Mendoza-Vilcahuaman J, Villca-Vargas RJ, Romero-Parejas PE, Muñoz-De La Torre RJ, Cárdenas-Pineda L, Guerra-Olivares T

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 342-347
PDF size: 231.68 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To determine the main characteristics of patients with previous cesarean section.
Materials and Methods: Quantitative, descriptive, observational and retrospective study carried out at the Regional Hospital of Tropical Medicine Julio César Demarini Caro, Chanchamayo, Junín, Peru, between January 2020 and June 2021. The information was collected from the complete and legible medical records of the research subjects and was collected in an Excel database and processed in SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics, measures of central tendency and simple frequencies were applied.
Results: The sample studied consisted of 200 women whose last gestation was terminated by cesarean section; the indication was, precisely, previous cesarean section. Forty percent had no other secondary indication for cesarean section and 19% had acute fetal distress as an additional indication. Obstetric characteristics: multiparous (83.5%), with adequate inter-gestational period (62.5%), with adequate prenatal care (69%), and with gynecoid pelvis (84.5%). Maternal complications: moderate and severe anemia (64.5%), uterine rupture (10.5%) and uterine atony (5%). Perinatal complications: Apgar less than 7 (15%), neonatal asphyxia (11%) and respiratory failure syndrome (9%).
Conclusions: Indications for previous cesarean sections were acute fetal distress, cephalopelvic disproportion, funicular disorders, hypertensive disorders, severe oligohydramnios and presentation dystocias. The main maternal and perinatal complications were moderate and severe anemia, uterine rupture, uterine atony, newborn Apgar less than 7, neonatal asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome and premature newborn.

REFERENCES

1. Organizacion Mundial de La Salud. Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/ publications/maternal_perinatal_health/ cs-statement/es/

2. Organización Panamericana de la Salud/, Organización Mundial de la Salud. La cesárea solo debería realizarse cuando es medicamente necesaria. 2015. https://www3.paho. org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article& id=10646:2015-la-cesarea-solo-deberia-realizarse-cuandoes- medicamente-necesaria&Itemid=1926&lang=es

3. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016; 11 (2). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

4. Kirchengast S, Hartmann B. Recent Lifestyle Parameters Are Associated with Increasing Caesarean Section Rates among Singleton Term Births in Austria. Int J Environ Res Public Heal 2019; 16 (1):14. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010014

5. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática. Series Anuales de indicadores principales de la ENDES, 1986- 2020. https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/ publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1795/

6. Hernández Sampieri R, Fernández Collado C, del Pilar Baptista Lucio M. Metodología de la investigación, 6ª ed. México: Interamericana, 2014.

7. Ticona-Huanco D, Ticona-Rendón M, Huanco-Apaza D, García-Montenegro V, Vargas-Zeballos J. Análisis de la cesárea según la clasificación de Robson en un hospitral público de Perú. Ginecol y Obstet Méx 2019; 87 (10): 626- 36. https://doi.org/10.24245/gom.v87i10.3301

8. Barrena Neyra M, Quispesaravia Ildefonso P, Flores Noriega M, Leon Rabanal C. Frecuencia e indicaciones del parto por cesárea en un hospital docente de Lima, Perú. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet 2020; 66 (2): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.31403/ rpgo.v66i2246

9. Sargent J, Caughey AB. Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Trends: Which Way Is the Pendulum Swinging? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2017; 44 (4): 655-66. doi: 10.1016/j. ogc.2017.08.006

10. De Leo R, La Gamba DA, Manzoni P, De Lorenzi R, Torresan S, Franchi M, et al. Vaginal birth after two previous cesarean sections versus elective repeated cesarean: A Retrospective Study. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (1): S84-88. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714344

11. Hernández S, Basteiro E, Meler E, Cobo T, Figueras F, Parra J, et al. Medicina Materno Fetal, Barcelona. Protocolo de Cesárea. Hosp Clínic, Hosp St Joan Déu, Univ Barcelona 2020; 1-26. https://medicinafetalbarcelona.org/protocolos/ es/obstetricia/cesarea.pdf

12. Kongwattanakul K, Thamprayoch R, Kietpeerakool C, Lumbiganon P. Risk of severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in deliveries with repeated and primary cesarean deliveries versus vaginal deliveries: A Cross- Sectional Study. J Pregnancy 2020; ID 9207431 https:// doi.org/10.1155/2020/9207431

13. Hernández-Espinosa CJ, Hernández-Espinosa CJ. La epidemia de cesáreas como limitante del parto humanizado. Medicas UIS [Internet]. 2019; 32 (1): 9-12. http://www. scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121- 03192019000100009&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=es

14. Levin G, Meyer R, Mor N, Yagel S, David M, Yinon Y, et al. Trial of Labor After Cesarean in Adolescents – A Multicenter Study. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2020 Aug 1;33(4):398– 402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2020.02.006

15. Martínez RAO, Urrea EM, Solarte JM, Daza JM. Prevalencia de complicaciones en pacientes sometidas a cesárea en el periodo comprendido entre enero a diciembre del 2016 en el Hospital Universitario San José de Popayán, Colombia 2016. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Dec 16];84(6):435-48. http://www. scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717- 75262019000600435&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

16. Puma J, Díaz J, Caparó C. Complicaciones maternas de la cesárea en gestantes a término en periodo expulsivo en un hospital general de Lima, Perú. Rev Medica Hered 2015; 26 (1): 17-23. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo. php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1018-130X2015000100004 &lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es