VO. Congenitally missing teeth: orthodontic management in the adolescent patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 121(6): 594-595.

  42. Barbería LE, Boj QJR, Catalá PM, García BC, Mendoza MA. Odontopediatría. Barcelona: 2ª ed. Masson; 2001.

  43. Van der Linden FPG, Wassenberg HJW, Bakker PJM. Aspectos Generales del desarrollo de la dentición. Rev Esp Ortod. 1980;10(1):2-13.

  44. McDonald RE, Avery DR. Odontología pediátrica y el adolescente. Madrid: 6ªed. Harcourt Brace; 1998.

  45. Rune B, Sarnas KV. Root resorption and submergence in retained deciduous second molars. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6(2): 123-131.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com