Ortiz G, Domínguez J, Ospina N, Agudelo L

Idioma: Ingles.
Referencias bibliográficas: 24
Paginas: 59-64
Archivo PDF: 317.20 Kb.

RESUMEN

El tratamiento de rehabilitación protésica en pacientes con labio fisurado y paladar hendido (CLP, por sus siglas en inglés) representa un reto para los profesionales involucrados; es necesario individualizar cada caso para determinar la mejor opción terapéutica. El objetivo de este informe de caso es describir paso a paso la toma de decisiones clínicas para un paciente con CLP tratado en el IPS CES Sabaneta por los cursos de postgrado de cirugía maxilofacial y rehabilitación oral, discutir la evidencia científica y los resultados obtenidos.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Chrcanovic BR, Abreu MH. Survival and complications of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 17 (2): 81-93. doi: 10.1007/s10006-012-0331-z.

2. Cooper LF. The current and future treatment of edentulism. J Prosthodont. 2009; 18 (2): 116-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00441.x.

3. Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Abrahamsson P, Sennerby L. Evaluation of 31 zygomatic implants and 74 regular dental implants used in 16 patients for prosthetic reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with cross-arch fixed bridges. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7 (3): 159-165.

4. Graves S, Mahler BA, Javid B, Armellini D, Jensen OT. Maxillary all-on-four therapy using angled implants: a 16-month clinical study of 1110 implants in 276 jaws. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011; 23 (2): 277-287, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2011.02.002.

5. Bidra AS, Huynh-Ba G. Implants in the pterygoid region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40 (8): 773-781. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.04.007.

6. Weingart D, Bublitz R, Petrin G, Kälber J, Ingimarsson S. Kombination der Sinusliftoperation mit der lateralen Kieferkammaugmentation. Ein Behandlungskonzept zur chirurgisch-prothetischen Rehabilitation der extremen Oberkieferalveolarkammatrophie [Combined sinus lift procedure and lateral augmentation. A treatment concept for the surgical and prosthodontic rehabilitation of the extremely atrophic maxilla]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005; 9 (5): 317-323. German. doi: 10.1007/s10006-005-0627-3.

7. Scarano A, Degidi M, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. Sinus augmentation with phycogene hydroxyapatite: histological and histomorphometrical results after 6 months in humans. A case series. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 16 (1): 41-45. doi: 10.1007/s10006-011-0296-3.

8. Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2007; 9 (1): 15-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00027.x.

9. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993; 8 (4): 400-408.

10. Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Henry PJ, Andreasson L, Branemark PI, Chiapasco M, et al. A clinical evaluation of the Zygoma fixture: one year of follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 62 (9 Suppl 2): 22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.06.030.

11. Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Garcia R, Arevalo X, Muela R, Fortes V. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006; 8 (3): 114-122. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.

12. Kahnberg KE, Henry PJ, Hirsch JM, Ohrnell LO, Andreasson L, Branemark PI, et al. Clinical evaluation of the zygoma implant: 3-year follow-up at 16 clinics. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65 (10): 2033-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.013.

13. Bedrossian E. Rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla with the zygoma concept: a 7-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25 (6): 1213-1221.

14. Davo R, Pons O, Rojas J, Carpio E. Immediate function of four zygomatic implants: a 1-year report of a prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010; 3 (4): 323-334.

15. Sartori EM, Padovan LE, de Mattias Sartori IA, Ribeiro PD Jr, Gomes de Souza Carvalho AC, Goiato MC. Evaluation of satisfaction of patients rehabilitated with zygomatic fixtures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012; 70 (2): 314-319. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.044.

16. Chiapasco M, Romeo E. Rehabilitación implantosoportada en casos complejos. Cap 7. Actualidades Médico Odontológicas Latinoamérica C.A.. Amolca, 2006, pp. 319-327.

17. Dinato JC. Implantes oseointegrados. Cirugía y prótesis. Editora Artes Médicas Ltda. 2003, pp. 349-362.

18. Goiato MC, Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, Santiago JF Jr, Haddad MF, Pesqueira AA, et al. Prosthetic treatments for patients with oronasal communication. J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22 (4): 1445-1447. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821d17bd.

19. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallén O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977; 16: 1-132.

20. Branemark PI, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum Branemark in full edentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995; 6 (4): 227-231. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060405.x.

21. Kato Y, Kizu Y, Tonogi M, Ide Y, Yamane GY. Internal structure of zygomatic bone related to zygomatic fixture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005; 63 (9): 1325-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2005.05.313.

22. Worley ML, Patel KG, Kilpatrick LA. Cleft lip and palate. Clin Perinatol. 2018; 45 (4): 661-678. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2018.07.006.

23. Shkoukani MA, Lawrence LA, Liebertz DJ, Svider PF. Cleft palate: a clinical review. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2014; 102 (4): 333-342. doi: 10.1002/bdrc.21083.

24. Abraham KM. Contemporary oral oncology. 2017.