Ortíz CM, Zamora LJA, Ruiz MNA

Idioma: Español
Referencias bibliográficas: 27
Paginas: 297-301
Archivo PDF: 66.91 Kb.

RESUMEN

Objetivo: comparar el número de seromas postoperatorios en heridas de mastectomía con el uso de uno o dos drenajes.
Pacientes y métodos: se estudiaron mujeres con neoplasias mamarias malignas, a las que se les efectúo mastectomía radical modificada Madden. Se dividieron en dos grupos: en el grupo A se colocaron dos drenajes (axilar y pectoral) y en el grupo B, un drenaje (axilar). Se determinaron las variables demográficas, el índice de masa corporal (IMC = kg/m²), el número de seromas en ambos grupos y el tiempo que el paciente duró con el drenaje.
Resultados: se evaluaron 27 pacientes: grupo A con 12 pacientes y grupo B con 15. Edad (en años): A 56 ± 14 vs B 50 ± 6.5 (p NS); IMC: A 33.2 ± 3.4 vs B 32.6 ± 4.5 (p NS); seromas: A 4 vs B 5 (p NS); tiempo que el paciente duró con el drenaje: A 23 ± 6, B 24 ± 7 (p NS) semanas.
Conclusiones: no existen diferencias en el número de seromas postoperatorios en heridas de mastectomía con el uso de uno o dos drenajes.

REFERENCIAS (EN ESTE ARTÍCULO)

1. Rodríguez-Cuevas S, Macías CG, Franceschi D, et al. Breast carcinoma presents a decade earlier in Mexican women than in women in the United States or European countries. Cancer 2001;91:863-8.

2. Primera revisión del Consenso Nacional sobre Tratamiento del Cáncer Mamario. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2002;70:349-60.

3. Calderón-Garcidueñas AL, Parás-Barrientos FU, Cárdenas-Ibarra L, et al. Risk factors of breast cancer in Mexican women. Salud Publica Mex 2000;42:26-33.

4. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Eng J Med 1995;332:907-11.

5. Gupta R, Pate K, Varshney S, et al. A comparison of 5-day and 8-day drainage following mastectomy and axillary clearance. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:26-30.

6. Pogson CJ, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:711-7.

7. Terrel GS, Singer JA. Axillary versus combined axillary and pectoral drainage after modified radical mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;175:437-40.

8. Puttawibul P, Sangthong B, Maipang T, et al. Mastectomy without drain at pectoral area: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2003;86:325-31.

9. O’Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177:450-3.

10. Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, et al. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg 2000;66:444-50.

11. Somers RG, Jablon LK, Kaplan MJ, et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1992;215:146-9.

12. Liu CD, McFadden DW. Overnight closed suction drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;63:868-70.

13. Jeffrey SS, Goodson WH, Ikeda DM, et al. Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer without axillary drainage. Arch Surg 1995;130:909-12

14. Porter KA, O’Connor S, Rimm E, et al. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg 1998;176:8-11.

15. Moore M, Burak WE, Nelson E, et al. Fibrin sealant reduces the duration and amount of fluid drainage after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:591-9.

16. Classe JM, Dupre PF, Francois T, et al. Axillary padding as an alternative to closed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg 2002;137:169-72.

17. Uden P, Aspegren K, Balldin G, et al. Fibrin adhesive in radical mastectomy. Eur J Surg 1993;159:263-5.

18. Chaturvedi P, Chaturvedi U. Axillary compression with delayed drain removal reduces prolonged seroma formation. J Surg Oncol 2001;78:279-80.

19. O’Dwyer PJ, O’Higgins NJ, James AG. Effect of closing dead space on incidence of seroma after mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:55-56.

20. Van Heurn LWE, Brink PRG. Prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:931-2.

21. Kopelman D, Klemm O, Bahous H, et al. Postoperative suction drainage of the axilla: for how long? Prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg 1999;165:117-20.

22. Purushotham AD, McLatchie E, Young D, et al. Randomized clinical trial for no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:286-92.

23. Watt-Boolsen S, Jacobsen K, Blichert-Toft M. Total mastectomy with special reference to surgical technique, extent of axillary dissection and complications. Acta Oncol 1988;27:663-5.

24. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Jolly PC. Wound complication after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg 1991;161:584-8.

25. Chilson TR, Chan FD, Lonser RR, et al. Seroma prevention after modified radical mastectomy. Am Surg 1992;12:750-4.

26. Siegel BM, Mayzel KA, Love SM. Level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. An analysis of 259 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1990;125:1144-17.

27. Bonnema J, van Geel AN, Ligtenstein DA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 1997;173:76-79.