medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2020, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2020; 65 (4)

Use of different conservation methods of septal cartilage. A comparison of four systems

Salas-Galicia JE, Ramírez-Ojeda H, López-Infante F, Sánchez-Cisneros R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 168-174
PDF size: 273.49 Kb.


Key words:

Cartilage, Saline solution, Hartmann solution, Transplants.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare different methods of conservation of septal cartilage.
Material and Method: A prospective, longitudinal, analytical, observational study was done from March 1st 1987 to March 1st 1988, in which septal cartilage was taken from healthy patients undergoing elective septumplastia and stored in four different media: 0.9% saline, Hartmann solution, 1:1000 white merthiolate and 70% ethyl alcohol in standard refrigeration of 5ºC. Histological studies with light microscopy of the samples and bacteriological studies of the storage media were carried out at 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days.
Results: Cartilage presented in saline and Hartmann solution remained well preserved up to 365 days, while those preserved in white merthiolate and alcohol showed varying degrees of nuclear and cytoplasmic alterations from 30 days. Bacteriological samplings were negative in all groups.
Conclusions: Septal cartilages are conserved in good state in Hartmann or saline solution at 0.9% in standard refrigeration of 5ºC up to 365 days.


REFERENCES

  1. Naujos J. Ohnsorge P. Hormung S. Consulting office tissue banks. HNO 1978; 26: 325-9.

  2. López Infante F, Mocayta H. Una manera diferente de conservar los cartílagos para ser usados en cirugía nasal. XXXVI Congr Nal de la SMORL y CCC, Puerto Vallarta, Mayo 1986.

  3. Kerr A, Byme J, Smyth G. Cartilage homografts in the middle ear: A long-term histological study. J Laryngol Otol 1973; 87: 1193-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100078166

  4. Ham A. Histology 7th ed. WB Saunders Co. Philadelphia, 1975; 343-51.

  5. Leeson R, Leeson T. Histology. 3rd editon. WB Saunders Co. Philadelphia, 1976; 126-51.

  6. Gutiérrez C, Stoksted P. Columella implants. Reconstruction of the anterior septum. Arch Otolaryngol 1982; 108: 243-6. doi:10.1001/archotol.1982.00790520043012

  7. Mc Carthy L. Establishing a preserved cartilage bank. Plast Rec Surg 1948; 3: 283-6.

  8. Iwanaga N, Mori H, Yamomoto E, Toda y, Fukumoto M. The fate of Homologous nasal septal cartilages in tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1986; 101: 206-13. doi: 10.3109/00016488609132843

  9. Pappas J, Bailey H, Mc Grew R, Graham S. Homograft septal cartilage for attic support in intact canal Wall tympanomastoidectomy and timpanoplasty. Laryngoscope 1981; 91: 1457-62.

  10. Yamamoto E, Iwanaga M, Morinaka S. Use of micro-sliced homograft cartilage plates in tympanoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol 1985; 419: 123-9.

  11. Laurian N, Zohar Y, Turani H. Histolohic findings in Larynx reconstructed by a nasoseptal autograft after partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope, 1983; 93: 1481-2.

  12. Butcher R, Dunham M. Composite nasal septal cartilage graft for reconstruction after extended frontolateral hemilaryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1984; 94: 959-62. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198407000-00019

  13. Martinelly D, Janowak M. Repair of laryngeal stenosis with nasal septal graft. Ann Otol 1976; 85: 600-8. https://doi.or g/10.1177%2F000348947608500506

  14. Laurian N, Zohar Y. Laryngeal recostruction by composite nasalmucoseptal graft after partial laryngectomy. Three years followup. Laryngoscope 1981; 91: 609-16. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198104000-00015

  15. Zohar Y, et al. Laryngeal reconstruction by composite nasoseptal graft after extended partial laryngectomy. Twelve-year follow-up. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 114 (8): 868-871. doi:10.1001/archotol. 1988.01860200052016

  16. Duncancavage J, Tochill R. Composite nasal septal graft reconstruction of the partial larygectomized canine. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978; 86: 285-90. doi: 10.1177/019459987808600219

  17. Jakse R, Wolfgruber H. Use of allogeneic septal cartilage in the correction of the saddle nose. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1986; 62: 679-83.

  18. Tardy E, Denneny J, Fritsch M. The versatile cartilage autograft in the reconstruction of the nose and face. Laryngoscope 1985; 95: 523-33. doi: 10.1288/00005537- 198505000-00003

  19. Peer L, Walker C. Behavior of autogenous septal cartilage after transplantation in human tissue. Arch Otolaryngol 1943; 38: 156-62.

  20. Peer L. Fate of autogenous septal cartilage after transplantion in human tissue. Arch Otolaryngol 1941; 34: 696-709. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1941.00660040752002

  21. Malinin T, Martinez O, Brown M. Banking of massive osteoarticular and intercalary bone allograft. 12 years experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1985; 197: 44-50.

  22. Sabiston D. Tratado de patología quirúrgica. 7ª ed. Interamericana. 1980; 88-110.

  23. Litter M. Compendio de farmacología. 2ª ed. El Ateneo, 1979; 486-507.

  24. Pepose J, Pardo F, Kessler J, et. al. Screening cornea donors for antibodies against human inmunodeficiency virus. Ophthalmology 1987; 94: 95-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0161-6420(87)33489-X

  25. Pepose J, McRaes H, Queen R, et al. The impact of the AIDS epidemic on corneal transplantation. Am J Ophthalmology 1985; 100: 610-13. doi: 10.1016/0002- 9394(85)90692-0

  26. Conte J. Infection with human immunodeficiency virus in the hospital. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 730-6. https:// doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-105-5-730




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2020;65