medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Boletín Clínico Hospital Infantil del Estado de Sonora

Boletín Clínico de la Asociación Médica del Hospital Infantil del Estado de Sonora
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2021, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Bol Clin Hosp Infant Edo Son 2021; 38 (1)

Breastfeeding and its impact on the environment

Reyes-Vázquez HL, Espejel-Huerta D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 22-27
PDF size: 102.46 Kb.


Key words:

human lactation, pollution, carbon footprint, methane.

ABSTRACT

Breast milk is a natural, safe and renewable resource, so it is harmless to the environment. Producing unnecessary infant and toddler formulas exacerbates environmental damage. The dairy industry contributes around 30% of the world’s greenhouse gases. Methane production from livestock is second only to oil and gas industry production, and methane traps heat in the earth, being 30 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. Infant formulas add up to household waste tons of paper and metal in the world. The kilometers accumulated in the transport of raw materials and ingredients to these plants and transport of finished formula to consumers around the world are considerable, generating environmental pollution. Since powdered cow’s milk is not nutritionally suitable for a developing baby, the formula is supplemented with additives (palm oil, coconut), minerals and vitamins. It is not clear if these supplements are nutritionally optimal, but their production has an undeniable effect on the environment. In relation to the carbon footprint, breastfeeding saves between 95 and 153 kg of CO2 per baby, in six months, compared to formula feeding. To remove the myriad obstacles that new breastfeeding mothers face, we must recognize that “our house is on fire” and that the next generation requires us to act quickly.


REFERENCES

  1. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediátricas. 2012; 129(3): e827 -e841.

  2. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, et al. Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016; 387: 475-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(15)01024-7 26869575

  3. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, et al. Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016; 387: 491-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(15)01044-2 26869576

  4. Dadhich J, Smith J, Iellamo A, Suleiman A. Carbon footprints due to milk formula. A study from selected countries of the Asia Pacific region. IBFAN. 2015.

  5. Karlsson JO, Garnett T, Rollins NC, Röös E. The carbon footprint of breastmilk substitutes in comparison with breastfeeding. J Clean Prod. 2019; 222: 436-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.043 31190697

  6. WHA. World Health Assembly resolution on the inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children. WHO. 2016.

  7. Legesse G, Ominski KH, Beauchemin KA, et al. Board-invited review: quantifying wáter use in ruminant production. J Anim Sci. 2017; 95: 2001-18. doi: 10.2527/jas2017.1439 28726986

  8. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM. The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012; 109: 3232-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109936109 22331890

  9. Mandler B, Allison E. Methane emissions in the oil and gas industry. American Geosciences Institute; 2018.

  10. Coutsoudis A, Coovadia HM, King J. The breastmilk brand: promotion of child survival in the face of formula-milk marketing. Lancet. 2009; 374: 423-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60661-9 19647609

  11. Penn State Extension Carbon, Methane emissions and the dayri cow. Up date May 5; 2016.

  12. Seyed EhsanA Hosseini, Mazlan Abdul Wahid. Pollutant in Palm Oil Production Process. Jour Air & Waste Manag Associ. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.873092

  13. Coconut oil and its use in infant formula manufacturing. Jour Amer Coll of Nutri. 2013; 7(4), 325-329. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1988.10720250

  14. Save the Children. Milk formula companies: violating rules and threatening lives. Press reléase; 2018.

  15. FDA. Powdered infant formula: an overview of manufacturing processes; 2017 Disponible en: https:// wayback.archive it.org/7993/20170405150238/ https://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/03/ briefing/ 3939b1_tab4b.htm

  16. Potier M, ed. The world market for infant formula. EWPA GA annual congress; 2016. Disponible en: http: //www.euromilk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ EWPA/General_Assembly/2016/Open_Session_ Nice_2016/5._Mylene_Potier_-_Infant_Formula_ and_Whey__2_.pdf

  17. EPA. Greenhouse gas emissions equivalencies calculator. Disponible en: https://www.epa.gov/energy/ greenhouse-gas-equivalencies-calculator

  18. European Food Safety Authority. “Growing-up” formula: No additional value to a balanced diet, says EFSA. Press release; 25 Oct 2013. Disponible en: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/ 131025

  19. Pomeranz JL, Romo Palafox MJ, Harris JL. Toddler drinks, formulas, and milks: Labeling practices and policy implications. Prev Med. 2018; 109: 11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.01.009 29339115

  20. Thunberg G. “You did not act in time.” Guardian. 2019 Apr 23. Disponible en: https://www.theguardian. com/environment/2019/apr/23/greta-thunbergfull- speech-to-mps-you-did-not-act-in-time

  21. Joffe N, Webster F, Shenker N. Support for breastfeeding is an environmental imperative. BMJ. 2019; 367: l5646. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5646 [Published 2 October 2019].




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Bol Clin Hosp Infant Edo Son. 2021;38