medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2000, Number 4

<< Back

Cir Gen 2000; 22 (4)

Advances in the treatment of small bowel trauma

Rojano ME, Peñaloza JE, Sánchez SA, Pineda BF, Mercado AJA, Arcos HC, Treviño PS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 392-394
PDF size: 29.83 Kb.


Key words:

Trauma, small bowel, history of surgery.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To inform on the historical antecedents of small bowel trauma.
Setting: Second level health care hospital.
Methodology: A historical study was performed, analyzing 11 references that describe the first historical events in the identification of small bowel traumatic injuries.
Results: The first antecedent on small bowel lesions is found in the “Surgical Papyrus of Smith”. References are then made to the findings of Aristoteles and Hippocrates in regard to blunt and penetrating traumas, respectively. The first attempt to repair such a lesion is attributed to De Salicet, an Italian surgeon, in 1720; Sacherus was the first to accomplish it successfully in the XVI century. In the XIX century, two trends developed, one formed by the interventionists, who performed celiotomies to treat these lesions and that of the abstentionists, who were opposed to any surgical maneuver to treat these lesions. In 1904, a surgeon named Bedroitz achieves excellent results by treating wounded in the battlefields. By the time of World War One, the surgical treatment of bowel lesions is more liberally used. Although its use reduced somewhat the mortality rate, it was not until World War Two that it became successful in reducing considerably the death rate.
Conclusion: It is relevant to know the historical antecedents of small bowel injury treatment to understand better the evolution of the diagnostic and therapeutic methods used to treat them.


REFERENCES

  1. Loria FL. Historical aspects of penetrating wound of the abdomen. Int Abstr Surg 1948; 87: 52.

  2. Wisner DH. Injury to the stomach and small bowel. In: Feliciano VD, Moore EE, Mattox LK. Trauma, 3th ed, Appleton & Lang Stamford, Connecticut 1991: 551-571.

  3. Citado por: Nelson RL, Nyhus LM. Cirugía del intestino delgado. Salvat, España 1990: 7-11.

  4. Citado por: Root HD. Hollow visceral injuries. In. Maull KI. Advances in trauma. Year Book Medical Publisher, Chicago 1978.

  5. Vassy LE, Klecker RL, Koch E, Morse TS. Traumatic gastric perforation in children from blunt trauma. J Trauma 1975; 15: 184-6.

  6. Poer DH, Woliver E. Intestinal and mesenteric injury due to nonpenetrating abdominal trauma. JAMA 1942; 118: 11-15.

  7. Newing A. Rupture of the small bowell in association with procedentia. Med J Aust 1955; 2: 901.

  8. Spencer WG. Celsus. De medicine. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press. 1938. Citado en: Wilkinson JD. The history of trauma anaesthesia. In: Grande CM. Textbook of trauma anesthesia and critical care. Mosby, St. Louis Missouri 1993:1-34.

  9. Christensen N. Small bowel and mesentery. In: Blaisdell FW. Abdominal Trauma. Thieme-Stratton, New York, 1982.

  10. Stevens SL, Maull KI. Lesiones de intestino delgado. Clin Quir Norte Am 1990; 70: 549-68.

  11. Beebe GW, Debakey ME. Battle casualties: incidence, mortality, and logistic considerations. Ed. Springfield K. Charles, New York, 1952: 118-124.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2000;22