medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Panorama Cuba y Salud

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Cuba y Salud 2019; 14 (S1)

Evaluation of the partial exam of Community Medicine at the Latin American School of Medicine. 2017-2018

Viera MCI, Urrutia FOL, García DG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 124-126
PDF size: 293.31 Kb.


Key words:

evaluation, written evaluation instrument, formative evaluation.

ABSTRACT

The evaluation regulates the teaching and learning process, provides feedback to teachers and has an important educational function. The elaboration of written evaluation instruments that fulfill the functions of the evaluation is a challenge for the teachers and the main professors of the subjects of the main discipline integrating the Medicine career. The objective of this work was to evaluate the quality of the written partial exam of the Community Medicine course. The group of researchers chose the methodology used for several years by Professor MSc. Pedro Augusto Díaz Rojas to evaluate the quality of the instruments. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out in which all the exams performed by the students were analyzed (1006), in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet the results of the applied test were tabulated, those of each item categorized in correct were included ( c) and incorrect (i), the qualification of each question and the final grade of the exam, for subsequent statistical processing, checking the correspondence of the time fund allocated in P1 to the contents and quantity of items that explore most of the items and Exam questions were considered of medium difficulty, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.60 pointing out that it is a reliable instrument. The written partial exam is evaluated as reliable, with the required quality, and most of the items were classified as medium difficulty.


REFERENCES

  1. González Menéndez R. La evaluación de objetivos educativos. Rev Cubana Educ Med Sup 1990; 4(1):42-49.

  2. Gonzalez Perez M. La evaluación del aprendizaje: tendencias y reflexión crítica. Rev Cubana Educ Med Sup 2001; 15(1).

  3. Cordero Miranda Y. Necesidades de aprendizaje sobre la elaboración de instrumentos evaluativos escritos. Rev.Educ Med Super vol.27 no.2 Ciudad de la Habana abr.-jun. 2013

  4. Rojas Díaz P.Metodología para determinar la calidad de los instrumentos de evaluación.Rev.Educ Med Super vol.27 no.2 Ciudad de la Habana abr.-jun. 2013

  5. Salas Perea R. La evaluación en la educación superior contemporánea. La Paz: Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, 1998.

  6. Backhoff E, Larrazolo N, Rosas M. Nivel de dificultad y poder de discriminación del Examen de Habilidades y Conocimientos Básicos (EXHCOBA). Rev Electrón Invest Educ.2000.[citado 2 oct 2013];2(1).Disponible en: http://redie.uabc.mx/ojs/index.php/redie/article/view/15

  7. Ortiz Romero G, María Rodríguez N, Díaz Rojas PA, Cuenca Font K Perfeccionamiento de la calidad de los instrumentos evaluativos en la asignatura Metodología de la Investigación y Estadística. Rev Educ Médica 2014 octubre-diciembre vol.18 no.4 Holguín.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cuba y Salud. 2019;14