González-Morales R, Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Alpuche-Aranda C, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 773-781
PDF size: 253.69 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective. To examine compliance to isolation and quarantine recommendations during the early phase of the Covid-19 epidemic in Mexico. Materials and methods. Cross-sectional population-based study (National Health and Nutrition Survey 2020 Covid-19). We estimated the prevalence of compliance with recommendations and assessed its association with individual, household and context level variables using log-binomial models. Results. 48.1% of the population over 10 years old reported staying at home when faced with symptoms or a potential contact with a case. The prevalence was lower in employed vs unemployed population (PR 0.81; 95%IC 0.73-0.89), higher among higher socioeconomic position groups vs lower (RP 1.22; 95%IC 1.08-1.38), and lower among people living in states with an unspecific public health message regarding isolation and quarantine (RP 0.76; 95%IC 0.63-0.91). Conclusions. Compliance to isolation and quarantine recommendations was associated with socioeconomic factors and the quality of public health messages during the Covid-19 pandemic in Mexico.

REFERENCES

1. Miyaki K, Sakurazawa H, Mikurube H, Nishizaka M, Ando H, Song Y, Shimbo T. An effective quarantine measure reduced the total incidence of influenza A H1N1 in the workplace: another way to control the H1N1 flu pandemic. J Occup Health.2011;53(4):287-92. https://doi.org/10.1539/ joh.10-0024-fs

2. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Información básica sobre la COVID- 10. Ginebra: OMS, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https:// www.who.int/es/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/questionand- answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19

3. UK National Health Service. Self-isolation and treating coronavirus symptoms. Reino Unido: National Health Service, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/coronavirus-covid-19/selfisolation- and-treatment/

4. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. When to Quarantine: Stay home if you might have been exposed to COVID-19. Estados Unidos: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/ if-you-are-sick/quarantine.html#:~:text=Watch%20for%20symptoms%20 until%2014,the%20spread%20of%20COVID%2D19

5. Poder legislativo de Campeche. Información relevante COVID-19. Campeche: Congreso del estado de Campeche, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.congresocam.gob.mx/informacion-relevantecovid19/

6. Gobierno de Chiapas. Coronavirus Chiapas: Preguntas frecuentes. Chiapas: Gobierno de Chiapas, 2021 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: http:// coronavirus.saludchiapas.gob.mx/preguntas-frecuentes

7. Atchison C, Bowman LR, Vrinten C, Redd R, Pristerà P, Eaton J, Ward H. Early perceptions and behavioural responses during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of UK adults. BMJ Open.2021;11(1):e043577. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043577

8. Smith LE, Potts HWW, Amlôt R, Fear NT, Michie S, Rubin GJ. Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys. BMJ. 2021;372:n608. https://doi. org/10.1136/bmj.n608

9. Scientific Adfisory Group for Emergencies (SPI-B). SPI-B: Impact of financial and other targeted support on rates of self-isolation or quarantine, 16 September 2020. Reino Unido: Gobierno de Reino Unido, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ spi-b-impact-of-financial-and-other-targeted-support-on-rates-ofself- isolation-or-quarantine-16-september-2020

10. Chou WP, Wang PW, Chen SL, Chang YP, Wu CF, Lu WH, Yen CF. Voluntary reduction of social interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: Related factors and association with perceived social support. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8039. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph17218039

11. Nkire N, Mrklas K, Hrabok M, Gusnowski A, Vuong W, Surood S, et al. COVID-19 pandemic: demographic predictors of self-isolation or self-quarantine and impact of isolation and quarantine on perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:553468. https://doi. org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.553468

12. Romero-Martínez M, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Cuevas-Nasu L, Bautista- Arredondo S, Colchero MA, Gaona EB, et al. Metodología de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutritición 2020 sobre Covid-19. Salud Publica Mex. 2021;63(3):444-51. https://doi.org/10.21149/12580

13. González-Morales R, Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Alpuche- Aranda C, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T. Información suplementaria. Harvard Dataverse, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/HYIPCV

14. Deaton A, Zaidi S. Guidelines for constucting comsumption aggregates for welfare analysis. LSMS Working Paper; No. 135. Washington DC: World Bank, 2002 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://openknowledge. worldbank.org/handle/10986/14101

15. Villagómez-Ornelas P, Hernández-López P, Carrasco-Enríquez B, Barrios- Sánchez K, Pérez-Escamilla R, Melgar-Quiñónez H. Statistical validity of the Mexican Food Security Scale and the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale. Salud Publica Mex. 2014;56 (suppl 1):S5-S11 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: https://www.saludpublica.mx/index.php/spm/ article/view/5160

16. Consejo Nacional de Población. Indice de marginación urbana 2010. México: CONAPO, 2015 [citado marzo 2019]. Disponible en: http://www. conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/Indice_de_marginacion_urbana_2010

17. The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Research on behavioural rules and well-being: round 3. RIVM, 2020 [citado abril 2021]. Disponible en: http://rivm.nl/en/novel-coronavirus-covid-19/ research/behaviour/behavioural-measures-and-well-being/round-3

18. Crane MA, Shermock KM, Omer SB, Romley JA. Change in reported adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic, April-November 2020. JAMA. 2021;325(9):883-85. https://doi. org/10.1001/jama.2021.0286

19. Webster RK, Brooks SK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Rubin GJ. How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence. Public Health. 2020;182:163-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.03.007

20. Patel J, Fernandes G, Sridhar D. Maximising public adherence to COVID-19 self-isolation in Europe. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021;4:100089 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100089

21. Pérez-Ferrer C, López-Olmedo N, Bautista-Arredondo S, Colchero MA, Stern D, Zepeda-Tello R, et al. Ciclos de trabajo-confinamiento para reducir la transmisión de Covid-19: evidencia y recomendaciones en el contexto de México. Salud Publica Mex. 2021;63(2):316-23. https://doi. org/10.21149/12105

22. Al-Sabbagh MQ, Al-Ani A, Mafrachi B, Siyam A, Isleem U, Massad FI, et al. Predictors of adherence with home quarantine during COVID-19 crisis: the case of health belief model. Psychol Health Med. 2021;26:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.1871770

23. Koinig I. Risk Communication in the Age of COVID-19. IntechOpen. 2021. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96390

24. Benham JL, Lang R, Kovacs-Burns K, MacKean G, Léveillé T, McCormack B, et al. Attitudes, current behaviours and barriers to public health measures that reduce COVID-19 transmission: A qualitative study to inform public health messaging. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246941. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246941

25. Escandon-Barbosa D, Hurtado A, Gomez A. Factors affecting voluntary self-isolation behavior to cope with a pandemic: Empirical evidence from Colombia vs. Spain in times of COVID-19. Behav Sci (Basel). 2021;11(3):35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11030035

26. Bacon AM, Corr PJ. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United Kingdom: A personality-based perspective on concerns and intention to self-isolate. Br J Health Psychol. 2020;25(4):839-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12423