Rodea TED

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 1263-1274
PDF size: 318.07 Kb.

ABSTRACT

To me It is interesting to point out the political use of the methodology, qualitative and quantitative, to discuss the form that this practice acquires. It is important to call into question this policy that subjects the word of the aspiring researcher by requiring him to abandon the subjective for the objective (quantitative methodology) or submit the subjectivity to a theoretical-Orthodox regime to narrate intimations experiences through research (qualitative methodology). Both methodologies claim to know and because of that they subject the view and the writing in favor of a "scientific" speech. I suggest that there is a relationship between researcher and method that subdue any interpretation from which derives a political use of methodology that can be framed as fetishism, understood as any affective relationship, of trust and submission as the only way to understand the world. The term "fetish" which was originally used in the field of the economy, move to the field of the clinic to describe the objective libidinal consumption always linked to the unconscious. In this way the method mediates pleasure when the subject is in front of the object of research even represent surrender, distance and emotional security, smoothing all bias of abnormality, from there the importance to question scientific education and it is effects.

REFERENCES

1. Bauman, Z. (2000). Modernidad líquida. Fondo de cultura económica.

2. Byung-Chul, H. (2014). Psicopolítica. Neoliberalismo y Nuevas Técnicas de Poder. España, Ed. Herder.

3. Camacho, E. (2012). Interacciones Sociales En Contingencias De Cooperación y Competencia: ¿Comportamiento Suplementario o Sustitutivo? Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta. 38 (2) 22-38.

4. Cook, T. D. y Reichardt, CH. S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, California, USA. Sage.

5. Fernández, P. y Pértegas D. (2002). Investigación cuantitativa y cualitativa. La Coruña, España. Unidad de Epidemiología Clínica y Bioestadística. Complejo Hospitalario-Universitario Juan Canalejo-Cad Aten. Primaria 2002:76-78. Recuperado de: https://www.google.com/url?sa=tyrct=jyq=yesrc=sysource=webycd=yved=2ahUKEwi72brxlNLpAhWO_J4KHRjACUUQFjAAegQIBhAByurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.fisterra.com%2Fgestor%2Fupload%2Fguias%2Fcuanti_cuali2.pdfyusg=AOvVaw2K-OXyM9qoubMzdU8LT9XB

6. Fernández S. (1997). El valor de educar. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.

7. Feyerabend, P. K. (1986). Tratado Contra el método. Madrid, Editorial Tecnos.

8. Lacan, J. (1994). Seminario 4. La relación de objeto. Buenos Aires, Argentina. Editorial Paidós.

9. Taylor, S. y Bogdan, R. (1996). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. España, Ediciones Paidos Ibérica.

10. Zizek, S. (2001). El sublime objeto de la ideología. Argentina, Siglo XXI.