González-Morales R, Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Alpuche-Aranda C, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 26
Paginas: 773-781
Archivo PDF: 253.69 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo. Investigar el cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de aislamiento ante síntomas de Covid-19 o contacto con un caso. Material y métodos. Estudio transversal basado en la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición 2020 sobre Covid-19. Se describió la prevalencia de aislamiento y su asociación con factores del nivel individual, hogar y contexto utilizando modelos de regresión log-binomial. Resultados. El 48.1% de la población ›10 años reportó quedarse en casa ante síntomas o contacto con un caso. La prevalencia de aislamiento fue menor entre población ocupada vs. no-ocupada (RP 0.81; IC95% 0.73-0.89), mayor entre personas con alto nivel socioeconómico vs. bajo (RP 1.22; IC95% 1.08-1.38) y menor entre personas viviendo en estados sin un mensaje específico sobre aislamiento vs. estados con mensaje específico (RP 0.76; IC95% 0.63-0.91). Conclusiones. El cumplimiento de las recomendaciones de aislamiento durante la pandemia de Covid-19 estuvo asociado con factores socioeconómicos individuales y con la calidad de los mensajes de salud pública de los estados.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Miyaki K, Sakurazawa H, Mikurube H, Nishizaka M, Ando H, Song Y, Shimbo T. An effective quarantine measure reduced the total incidence of influenza A H1N1 in the workplace: another way to control the H1N1 flu pandemic. J Occup Health.2011;53(4):287-92. https://doi.org/10.1539/ joh.10-0024-fs

2. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Información básica sobre la COVID- 10. Ginebra: OMS, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https:// www.who.int/es/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/questionand- answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19

3. UK National Health Service. Self-isolation and treating coronavirus symptoms. Reino Unido: National Health Service, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/selfisolation- and-treatment/

4. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. When to Quarantine: Stay home if you might have been exposed to COVID-19. Estados Unidos: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/ if-you-are-sick/quarantine.html#:~:text=Watch%20for%20symptoms%20 until%2014,the%20spread%20of%20COVID%2D19

5. Poder legislativo de Campeche. Información relevante COVID-19. Campeche: Congreso del estado de Campeche, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.congresocam.gob.mx/informacion-relevantecovid19/

6. Gobierno de Chiapas. Coronavirus Chiapas: Preguntas frecuentes. Chiapas: Gobierno de Chiapas, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: http:// coronavirus.saludchiapas.gob.mx/preguntas-frecuentes

7. Atchison C, Bowman LR, Vrinten C, Redd R, Pristerà P, Eaton J, Ward H. Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults. BMJ Open.2021;11(1):e043577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577

8. Smith LE, Potts HWW, Amlôt R, Fear NT, Michie S, Rubin GJ. Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys. BMJ. 2021;372:n608. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.n608

9. Scientific Adfisory Group for Emergencies (SPI-B). SPI-B: Impact of financial and other targeted support on rates of self-isolation or quarantine, 16 September 2020. Reino Unido: Gobierno de Reino Unido, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ spi-b-impact-of-financial-and-other-targeted-support-on-rates-ofself- isolation-or-quarantine-16-september-2020

10. Chou WP, Wang PW, Chen SL, Chang YP, Wu CF, Lu WH, Yen CF. Voluntary reduction of social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: Related factors and association with perceived social support. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17218039

11. Nkire N, Mrklas K, Hrabok M, Gusnowski A, Vuong W, Surood S, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: demographic predictors of self-isolation or self-quarantine and impact of isolation and quarantine on perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:553468. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.553468

12. Romero-Martínez M, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Cuevas-Nasu L, Bautista- Arredondo S, Colchero MA, Gaona EB, et al. Metodología de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutritición 2020 sobre Covid-19. Salud Publica Mex. 2021;63(3):444-51. https://doi.org/10.21149/12580

13. González-Morales R, Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Alpuche- Aranda C, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T. Información suplementaria. Harvard Dataverse, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HYIPCV

14. Deaton A, Zaidi S. Guidelines for constucting comsumption aggregates for welfare analysis. LSMS Working Paper; No. 135. Washington DC: World Bank, 2002 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/14101

15. Villagómez-Ornelas P, Hernández-López P, Carrasco-Enríquez B, Barrios- Sánchez K, Pérez-Escamilla R, Melgar-Quiñónez H. Statistical validity of the Mexican Food Security Scale and the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale. Salud Publica Mex. 2014;56 (suppl 1):S5-S11 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/ article/view/5160

16. Consejo Nacional de Población. Indice de marginación urbana 2010. México: CONAPO, 2015 [citado marzo 2019]. Disponible en: http://www. conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Indice_de_marginacion_urbana_2010

17. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Research on behavioural rules and well-being: round 3. RIVM, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: http://rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/ research/behaviour/behavioural-measures-and-well-being/round-3

18. Crane MA, Shermock KM, Omer SB, Romley JA. Change in reported adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic, April-November 2020. JAMA. 2021;325(9):883-85. https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.2021.0286

19. Webster RK, Brooks SK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Rubin GJ. How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence. Public Health. 2020;182:163-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.007

20. Patel J, Fernandes G, Sridhar D. Maximising public adherence to COVID-19 self-isolation in Europe. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;4:100089 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100089

21. Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Bautista-Arredondo S, Colchero MA, Stern D, Zepeda-Tello R, et al. Ciclos de trabajo-confinamiento para reducir la transmisión de Covid-19: evidencia y recomendaciones en el contexto de México. Salud Publica Mex. 2021;63(2):316-23. https://doi. org/10.21149/12105

22. Al-Sabbagh MQ, Al-Ani A, Mafrachi B, Siyam A, Isleem U, Massad FI, et al. Predictors of adherence with home quarantine during COVID-19 crisis: the case of health belief model. Psychol Health Med. 2021;26:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1871770

23. Koinig I. Risk Communication in the Age of COVID-19. IntechOpen. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96390

24. Benham JL, Lang R, Kovacs-Burns K, MacKean G, Léveillé T, McCormack B, et al. Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: A qualitative study to inform public health messaging. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246941. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246941

25. Escandon-Barbosa D, Hurtado A, Gomez A. Factors affecting voluntary self-isolation behavior to cope with a pandemic: Empirical evidence from Colombia vs. Spain in times of COVID-19. Behav Sci (Basel). 2021;11(3):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11030035

26. Bacon AM, Corr PJ. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom: A personality-based perspective on concerns and intention to self-isolate. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(4):839-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12423