medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 28

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2018; 7 (28)

Developing critical thinking through the application of high fidelity simulation on medical students

Segura-Azuara NÁ, Valencia CJL, López CMV
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 55-63
PDF size: 562.08 Kb.


Key words:

Clinical simulation, Critical thinking, Pathophysiology.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Critical thinking explores the causes and consequences of actions that lead to the knowledge generation, this is vital for the training of health professionals. One commonly used strategy for its development is clinical simulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical simulation develops critical thinking in medical students.
Method: This is a quantitative, descriptive and quasi-experimental study, in which 46 students participated. As an instrument, the Individual Generic Skills Test was used to assess critical thinking in three dimensions: Interpretation and analysis of information; Judgment of a specific situation with objective and subjective data; and Inference of the consequences of the decision based on self-regulated judgment. Two cases were designed and applied: acute renal failure and glomerulonephritis. As part of the analysis we used the t-student test as well as descriptive statistics.
Results: When comparing the general average obtained in the critical thinking competence, a t-student of 0.1549 was obtained, indicating with a 95% confidence interval that the means did not have a significant difference. No significant differences were found when comparing the means by dimension.
Conclusions: The evidence from this study indicates that the simulation does not develop critical thinking skills. One explanation for the small difference between pre and post-test results was the short time elapsed between the first and second application of the questionnaire. In the future, this experience will be repeated, leaving more time between evaluations, which would allow a closer image of the students’ development.


REFERENCES

  1. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226-35.

  2. Abreu Hernández LF, Cid García ÁN, Herrera Correa G, Lara Vélez JVM, Laviada Delgadillo R, Rodríguez Arroyo C, et al. Perfil por Competencias del Médico General Mexicano. México: Asociación Mexicana de Facultades y Escuelas de Medicina; 2008.

  3. Issenberg SB, Mcgaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10-28.

  4. Ker J, Bradley P. Simulation in Medical Education. In: Understanding Medical Education: Evidence, Theory and Practice. Wiley Blackwell; 2010.164-80.

  5. Owen H. Early Use of Simulation in Medical Education. Simul Healthc. 2012;7:102-16.

  6. Valencia Castro JL, Tapia Vallejo S, Olivares Olivares SL. La simulación clínica como estrategia para el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en estudiantes de medicina. Inv Ed Med. 2016. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riem.2016.08.003.

  7. Bustos-Álvarez J. Aprendizaje basado en problemas y simulación clínica: aprendiendo por competencias en la educación en salud. Rev Hisp Cienc Salud. 2015;1:117-20.

  8. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, Demaria S, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The Utility of Simulation in Medical Education: What Is the Evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76:330-43.

  9. Swamy M, Sawdon M, Barbaro-Brown A, Mclachlan J, Charles J, Swamy M, et al. A study to investigate the effectiveness of SimMan as an adjunct in teaching preclinical skills to medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14(231).

  10. Konia M, Yao A. Simulation-a new educational paradigm? J Biomed Res. 2013;27(2):75-80.

  11. Weller JM. Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice. Med Educ. 2004;38(1):32-8.

  12. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does Simulation-Based Medical Education With Deliberate Practice Yield Better Results Than Traditional Clinical Education? A Meta-Analytic Comparative Review of the Evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706-11.

  13. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):50-63.

  14. Nara N, Beppu M, Tohda S, Suzuki T. The Introduction and Effectiveness of Simulation-based Learning in Medical Education. Intern Med. 2009;48(10):1515-9.

  15. Jimeìnez A. EnsenÞar a pensar. Madrid: Ediciones Palabra; 1994.

  16. Baron J. Thinking and Deciding. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.

  17. Arbaiza Fermini L. Desarrollo de competencias gerenciales: un modelo alternativo. Buenos Aires: Cengage; 2011.

  18. Olivares SL, López MV. Medición de la autopercepción de la autodirección en estudiantes de medicina de pregrado. Inv Ed Med. 2015;4(14):75-80.

  19. Villa A, Poblete M. Aprendizaje basado en competencias : una propuesta para la evaluacioìn de las competencias geneìricas. Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero; 2007.

  20. Facione P, Gittens C. Think critically. Prentice Hall; 2011.

  21. Rubio JC. Papel de Enfermería en el Juicio Clínico: La Valoración y el Diagnóstico. Enferm Cardiol. 2014;21(61):25-31.

  22. Redelmeier DA, Ferris LE, Tu J V, Hux JE, Schull MJ. Problems for clinical judgement: introducing cognitive psychology as one more basic science. CMAJ. 2001;164(3):358.

  23. Haynes SN. Juicio Clínico y Diseño de Programas de Intervención Conductual- Estimación de la Magnitud de los Efectos de la Intervención. Psicología Conductual.1994;2(2):165-84.

  24. Villarroel Salinas JC, Ribeiro Dos Santos Q, Bernal Hinojosa N. Razonamiento Clínico- Su Déficit Actual y la importancia del aprendizaje de un Método durante la formación de la Competencia Clínica del Futuro Médico. Rev Cient Cienc Méd. 2014;17(1), 29-36.

  25. Viesca C, Ponce de Leon ME, Sánchez Mendiola M. El Ejercicio Actual de la Medicina, Razonamiento clínico México: Facultad de Medicina UNAM. 2016.

  26. Mulnix JW. Thinking Critically about Critical Thinking. EPAT. 2012;44(5):464-79.

  27. Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, Baptista Lucio P, Casas Pérez MDLL. Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill; 2006.

  28. Kaddoura MA. New Graduate Nurses’ Perceptions of the Effects of Clinical Simulation on Their Critical Thinking, Learning, and Confidence. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2010 Nov 1;41(11):506-16.

  29. Schumacher L. The Impact of Utilizing High-Fidelity Human Patient Simulation on Critical Thinking Abilities and Learning Outcomes in Undergraduate Nursing Students; 2005.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2018;7