medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2021; 81 (5)

Incomplete urethral duplication. Case report and literature review

Mendoza-Sánchez LJ, Calviac-Mendoza R, Guerra-Rodríguez M, Nápoles-Rivera JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page:
PDF size: 320.37 Kb.


Key words:

Urethral duplication, congenital aberration, diagnosis and treatment.

ABSTRACT

Description of the case: 3-year-old male who consulted for episodes of dysuria and urine leakage from the perineal region after physiological urination, on physical examination a reddened papule was found in the perineal region, which is why a voiding urethrocystography was performed diagnosing Effman’s type IIa-2 urethral duplication and it was decided to perform complete removal of the accessory tract.
Relevance:Urethral duplication is an unusual congenital entity, with very few cases reported in the literature, even described only due to anatomical concerns and is usually associated with other gastrointestinal and genitourinary malformations.
Clinical implications: urethral duplication is a rare entity, diagnosed in childhood, which can be associated with other malformations. Voiding urethrocystography allows the diagnosis to be made. Removal of the accessory tract was the indicated treatment with a favorable outcome.
Conclusions: urethral duplication is a rare entity, diagnosed in childhood, associated with other malformations. Voiding urethrocystography allows the diagnosis to be made. Removal of the accessory tract was the indicated treatment with a favorable outcome.


REFERENCES

  1. Foladi N, Karimy MJ. Type IIB urethral duplication in young adult-A case report. Radiol Case Rep. 2020;15(8):1138–41. doi: 10.1016/j. radcr.2020.05.005

  2. Adams MC, Joseph DB. Reconstruccion de las vías urinarias en niños. In: Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Panamericana; 2015. p. 3428,3573.

  3. Espinosa-Chávez Giordano B, Torres-Medina Eduardo, Muñoz-Islas Edgar I, Vilchis- Cardenas Marco, Acosta-Garduño Jorge. Reconstrucción total de uretra en masculino con duplicación uretral. Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71(1):22–5.

  4. Suoub M, Saleem MM, Sawaqed F.

  5. Patrick C, Cartwright BW, Snow C, Wallis C. Bladder and Urethra. In: Ashcraft’s Pediatric Surgery. 7th ed. Kansas: Elsevier; 2019.

  6. Bogaert G. Urethral duplication and other urethral anomalies. In: Pediatric urology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010. p. 446–52.

  7. Baid M, Dutta A. Urethral Duplication in a 15-Year-Old: Case Report With Review of the Literature. Rev Urol. 2014;16(3):149–51.

  8. Saran RK, Mirdha K, Saran S, Takhar RP. Urethral duplication with rectourethral fistula: Review of two cases. Urology Annals. 2020;12(1):92. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_25_19

  9. Stephens FD, Donnellan WL. ‘H-type’ urethroanal fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 1977;12(1):95–102. doi: 10.1016/0022- 3468(77)90302-5




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2021;81