medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2020, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2020; 88 (12)

Prevalence of dual incontinence

Jiménez-Vieyra CR, Solache-Blanco L, García-Bello JA

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 839-843
PDF size: 175.66 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients with dual incontinence.
Materials and Methods: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional and ambilective study conducted at the Hospital de Ginecoobstetricia 3 of the Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018. Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with urinary incontinence. Exclusion criteria: Incomplete clinical record. Study parameters: age, obstetric history, comorbidities and magnitude of incontinence (Distress Inventory Scale; UDI-6). Central tendency and dispersion measures, frequencies and proportions were calculated with the SPSS statistical package version 20.0.
Results: 775 patients were studied of which 21 (2.7%) had dual incontinence. Average age was 63.0 ± 10.9 years, the most frequent was between 66 and 70 (6 of 21 patients). The most frequent number of pregnancies was 3 (7 of 21), and 18 of 21 had had at least one dystocia. The most frequent comorbidity was diabetes (7 of 21). According to the Distress Inventory Scale (UDI-6) the most common form was moderate (10 of 21), followed by severe (9 of 21).
Conclusions: The frequency of dual incontinence was 2.7%. Multiparity and history of dystocia, diabetes, and moderate and severe forms were the most common.


REFERENCES

  1. Abrams P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. The International Continence Society Committee on Standardization of Terminology. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1988; 114: 5-19. doi. 10.1016/s0090- 4295(02)02243-4.

  2. Whitehead WE, et al. Treatment options for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44 (1): 131-42; 142-144. doi. 10.1007/bf02234835

  3. Matthews CA, et al. Risk factors for urinary, fecal, or dual incontinence in the Nurses’ Health Study. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122 (3): 539-45. doi. 10.1097/ AOG.0b013e31829efbff

  4. Burgio KL, et al. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J Urol. 1991; 146 (5): 1255-9. doi. 10.1016/s0022- 5347(17)38063-1

  5. Johanson JF, Lafferty J. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: the silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996; 91 (1): 33-6.

  6. Leung FW, Schnelle JF. Urinary and Fecal Incontinence in Nursing Home Residents. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2008; 37 (3): 697. doi. 10.1016/j,gtc2008.06.005

  7. Wu JM, et al. Urinary, fecal, and dual incontinence in older U.S. adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63 (5): 947-53. doi.10.1111/jgs.13385.

  8. Camtosun A, et al. An evaluation of fecal incontinence in women with urinary incontinence. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016; 20: 1918-22.

  9. Bliss DZ, et al. Time to and predictors of dual incontinence in older nursing home admissions. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018; 37 (1): 229-36. doi. 10.1002/nau.23279.

  10. Chiang L, et al. Dually incontinent nursing home residents: clinical characteristics and treatment differences. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48 (6): 673-6. doi. 10.1111/j.1532- 5415.2000.tb04727.x

  11. Bump R. Racial comparisons and contrasts in urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81 (3): 421.

  12. Mattox TF, Bhatia NN. The prevalence of urinary incontinence or prolapse among white and Hispanic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174 (2): 646-8. doi. 10.1016/ s0002-9378(96)70443-x

  13. Remes-Troche JM, et al. Incontinencia fecal en adultos mayores. Rev Invest Clín 2004; 56 (1): 21-6.

  14. Martínez ECJ, et al. Prevalencia de incontinencia urinaria y anal en mujeres de la zona metropolitana de Guadalajara. Ginecol Obstet Méx 2006; 74 (6): 300-5.

  15. IMSS. Detección, diagnóstico y tratamiento Inicial de Incontinencia urinaria en la Mujer. Guía Práctica Clínica. 2009; 49.

  16. MacLennan AH, et al. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000; 107 (12): 1460-70. doi. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000. tb11669.x

  17. Wilson PD, et al. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996; 103 (2): 154-61. doi. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09668.x

  18. Eason E, et al. Anal incontinence after childbirth. CMAJ. 2002; 166 (3): 326-30.

  19. Bollard RC, et al. Anal sphincter injury, fecal and urinary incontinence: A 34-year follow-up after forceps delivery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003; 46 (8): 1083-88. doi. 10.1007/ s10350-004-7284-8




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com