medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 06

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2005; 73 (06)

Frequency of postoperative seromas in mastectomy wounds with the use of one or two drainages: a pilot study

Ortíz CM, Zamora LJA, Ruiz MNA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 297-301
PDF size: 66.91 Kb.


Key words:

breast, cancer, mastectomy, surgery.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the number of postoperative seromas after mastectomy with the use of one or two drainages.
Patients and methods: Women with malignant tumors who underwent Madden modified radical mastectomy were studied.
They were divided into two groups: group A two drainages (axillar and pectoral), group B only one (axillar). For both groups demographical issues, body mass index (BMI = kg/m2), seromas and drainage period were determined.
Results: Twenty seven patients were evaluated: group A composed of 12 patients and B composed of 15. Age (years): A 56 ± 14 vs B 50 ± 6.5 (p NS), BMI: A 33.2 ± 3.4 vs B 32.6 ± 4.5 (p NS); seromas: A 4 vs B 5 (p NS); drainage period: A 23 ± 6 vs B 24 ± 7 (p NS).
Conclusions: There are no differences in postoperative seroma development in mastectomy wounds with the use of one or two drainages.


REFERENCES

  1. Rodríguez-Cuevas S, Macías CG, Franceschi D, et al. Breast carcinoma presents a decade earlier in Mexican women than in women in the United States or European countries. Cancer 2001;91:863-8.

  2. Primera revisión del Consenso Nacional sobre Tratamiento del Cáncer Mamario. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2002;70:349-60.

  3. Calderón-Garcidueñas AL, Parás-Barrientos FU, Cárdenas-Ibarra L, et al. Risk factors of breast cancer in Mexican women. Salud Publica Mex 2000;42:26-33.

  4. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, et al. Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer. N Eng J Med 1995;332:907-11.

  5. Gupta R, Pate K, Varshney S, et al. A comparison of 5-day and 8-day drainage following mastectomy and axillary clearance. Eur J Surg Oncol 2001;27:26-30.

  6. Pogson CJ, Ebbs SR. Seroma following breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003;29:711-7.

  7. Terrel GS, Singer JA. Axillary versus combined axillary and pectoral drainage after modified radical mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;175:437-40.

  8. Puttawibul P, Sangthong B, Maipang T, et al. Mastectomy without drain at pectoral area: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 2003;86:325-31.

  9. O’Hea BJ, Ho MN, Petrek JA. External compression dressing versus standard dressing after axillary lymphadenectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177:450-3.

  10. Woodworth PA, McBoyle MF, Helmer SD, et al. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: incidence and predicting factors. Am Surg 2000;66:444-50.

  11. Somers RG, Jablon LK, Kaplan MJ, et al. The use of closed suction drainage after lumpectomy and axillary node dissection for breast cancer. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1992;215:146-9.

  12. Liu CD, McFadden DW. Overnight closed suction drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Am Surg 1997;63:868-70.

  13. Jeffrey SS, Goodson WH, Ikeda DM, et al. Axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer without axillary drainage. Arch Surg 1995;130:909-12

  14. Porter KA, O’Connor S, Rimm E, et al. Electrocautery as a factor in seroma formation following mastectomy. Am J Surg 1998;176:8-11.

  15. Moore M, Burak WE, Nelson E, et al. Fibrin sealant reduces the duration and amount of fluid drainage after axillary dissection: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Am Coll Surg 2001;192:591-9.

  16. Classe JM, Dupre PF, Francois T, et al. Axillary padding as an alternative to closed suction drain for ambulatory axillary lymphadenectomy: a prospective cohort of 207 patients with early breast cancer. Arch Surg 2002;137:169-72.

  17. Uden P, Aspegren K, Balldin G, et al. Fibrin adhesive in radical mastectomy. Eur J Surg 1993;159:263-5.

  18. Chaturvedi P, Chaturvedi U. Axillary compression with delayed drain removal reduces prolonged seroma formation. J Surg Oncol 2001;78:279-80.

  19. O’Dwyer PJ, O’Higgins NJ, James AG. Effect of closing dead space on incidence of seroma after mastectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1991;172:55-56.

  20. Van Heurn LWE, Brink PRG. Prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary lymphadenectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:931-2.

  21. Kopelman D, Klemm O, Bahous H, et al. Postoperative suction drainage of the axilla: for how long? Prospective randomized trial. Eur J Surg 1999;165:117-20.

  22. Purushotham AD, McLatchie E, Young D, et al. Randomized clinical trial for no wound drains and early discharge in the treatment of women with breast cancer. Br J Surg 2002;89:286-92.

  23. Watt-Boolsen S, Jacobsen K, Blichert-Toft M. Total mastectomy with special reference to surgical technique, extent of axillary dissection and complications. Acta Oncol 1988;27:663-5.

  24. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Jolly PC. Wound complication after modified radical mastectomy compared with tylectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Am J Surg 1991;161:584-8.

  25. Chilson TR, Chan FD, Lonser RR, et al. Seroma prevention after modified radical mastectomy. Am Surg 1992;12:750-4.

  26. Siegel BM, Mayzel KA, Love SM. Level I and II axillary dissection in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. An analysis of 259 consecutive patients. Arch Surg 1990;125:1144-17.

  27. Bonnema J, van Geel AN, Ligtenstein DA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of high versus low vacuum drainage after axillary dissection for breast cancer. Am J Surg 1997;173:76-79.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2005;73