>Year 2000, Issue 4
Ruy-Díaz RJAS, Obregón CL, Athié AAJ, Mijares GJM
Comparative study of the Ireton-Jones equation and indirect calorimetry to estimate resting energy rate in surgical patients
Cir Gen 2000; 22 (4)
PDF: 4. Kb.
Objective: To compare the Ireton-Jones equation and indirect calorimetry to estimate resting metabolic rate (RMR) in surgical patients.
Setting: Third level health care hospital.
Design: Prospective, comparative study. ANOVA and linear correlation coefficient were used, p ‹ 0.05.
Patients and methods: We estimated the resting metabolic rate (RMR) through the Ireto-Jones equation using parameters for patients without ventilatory support and through indirect calorimetry in patients hospitalised in the General Surgery Service from November 1996 to March 1998. Age, weight, size, body mass index (BMI) and diagnosis were considered. Indirect calorimetry was the golden standard. Patients were divided in 5 groups: Group I, severe acute pancreatitis; Group II, enterocutaneous fistulas; Group III, cancer patients; Group IV, sepsis; Group V, major surgery patients.
Results: We made 166 RMR determinations using the Ireton-Jones equation and calorimetry. Age of patients averaged 39.87 ± 14.41 years. Group I represented 40% of the determinations, group II, 31%; group III, 7%; group IV, 14%, and group V, 7%. RMR averaged 1505 ± 400 kcal/day as determined through calorimetry. Respiratory coefficient (RC) averaged 0.89 ± 0.14 and the non-proteic RC averaged 0.94 ± 0.16. The Ireton-Jones equation yielded a RMR of 1526 ± 247 kcal/day. Correlation coefficient for all groups was 0.6 (p = 0.0000). For Group I, it was 0.5 (p = 0.0000); for group II, 0.5 (p = 0.0019); for group III, 0.9 (p = 0.6659); for group IV, 0.7 (p = 0.3743); and group V, 0.7 (p = 0.3545). The percentage of variation was 2.46-22.3% for all groups
Conclusion: RMR determination by means of the Ireton-Jones equation is not statistically different from that obtained through indirect calorimetry in general populations, but is statistically different for specific groups of patients. Variations through the equation range from 2 to 22%. Indirect calorimetry remains the “Golden Standard” for RMR determination.
||Indirect calorimetry, energy metabolism, total parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition.
Kinney JM. Indirect calorimetry in malnutrition: nutritional assessment or therapeutic reference? JPEN. J Parent Enter Nutr 1987; 11(S Suppl): 90S-4S.
Foster GD, Knox LS, Dempsey DT, Mullen JL. Caloric requirements in total parenteral nutrition. J Am Coll Nutr 1987; 6: 231-53.
Donaldson-Andersen J, Fitzsimmons L. Metabolic requirements of the critically ill, mechanically ventilated trauma patient: measured versus predicted energy expenditure. Nutr Clin Prac 1998; 13: 25-31.
Ireton-Jones C. Indirect Calorimetry In: Skipper A, de. The dietitian’s handbook of enteral and parenteral nutrition, 2nd ed. Silver Spring, MD: Aspen Publishers, 1998.
Ireton-Jones C, Jones JD. Should predictive equations or indirect calorimetry be used to design nutrition support regimens? Predictive equations should be used. Nutr Clin Prac 1998; 13: 141-3.
Ireton-Jones CS, Turner WW Jr, Liepa GU, Baxter CR. Equations for the estimation of energy in expenditures in patients with burns with special reference to ventilatory status. J Burn Care Rehabil 1992; 13: 330-3.
Ireton-Jones C, Jones JD. Why use predictive equations for energy expenditure assessment. The American Diabetic Association 88th annual meeting. Boston Massachusetts, October 27-30, 1997. Abstracts. J Am Diet Assoc 1997; 97(9 Suppl): A1-137, A44.
Gangliardi E, Brathwaite LEM, Ross SE. Predicting energy expenditure in trauma patients. Validation of the Ireton-Jones equation. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) 19th Clinical Congress. Miami Beach, Florida, January 15-18, 1995. Abstracts JPEN. J Parent Enter Nutr 1995; 19(1Suppl): 1S-28S
Ruy-Díaz RJA, Obregón CL, Athié AAJ, Mijares GJM. Ecuaciones predictivas versus calorimetría indirecta en la estimación del gasto energético: La ecuación de Ireton-Jones. Rev Nutr Clin 1999; 2: 175-9
10 Wall JO, Wall PT, Ireton-Jones C. Accurate prediction of the energy expenditures of hospitalized patients. The American Dietetic Association 78th annual meeting. Chicago, IIIinois, October 30-November 2, 1995. Abstracts J Am Diet Assoc 1995; 95(9Suppl): A1-115: A24.
Makk LJ, McClave SA, Creech PW, Johnson DR, Short AF, Whitlow NL, et al. Clinical application of the metabolic cart to the delivery of total parenteral nutrition. Crit Care Med 1990; 18: 1320-7.
McClave SA, Lowen CC, Kleber MJ. Are patients fed appropriately according to their caloric requirements? JPEN J Parent Enter Nutr 1997; 21: S12.
Kudsk KA, Croce MA, Fabian TC, Minard G, Tolley EA, Poret HA, et al. Enteral versus parenteral feeding. Effects on septic morbidity after blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1992; 215: 503-11; discussion 511-3.
Baxter JK, Babineau TJ, Apovian CM. Perioperative glucose control predicts increased nosocomial infection in diabetics. Society of Critical Care Medicine, nineteenth annual educational and scientific symposium. San Francisco, California, May 29-June 1, 1990. Abstracts. Crit Care Med 1990; 18(4Suppl): S165-292: 207.
Garrel DR, Jobin N, de Jonge LM. Should we still use the Harris-Benedict equations? Nutr Clin Prac 1996; 11: 99-103.
Feurer ID, Crosby LO, Mullen JL. Measured and predicted resting energy expenditure in clinically stable patients. Clin Nutr 1984; 3: 27-34.
Weissman C, Kemper M, Askanazi J, Hyman AI, Kinney JM. Resting metabolic rate of the critically ill patient: measured versus predicted. Anaesthesiology 1986; 64: 673-9.
Jones J. Statistical analysis: correlation and regression. In: Ireton-Jones, Gottschlich MM, Bell S, eds. A practical handbook of nutrition research. Silver Spring, MD, Aspen Publishers, 1997; 19-38.
>Year 2000, Issue 4