medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-297X (Print)

2020, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Estomatol 2020; 57 (1)

Marginal sealing applying sodium hypochlorite versus phosphoric acid as dental conditioner

Cayo RCF, Cristal CMAA

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page:
PDF size: 180.80 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Microfiltration is one of the main problems of all resin sealings. Many studies aim to optimize marginal sealing using a variety of conditioners, such as sodium hypochlorite, which allows good penetration of the adhesive by generating deproteinization, and phosphoric acid, which allows removal of the dental smear layer, thus creating a hybrid layer when the adhesive is placed.
Objective: Evaluate the marginal sealing degree of Bulk Fill resin applying 10% sodium hypochlorite gel versus 37% phosphoric acid gel in in vitro dental conditioning.
Methods: The study universe was 72 teeth with class I cavities, divided into four groups of 18 teeth. Upon sealing, thermal cycling was performed at 500 cycles from 5 ºC to 55 ºC. Next the teeth were submerged in 2% methylene blue for 12 h and 24 h at a temperature of 37 ºC. Finally marginal sealing was evaluated in the stereo microscope according to ISO/TS 11405: 2015, using the following scale: grade 0 (no microfiltration), grade 1 (microfiltration as far as the enamel), grade 2 (microfiltration as far as the dentin), and grade 3 (microfiltration as far as the pulp floor).
Results: Conditioning with 37% phosphoric acid was grade 0 (55.6%) and grade 1 (33.3%) at 12 h, and grade 1 (55.6%) at 24 h, whereas conditioning with 10% sodium hypochlorite was grade 0 (44.4%) at 12 h, and predominantly grade 1 (55.6 %) at 24 h. Hypothesis contrast in related samples yielded 37% phosphoric acid and 10% sodium hypochlorite at 12 h and 24 h, p= 0.052 and p= 0.584, respectively. Comparison between independent samples at 12 h and 24 h yielded p= 0.462 and p= 0.406, respectively.
Conclusions: The 10% sodium hypochlorite gel has similar marginal sealing effectiveness as the 37% phosphoric acid gel when used as dental conditioners.


REFERENCES

  1. Hirata R. TIPS: Claves en odontología estética. Buenos Aires: Médica Panamericana; 2012.

  2. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010 [acceso 02/03/2019];26(2):100-21. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20006379

  3. Corral C, Vildósola P, Beresezio C, Alves Dos Campos E, Fernández E. Revisión del estado actual de resinas compuestas Bulk Fill. Revista de Odontología de la Universidad de Antioquia. 2015 [acceso 02/03/2019];27(1):177-96. Disponible en: https://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/odont/article/view/19805/2058 9

  4. Souza FB, Vicente da Silva CH, Beatrice LCS. Relación de la dentina desproteinizada con el proceso adhesivo. Acta Odontol Venez. 2005 [acceso 02/03/2019];43(2):171-6. Disponible en: https://www.actaodontologica.com/ediciones/2005/2/relacion_dentina_desproteinizad a_proceso_adhesivo.asp

  5. Garaicoa Pazmiño C. Valoración del uso del hipoclorito de sodio al 5,25% y sus efectos en la adhesión. Tesis para obtener grado de cirujano dentista. Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil; 2011 [acceso 02/03/2019]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ucsg.edu.ec/handle/3317/846

  6. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed.Mater Res. 1982 [acceso 02/03/2019];16:265-73. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7085687

  7. Spencer O, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int. 1999 [acceso 02/03/2019];30(7):501-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10635264

  8. Thanatvarakorn O, Prasansuttiporn T, Thittaweerat S, Foxton RM, Ichinose S, Tagami J, et al. Smear layer-deproteinizing improves bonding of one-step self-etch adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2018 [acceso 02/03/2019];34(3):434-41. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  9. Tartari T, Bachmann L, Maliza A, Andrade F, Duarte A, Bramante C. Tissue dissolution and modifications in dentin composition by different sodium hypoclorite concentrations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 [acceso 02/03/2019];24(3):291-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27383711

  10. Ribeiro A, Dantas D, Guenes G, Araujo R, Cyrillo C, Braz R. Ação dos agentes desproteinizantes e antioxidantes sobre a resistência de união a 68 microtração de sistemas adesivos convencionais. Rev Gaúcha Odontolog, Porto Alegre. 2011 [acceso 02/03/2019];59(2):221-7. Disponible en: http://www.revistargo.com.br/include/getdoc.php?id=6355&article=1778&mode=pdf

  11. Thanatvarakorn O, Nakajima M, Prasansuttiporn T, Ichinose S, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of smear layer deproteinizing on resin-dentine interface with self-etch adhesive. J Dent. 2014 [acceso 02/03/2019];42(3):298-304. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24321293

  12. Pasaca Mamani MG. Influencia del hipoclorito de sodio al 5 % en la fuerza de adhesión de los sistemas adhesivos en dentina. Tesis para obtener grado de cirujano dentista. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2017 [acceso 02/03/2019]. Disponible en: http://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/cybertesis/7488

  13. Hegde MN, Bhide SP. Nanoleakage phenomenon on deproteinized human dentin - an in vitro study. Indian J Dent. 2012 [acceso 02/03/2019];3(1):5-9. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0975962X12600033

  14. Retamal AF, Retamal J, Bader Mattar M. In vitro comparative analysis of microleakage in composites resin restorations made with a conventional and a modified acid etch technique. Rev Clin Periodoncia Implantol Rehabil Oral. 2014 [acceso 02/03/2019];7(1):8-11. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719- 01072014000100002

  15. Alshaikh KH, Hamama HHH, Mahmoud SH. Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Restor Dent Endod. 2018 [acceso 02/03/2019];43(2):1-16. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29765895

  16. ISO/TS 11405:2015 - Dentistry -- Testing of adhesion to tooth structure [acceso 02/03/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.iso.org/standard/62898.html

  17. Soria Vidal L. Efecto de la desproteinización de dentina con gel de hipoclorito de sodio al 5% con clorhexidina y la técnica convencional sobre la fuerza de adhesión de adhesivos dentales a dentina en premolares sanos. Tesis para obtener grado de cirujano dentista. Universidad Católica de Santa María. Arequipa-Perú; 2016 [acceso 02/03/2019]. Disponible en: http://tesis.ucsm.edu.pe/repositorio/handle/UCSM/5562




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com