medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Investigación en Educación Médica

ISSN 2007-5057 (Print)
Investigación en Educación Médica
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 37

<< Back Next >>

Inv Ed Med 2021; 10 (37)

Virtual Field Work in Qualitative Research

Hamui SL, Vives VT
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 71-77
PDF size: 351.87 Kb.


Key words:

Qualitative research, methodological design, information gathering, videoconference platforms.

ABSTRACT

Restrictions imposed by health contingency and the risk of contagion have influenced mobility and modalities of interactions. The aim of this work is to explore the plurality of options for the co-generation and collection of material in the fieldwork phase within qualitative research projects. The text goes through the methodological design components: participating subjects, available technological resources, pre-meeting agreements and plan analysis, and considers the transformations involved in the virtual modality. Subsequently this paper discusses how the virtual environment open up new possibilities for investigating and processing data. Technological mediation builds new communication channels that call for a wide variety of profiles with diverse intersectional characteristics. Formats are also pluralized to process and present research findings such as documentary videos, infographics, photo montages, comics, animations, texts with different literary genres, among others. The shift in field strategies affects also at the epistemological level, the construction of knowledge at different levels, through situational and experiential narratives, is composed with relational understanding, emotions and descriptions expressed in virtual spaces. However, the maintenance of ethical considerations of fieldwork in virtual mode are unquestionable. Faced with the new normality, there are at least three responses to the challenges related with the information collection or the co-construction of data: to keep the original project as far as possible and pursuit the possibility to foster physical encounters while maintaining healthy distance and other hygienic measures. The second answer is to move face-to-face encounters into virtual spaces, and the third is to think of new research modalities and create narratives in innovative formats using versatile technologies.


REFERENCES

  1. Gray L, Wong-Wylie G, Rempel G, Cook K. Expanding Qualitative Research Interviewing Strategies: Zoom Video Communications. The Qualitative Report; Fort Lauderdale. 2020; 25(5):1292-301.

  2. Cater J. SKYPE – A Cost-effective Method for Qualitative Research. Rehabilitation Counselors & Educators Journal. 2011;4(2):3-4.

  3. Janghorban R, Latifnejad Roudsari R, Taghipour A. Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being. 2014;9(1):241- 52. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v9.24152.

  4. Hannah D, Wakefield K. Skype Interviewing: Reflections of Two PhD Researchers. Qualitative Research. 2014;14(5):603- 16. DOI: 10.1177/1468794113488126.

  5. Chanfrault Duchet MF. El sistema interaccional del relato de vida. María Jiménez (traducción). Ponencia presentada en el Coloquio sobre Pragmática. Italia: Universidad de Urbino; 1985. p. 195-214.

  6. Geertz C. La interpretación de las culturas. España: Gedisa; 1996. p. 19-40.

  7. Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and technics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1990. p. 20-50.

  8. Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st Century. En: Denzin N, Lincoln W (Ed) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. p. 507-35.

  9. Jackson A, Mazzei L. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London: Routledge; 2012. p.100-60.

  10. Cisterna F. Categorización y triangulación como procesos de validación del conocimiento en investigación cualitativa. Theoria. 2005;14(1):61-71.

  11. Reissman C. Narrative methods in the human sciences. New York: Sage; 2008.

  12. Hamui L. Entramado teórico metodológico en la investigación de las narrativas del padecer. En: Hamui L, Vargas B, Fuentes L, et. al. Aproximaciones teórico metodológicas a las narrativas del padecer. México: Manual Moderno, Facultad de Medicina UNAM; 2019.

  13. Berger P, Luckmann T. La construcción social de la realidad. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editores; 1991.

  14. Tratado de la Organización Mundial de Propiedad Intelectual sobre Derecho de Autor (WCT). [consultado: 1 noviembre 2020]. Disponible en: https://wipolex.wipo.int/es/text/295167




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Inv Ed Med. 2021;10