medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 2

Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (2)

Ultrasound-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a referral center in Southeast Mexico

Magaña-González JE, Monzón-Falconi JF, Cruz-Nuricumbo E, Cruz-Ordoñez SX, Flores-Tapia JP, Esqueda-Mendoza A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 1-13
PDF size: 342.48 Kb.


Key words:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Renal access, Ultrasound, Guy’s stone score.

ABSTRACT

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy is the treatment of choice for staghorn stones and large kidney stones (bigger than 2 cm). Percutaneous renal access can be achieved, whether guided by ultrasound or fluoroscopy. The method of choice depends on training and personal preference. Ultrasound has various strengths as an intervention tool and several advantages over fluoroscopy: it is easily available, portable, relatively inexpensive, and there is no radiation exposure. Even though the skilled use of those techniques involves a learning curve, employing them can result in lower radiation exposure to the patients, urologist, and medical assistants, when performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Objectives: To describe the surgical technique and the clinical characteristics of the patients that underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy, with ultrasound-guided renal access, at the Hospital Regional De Alta Especialidad de la Península de Yucatán, within the time frame of January 2019 and January 2021.
Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive, observational study was carried out utilizing the medical files of 22 patients diagnosed with kidney stones and corroborated through tomography that underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasound- guided puncture.
Results: Twenty-two percutaneous nephrolithotomies with ultrasound-guided renal access were performed within the time frame of January 2019 and January 2021. A total of 72.7% of the patients were women and 27.3% were men. Fifty percent of the patients were obese, 68.2% had an ASA 2 anesthetic risk, 22.7% an ASA 3, and 9.1% (2) an ASA 1. According to the Guy’s Stone Score, 40.9% of the patients had grade III stones and 27.3% had grade IV. Among the surgical characteristics: the tract was established by an endourology fellow in 45.5% of the patients, by an R5 in 22.7%, an R4 in 9.1%, and by an endourology staff physician in 22.7%. A total of 45.5% of the patients required one puncture, 5 patients required two, 5 patients required three, one patient required four, and one patient required more than five punctures. Tract creation was successful in 95.5% of the patients and failed in only one. Puncture was carried out employing the Valdivia/ Galdakao position in 90.0% (20) of the patients and the prone position in 9.1%. A single tract was established in 95.5%.
Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy is a safe, effective, radiation-free, and low-cost technique that can be used at any hospital. The technique requires structured training, which should begin at the residency level.


REFERENCES

  1. Knoll T, Daels F, Desai J, Hoznek A, Knudsen B, Montanari E, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: technique. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1361–8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017- 2001-0

  2. Carrion Monsalve D, Cansino J, Quintana L, Rivas J, Mainez J, Pérez-Carral J, et al. Prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy: ItS advantages and our technique for puncture. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2018; 7:950–9. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.10.04

  3. Zhou X, Gao X, Wen J, Xiao C. Clinical value of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position under the guidance of real-time ultrasound: report of 92 cases. Urol Res. 2008;36(2):111–4. doi: 10.1007/s00240-008-0134-8

  4. Hosseini MM, Hassanpour A, Farzan R, Yousefi A, Afrasiabi MA. Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(4):603–7. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0213

  5. Yan S, Xiang F, Yongsheng S. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy guided solely by ultrasonography: a 5-year study of >700 cases. BJU Int. 2013;112(7):965–71. doi: 10.1111/ bju.12248

  6. Chi Q, Wang Y, Lu J, Wang X, Hao Y, Lu Z, et al. Ultrasonography combined with fluoroscopy for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis based on seven years single center experiences. Urol J. 2014;11(1):1216–21.

  7. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol. 2004;18(8):715–22. doi: 10.1089/ end.2004.18.715

  8. Francesca F, Felipetto R, Mosca F, Boggi U, Rizzo G, Puccini R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of transplanted kidney. J Endourol. 2002;16(4):225–7. doi: 10.1089/089277902753752179

  9. Desai MR, Jasani A. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in ectopic kidneys. J Endourol. 2000;14(3):289–92. doi: 10.1089/ end.2000.14.289

  10. Atwell T, Charboneau J, Reading C, McGahan J. Ultrasound guided biopsy and drainage of the abdomen and pelvis. In: Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. St Louis: Elsevier; 2004. p. 625-632.

  11. Foo Cheong Ng, Wai Loon Yam, Tze Ying Benjamin Lim, Jin Kiat Teo, Kok Kit Ng, Sey Kiat Lim. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Advantages and limitations. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58(5):346–52. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.346

  12. Chu C, Masic S, Usawachintachit M, Hu W, Yang W, Stoller M, et al. Ultrasound- Guided Renal Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Description of Three Novel Ultrasound-Guided Needle Techniques. J Endourol. 2016;30(2):153–8. doi: 10.1089/ end.2015.0185

  13. Jagtap J, Mishra S, Bhattu A, Ganpule A, Sabnis R, Desai MR. Which is the preferred modality of renal access for a trainee urologist: ultrasonography or fluoroscopy? Results of a prospective randomized trial. J Endourol. 2014;28(12):1464–9. doi: 10.1089/ end.2014.0229

  14. Agarwal M, Agrawal MS, Jaiswal A, Kumar D, Yadav H, Lavania P. Safety and efficacy of ultrasonography as an adjunct to fluoroscopy for renal access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). BJU Int. 2011;108(8):1346–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10002.x

  15. Fahmy NM, Elkoushy MA, Andonian S. Effective radiation exposure in evaluation and follow-up of patients with urolithiasis. Urology. 2012;79(1):43–7. doi: 10.1016/j. urology.2011.07.1387

  16. Iordache A, Baston C, Guler-Margaritis S-S, Angelescu E, Cerempei V, Olivier T, et al. Ultrasound for kidney access in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a contemporary review. Med Ultrason. 2018;20(4):508–14. doi: 10.11152/ mu-1618

  17. Bayne DB, Usawachintachit M, Tzou D, Taguchi K, Shindel A, Chi TL. Increasing Body Mass Index Steepens the Learning Curve for Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2018;120:68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.033

  18. Mahesh P, Desai & Arvind P, Ganpule P. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Access Under Ultrasound. In: Smith´s Textbook of Endourology. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2019. p. 237–42.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2021;81